1 / 17

Food Security Response Analysis driven by FS Analysis Karamoja experience

Food Security Response Analysis driven by FS Analysis Karamoja experience. Current and Projected Situation Analysis. Response Analysis. Response Planning. Response Implementation. Monitoring and Evaluation. RA starts on the SA outputs.

naoko
Download Presentation

Food Security Response Analysis driven by FS Analysis Karamoja experience

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Food Security Response Analysis driven by FS Analysis Karamoja experience

  2. Current and Projected Situation Analysis Response Analysis Response Planning Response Implementation Monitoring and Evaluation RA starts on the SA outputs IPC focuses on Situation Analysis with strong links to Response Analysis Strong, clear transition wins the race!

  3. Composition of the Response Analysis Team RA is not an IPC business, ? IPC TWG members

  4. IPC February 2013 – Karamoja Region Key for Map Acute Food Insecurity Phase Minimal 1 Stressed 2 Crisis 3 4 Emergency Famine 5 Areas with Inadequate Evidence Not Analyzed Urban/Settlement Area would likely be at least 1 Phase worse without the effects of humanitarian assistance

  5. Beyond the map, manyevidence on FS- Zoom on FS outcomesstatus (Napak case)

  6. Details on some key indicators – Nutrition evidence, GAM & Stunting trend

  7. IPC Result - FS limiting factors Summary

  8. IPC Analytical Framework – figure for Napak IPC products Food Security Contributing Factors • Non Food Security Specific Contributing Factors: • Disease • Water/Sanitation • Health Social Services • others…. Causal Factors • Vulnerability: (Exposure, Susceptibility, and Resilience to specific hazards events or ongoing conditions). • Livelihood Strategies (food & income sources, coping, & expenditures) • Livelihood Assets (human, financial, social, physical, & natural) • Policies, Institutions, and Processes & Food Security Outcomes (directly measured or inferred from contributing factors) 20 Outcomes Acute Events or Ongoing Conditions (natural, socio-economic, conflict, disease and others) Feedback Mortality Nutritional Status Impact Food Security Dimensions Stability (at all times) 10 Outcomes Availability Production Wild Foods Food Reserves Markets Transportation Access Physical Access Financial Access Social Access Utilization Food Preferences Food Preparation Feeding Practices Food Storage Food Safety Water Access Livelihood Change Assets & Strategies Food Consumption Quantity & Nutritional Quality Classification of Acute Phase (current or projected) and Chronic Level

  9. VisionIPC based – case of Karamoja/ Napak Actual situation Vision

  10. Vision ? • Prices analysis ? • Early warning system information? • Food Security Assessment ?

  11. Karamoja case STEPS FOR RESPONSE ANALYSIS

  12. Step 1 : Understand main issues driving FS outcomes • FS/nutrition issues • Population(s) of concern • Barriers

  13. Step 2: Understand direct, underlying and basic causes of each issue and trends • Information sources: • From IPC products and evidence used for classification (IPC framework helps in this analysis) ; • Key informant interviews • Secondary data ; • Causal analysis • FS contributingfactors; • Underlying direct and basic causes of each issue. • Trends: Brief description and history of the concerned population versus their livelihood : socio-cultural issues, political, habit, main food, education ;

  14. Step 2, example : Understanding the issues leading to current FS and N outcomes WHY ? • Quality/diversity of food • Income resources for poor people • Water access (quality and quantity) • Sanitation • How pastoralists are losing the animals even after a good crop season.

  15. Step 3. Options for solving the identified problem – Opportunities - Strategies • Options (short – mid – long term) ; • Opportunities to achieve each option (existing potential on Livelihoods assets - physical, human, financial, social, natural, cultural, political, experience -) ; • Existing strategies .

  16. Step 4. Implementation of Response Analysis Options, coordination and responsibilities • Key activities /strategies and timing • Existing opportunities • Activities and potentialactors • Coodination issues

  17. Lessons learned • Unit of analysis must bewellidentified : Household groups, district ; • The team of RA must bewelltrained and planning must be good ; • Many FS assues are interconnected, need to understandthis to respondappropriately; • Hugeneed to summarize and sort throughfindings; • Response options are linked: short to long term; • Need to have a furtherstepbetweensteps 3 & step 4 – Gap analysis.

More Related