1 / 4

Some Historical Issues with the Proton Source

Some Historical Issues with the Proton Source. Design predates good modeling tools. Historically seen as “workhorse” of the lab. Not always productive interaction between linac and booster. Booster. 400 MeV “DMZ”. Linac. Jumping on the Restructuring Bandwagon…. Proton Source Department.

naeva
Download Presentation

Some Historical Issues with the Proton Source

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Some Historical Issues with the Proton Source • Design predates good modeling tools. • Historically seen as “workhorse” of the lab. • Not always productive interaction between linac and booster. Booster 400 MeV “DMZ” Linac BooNE Meeting, Dec 5, 2003 - Prebys

  2. Jumping on the Restructuring Bandwagon… Proton Source Department New • New group. Responsibilies: • Coordinate modeling and studies • Address global issues BooNE Meeting, Dec 5, 2003 - Prebys

  3. Some Specific Responsibilities within Department • Doug Moehs, Ray Hren: ion source • Lester Wahl: old linac RF (7835’s) • Al Moretti: new linac RF (klystrons) • Elliott McCrory: linac control loops • Larry Allen: Linac tuning • Jim Lackey: Everything Booster • Roy Mraz: Booster power supplies • Bill Pellico: Low-level RF • Ray Tomlin: Booster tuning • Chuck Ankenbrandt: Coordinates studies, liaison (and filter) to other beam physics people. BooNE Meeting, Dec 5, 2003 - Prebys

  4. Issues to be resolved • Too many things overly “expert-dependent”. • Too many things “right-brained”. • Reproducibility still a big issue. BooNE Meeting, Dec 5, 2003 - Prebys

More Related