1 / 21

A Discriminative Key Pose Sequence Model for Recognizing Human Interactions

A Discriminative Key Pose Sequence Model for Recognizing Human Interactions. Arash Vahdat, Bo Gao, Mani Ranjbar, and Greg Mori ICCV2011. Goal. Outline. Introduction Related methods Modeling Human Interactions Single Subject Key Pose Sequence Model Interaction Key Pose Sequence Model

nardo
Download Presentation

A Discriminative Key Pose Sequence Model for Recognizing Human Interactions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Discriminative Key Pose Sequence Model for Recognizing Human Interactions Arash Vahdat, Bo Gao, Mani Ranjbar, and Greg Mori ICCV2011

  2. Goal

  3. Outline • Introduction • Related methods • Modeling Human Interactions • Single Subject Key Pose Sequence Model • Interaction Key Pose Sequence Model • Learning the parameters • Experiments

  4. Introduction • This paper focuses on recognizing interactions between individuals. • The sequences of key poses between peoples will be combined into activity level. • The activities to be recognized include hugging ,shaking hands,pointing, punching, kicking,pushing each others.

  5. Introduction • Not every movement or pose by the target is relevant to the activity to be recognized. • We use an examplar-based model by giving the pose a score to match the key poses. • When people do some activities, they will do the key poses in a chronological order.

  6. Related methods • Ryoo and Aggarwal [13]develop a matching kernel that considers spatial and temporal relations between space-time interest points. • Yao et al. [23] use a Hough transform voting scheme from an interest point representation. [13] M. Ryoo and J. Aggarwal. Spatio-temporal relationship match: Video structure comparison for recognition of complex human activities. In ICCV, 2009. [23] A. Yao, J. Gall, and L. Van Gool. A hough transform-based voting framework for action recognition. In CVPR, 2010. 2, 6

  7. Recognition result in [13]

  8. Modeling Human Interactions • There are four things to know: • 1. Who is involved in the interaction? • Subject or object • 2. When do the key poses occur? • The interval of the key poses • 3. How are the key poses executed? • With hand or leg , powerful or weak • 4. Where are the people when the key poses occur?

  9. Modeling Human Interactions • we will assume F maximizes a model G that includes the latent variables H: • The variables H are the answer of the four questions above.

  10. Single Subject Key Pose Sequence Model

  11. Single Subject Key Pose Sequence Model • We represent each key pose by h: • Denote K key poses of a sequense by H

  12. Single Subject Key Pose Sequence Model • Exemplar Matching Link: • Compute the pose connection strength to the exemplar poses.

  13. Single Subject Key Pose Sequence Model • Activity-Key Pose Link: • Compute the sequence similarity in the activity to give a score. • Direct Root Model:

  14. Interaction Key Pose Sequence Model • Update the model from individual to two people interaction. • We should recognize who is subject or object. • The scoring function will be:

  15. Learning the parameters • Define the scoring function E(x,y): • Use multiclass linear SVM classifier to find the best parameters.

  16. Experiments • The UT-Interaction dataset contains videos of 6 classes of human-human interactions. • Set 1 is with a stationary background,and Set 2 is with slight background movement and camera jitter.

  17. Experiments

  18. Experiments

  19. Experiments

  20. Experiments

  21. Conclusion • This paper focuses on the key poses method to recognize the interaction. • The precision is over 90% and outperform other methods in UT-interaction dataset.

More Related