1 / 39

Your papers on APPL, BA & F

Your papers on APPL, BA & F. Watch outs. A company is an “it” not a “they” “Boeing generates its international sales in Burundi and East Timor.”. Watch outs. A company is an “it” not a “they” “Boeing generates its international sales in Burundi and East Timor.”

napua
Download Presentation

Your papers on APPL, BA & F

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Your papers on APPL, BA & F

  2. Watch outs.... • A company is an “it” not a “they” • “Boeing generates its international sales in Burundi and East Timor.”

  3. Watch outs.... • A company is an “it” not a “they” • “Boeing generates its international sales in Burundi and East Timor.” • “$200 billion” not “two hundred billion dollars” or “200 billion dollars”

  4. Watch outs.... • A company is an “it” not a “they” • “Boeing generates its international sales in Burundi and East Timor.” • “$200 billion” not “two hundred billion dollars” or “200 billion dollars” • Two adjectives before a noun gets a hyphen (usually)

  5. Watch outs.... • A company is an “it” not a “they” • “Boeing generates its international sales in Burundi and East Timor.” • “$200 billion” not “two hundred billion dollars” or “200 billion dollars” • Two adjectives before a noun gets a hyphen (usually) • “Apple’s research-savvy team generates new products.”

  6. One more watch out • It’s = it is • “Its” is possessive • “Apple generates its sales via the internet.” • “It’s possible for Apple to continue growing.”

  7. So why does public not support international trade?

  8. So why does public not support international trade? • Our old friends trade fallacies

  9. So why does public not support international trade? • Our old friends trade fallacies • Protectionism in Europe estimated to cost $215,000 per year per job

  10. So why does public not support international trade? • Our old friends trade fallacies • Protectionism in Europe estimated to cost $215,000 per year per job • “the costs are not simply their salaries, but the even larger costs of producing in less efficient ways, using up scarce resources that would be more productive elsewhere”

  11. Why is “globalization” a naughty word?

  12. Why is “globalization” a naughty word? • Anti-globalization critics see international trade as destroying nations, the environment, small farms, etc. • International trade is just extension of specialization that marks every modern economy

  13. Why is “globalization” a naughty word? • Anti-globalization critics see international trade as destroying nations, the environment, small farms, etc. • International trade is just extension of specialization that marks every modern economy • Why don’t we make our own socks and jeans?

  14. Why is “globalization” a naughty word? • Anti-globalization critics see international trade as destroying nations, the environment, small farms, etc. • International trade is just extension of specialization that marks every modern economy • Why don’t we make our own socks and jeans? • We’re better off buying them from Vietnam and concentrating on software and lattes

  15. Good summary of international trade: • International trade is not a zero-sum contest, but wide array of voluntary transactions between individuals living in different countries who all must gain... another way getting more out of SRTHAU

  16. Trade to GDP ratio • Total of imports & exports as a percent of GDP

  17. Trade to GDP ratio • Total of imports & exports as a percent of GDP • China: 58%

  18. Trade to GDP ratio • Total of imports & exports as a percent of GDP • China: 58% • U.S.:27.6%

  19. Trade to GDP ratio • Total of imports & exports as a percent of GDP • China: 58% • U.S.:27.6% • U.S. is world’s leading importer, #3 exporter and #1 in commercial services

  20. so what do you need to know for next week’s test?

  21. so what do you need to know for next week’s test? • Zero sum thinking

  22. so what do you need to know for next week’s test? • Zero sum thinking • Examples of “loaded” language such as “favorable trade balance,” “globalization,” “record trade deficit”

  23. so what do you need to know for next week’s test? • Zero sum thinking • Examples of “loaded” language such as “favorable trade balance,” “globalization,” “record trade deficit” • How can both sides gain in international trade?

  24. so what do you need to know for next week’s test? • Zero sum thinking • Examples of “loaded” language such as “favorable trade balance,” “globalization,” “record trade deficit” • How can both sides gain in international trade? • The three advantages: absolute, comparative and economies of scale

  25. next week’s test • Know your trade fallacies

  26. next week’s test • Know your trade fallacies • Low-wage and high-wage countries can’t trade

  27. next week’s test • Know your trade fallacies • Low-wage and high-wage countries can’t trade • Need restrictions to ‘save jobs’

  28. next week’s test • Know your trade fallacies • Low-wage and high-wage countries can’t trade • Need restrictions to ‘save jobs’: study Hawley-Smoot

  29. next week’s test • Know your trade fallacies • Low-wage and high-wage countries can’t trade • Need restrictions to ‘save jobs’: study Hawley-Smoot • Protect infant industries

  30. next week’s test • Know your trade fallacies • Low-wage and high-wage countries can’t trade • Need restrictions to ‘save jobs’: study Hawley-Smoot • Protect infant industries • Industry needed for national defense

  31. next week’s test • Know your trade fallacies • Low-wage and high-wage countries can’t trade • Need restrictions to ‘save jobs’: study Hawley-Smoot • Protect infant industries • Industry needed for national defense • Stop ‘dumping’ of good into our country

  32. next week’s test • Types of trade restrictions: tariffs, import quotas, red tape

  33. next week’s test • Types of trade restrictions: tariffs, import quotas, red tape • How does wealth move between nations

  34. next week’s test • Types of trade restrictions: tariffs, import quotas, red tape • How does wealth move between nations • I Design Big Refrigerators in France

  35. next week’s test • Types of trade restrictions: tariffs, import quotas, red tape • How does wealth move between nations • I Design Big Refrigerators in France • Investments, Deposits, Bonds, Remittances, Imperialism, Foreign aid

  36. next week’s test • Types of trade restrictions: tariffs, import quotas, red tape • How does wealth move between nations • I Design Big Refrigerators in France • Investments, Deposits, Bonds, Remittances, Imperialism, Foreign aid • IMG and World Bank

  37. next week’s test • Types of trade restrictions: tariffs, import quotas, red tape • How does wealth move between nations • I Design Big Refrigerators in France • Investments, Deposits, Bonds, Remittances, Imperialism, Foreign aid • IMG and World Bank • Emigrants and immigrants

  38. next week’s test • Types of trade restrictions: tariffs, import quotas, red tape • How does wealth move between nations • I Design Big Refrigerators in France • Investments, Deposits, Bonds, Remittances, Imperialism, Foreign aid • IMG and World Bank • Emigrants and immigrants • WSJ story: “We’ve become a nation of takers”

More Related