Ensuring valid priority rights in europe
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 12

Ensuring Valid Priority Rights in Europe PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 67 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Ensuring Valid Priority Rights in Europe. Richard Johnson Member of the International Liaison Committee (Non-European). IN ASSOCIATION WITH. Ensuring Valid Priority Rights in Europe. What is the issue? Review of recent case law EPO United Kingdom France Germany

Download Presentation

Ensuring Valid Priority Rights in Europe

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Ensuring valid priority rights in europe

Ensuring Valid Priority Rights in Europe

Richard Johnson

Member of the International Liaison Committee

(Non-European)

IN ASSOCIATION WITH


Ensuring valid priority rights in europe1

Ensuring Valid Priority Rights in Europe

  • What is the issue?

  • Review of recent case law

    • EPO

    • United Kingdom

    • France

    • Germany

  • Practical considerations


What is the issue

What is the issue?

  • Priority claim validity is not a closed matter

    • Open to re-examination in validity action

  • Inconsistent approach to applicable law

    • Lex originis v Lex protectionis

  • Strict time frame for compliance

    • Deficiencies cannot be fixed later


Review of case law epo

Review of case law - EPO

  • T 62/05

  • Nihon GE Plastics K.K. → General Electric Company

  • High standard of proof for assignment

    • Analogy to application transfers (Article 72 EPC)

    • In writing, signed by both parties

  • No assignment document; no valid priority claim

  • Inconsistency with earlier case law (T 1008/96)

    • No account taken of applicable local law

    • Possible reference to Enlarged Board?


Review of case law epo1

Review of case law - EPO

  • T 788/05

  • “A person” & “first application”

  • Earlier case : Terumo & Tokin

    • Not “first application” for later priority claim by Terumo only

  • Priority right belongs “simultaneously and jointly” to joint applicants


Review of case law uk

Review of case law - UK

  • Edwards Lifesciences AG v Cook Biotech Inc.

  • Original applicants included non-employee inventors

  • Assignment done after PCT application filed

    • Too late!

  • Cook owned a share of the priority right

    • But not enough!


Review of case law uk1

Review of case law - UK

  • KCI Licensing Inc v Smith & Nephew plc

  • First application: inventor applicant

  • Subsequent application: employer applicant & subsidiary

  • General agreement assigning future inventions

    • Acceptable as transfer of priority right

  • Adding co-applicant for subsequent application

    • Right of priority shared through action of the parties


Review of case law france

Review of case law - France

  • Magic Technologies v Swisscom AG

  • First application: Swiss inventors

  • Subsequent application: Swiss employer company

  • Transfer document

    • Before filing of subsequent application

    • Transferred all rights “for the US”

  • No valid priority claim

    • Express mention of transfer of right of priority required

    • Despite transfer being effective under Swiss law


Review of case law germany

Review of case law - Germany

  • Bundespatentgericht decision 11 W (pat) 14/09

  • Right of priority can validly transfer before the formal transfer of the other rights to the invention

  • Transfer must occur before subsequent application is filed


Practical considerations

Practical considerations

  • Assess chain of title to right of priority before subsequent application is filed

  • If applicants are different, obtain a specific agreement

    • In writing

    • Expressly mentioning the right of priority

    • Signed by both parties

    • Executed at least one day before the subsequent application is filed


Practical considerations1

Practical considerations

  • If in doubt, and no agreement exists, name the same applicant

    • Deferring the addition of a priority claim until later probably no help


For more information please contact

For more information please contact:

Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys

95 Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1DT

Telephone: +44 (0) 207 405 9450

Email: [email protected]

www.cipa.org.uk

Richard Johnson

MEWBURN ELLIS LLP

33 Gutter Lane, London EC2V 8AS

Telephone: +44 (0) 207 776 5300

Email: [email protected]

www.mewburn.com

IN ASSOCIATION WITH


  • Login