Loading in 5 sec....

Combining CMB, SnIa and weak lensing to study quitessence models work in progressPowerPoint Presentation

Combining CMB, SnIa and weak lensing to study quitessence models work in progress

Download Presentation

Combining CMB, SnIa and weak lensing to study quitessence models work in progress

Loading in 2 Seconds...

- 102 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

Combining CMB, SnIa and weak lensing to study quitessence models work in progress

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Combining CMB, SnIa and weak lensing to study quitessence modelswork in progress

Carlo Schimd

IAP DAPNIA / CEA Saclay

I.Tereno, J.-P.Uzan, Y.Mellier, A.Riazuelo (IAP), L.vanWaerbeke (British Columbia Univ.)

In collaboration with:

December 2005 EDENINPARIS

Aim: modelslow-z effects of quintessence

SNe + cosmic shear

Aim: modelslow-z effects of quintessence

SNe + cosmic shear

2pts statistics

with respect to L , quintessence modify

- angular distanceq(z); 3D2D projection
- growth factor amplitude of 3D L/NL power spectrum
amplitude + shape of 2D spectra

20%

10%

z=1

K = 0

non-linear regime models

- N-body: ...
- mappings: stable clustering, halo model, etc.:

e.g. Peacock & Dodds (1996)

Smith et al. (2002)

NLPm(k,z) = f[LPm(k,z)]

calibrated with LCDM N-body sim, 5-10% agreement

Huterer & Takada (2005)

Ansatz: for every z we can use them, being dc, bias, c, etc. not so much dependent on cosmology

Q: dependence of 3D NL power spectrum on w ?

McDonald, Trac, Contaldi (2005)

- normalization to high-z (CMB):

the modes k enter in non-linear regime ( s(k)1 ) at different time 3D non-linear power spectrum is modified 2D shear power spectrum is modified by

no more s8

pipeline models

Boltzmann code

by A.Riazuelo

background dynamics

+ linear perturbations

in fCDM

*

*

w-lensing code

by C.S.

- NNL mappings
- 2pts statistics
- tomography

Riazuelo & Uzan (2002)

C.S., Uzan & Riazuelo (2004)

*

SNe + cosmic shear

data analysis

*

grid method

- Q models: inverse power law with/without SUGRA corrections

- (restricted) parameter space:{WQ, a, ns, zsource}

- fixed parameters: flat universe, h=0.72,Wbh2 =0.024, treion=0.17

*

They include larger framework: scalar-tensor theories of gravitation / extended quintessence models

*

CMB can be taken into account at no cost

dataset models

- CMB: TT anisotropy spectrum @ WMAP initial conditions/

normalization

- SNe: “goldset”

Riess et al. (2004)

VanWaerbeke, Mellier, Hoekstra (2004)

- cosmic shear: VIRMOS-Descart
+

CFHTLS deep

Semboloni et al. (2005)

+ CFHTLS wide (sim)

Hoekstra et al. (2005): 22deg2

Fu’s talk

<z> 0.92, 1.0, 0.76

ngal 15, 23, 20 /arcmin2

area 8.5, 2.1, 170 deg2

wl observables: top-hat variance; aperture mass variance

cosmic shear: by wide-field imager/DUNE-like satellite mission

deep survey : models effects ofL-NL mapping

VIRMOS-Descart + CFHTLS deep

CFHTLS wide

*

*

*

ns

ns

ns

top-hat variance

WQ

WQ

WQ

low resolution effect. High-res in progress

ns

ns

ns

*

a

a

a

halo model

stable clustering

Smith et al. (2002)

Peacock & Dodds (1996)

primordial universe (ns): because of high-z normalization, constraints strongly depend on L-NL mapping NL regime (integrated effect) wide angular scales are needed

quintessence: no relevant differences due to L-NL mapping in deep surveys

wide survey : models Q - geometrical effects

q > 20 arcmin

a

*

top-hat variance

WQ

WQ

WQ

q > 20 arcmin

ns

DE is more sensible to the geometrical factor

WQ

WQ

WQ

q > 20 arcmin

low resolution effect

ns

ns

ns

*

a

a

stable clustering

halo model

Peacock & Dodds (1996)

Smith et al. (2002)

cosmic shear + SNe : Q equation of state models

CFHTLS wide

SNe “goldset”

Map2, Smith et al.

a

a

WQ

WQ

- dynamical model of quintessence (scalar field):
wQ = wQ(WQ, a) -- no parameterization e.g. à la Linder

- comparison to parameterized models:
translation (WQ, a) wQ(z*), dwQ/da(z*) [z_pivot technique]

dark energy by Fisher matrix analysis models

SNe

“goldset”

TT @ CMB

WMAP 1yr

CFHTLS wide:

top-hat variance; L-NL: Smith et al.

- A= 170 deg2
- ngal = 20/arcmin2

Remark: * = fiducial model

DUNE-like:

- A= 20000 deg2
- ngal = 35/arcmin2

Refregier’s talk

conclusions & prospects models

- quintessence at low-z by Sne + cosmic shear,using high-z informations (CMB/Cl normalization)
- pipeline: Boltzmann code + lensing code + data analysis by grid method:

dynamical models of DE (not parameterization): fCDM

for the first time cosmic shear data to this task (Fu’s talk)

improvement: bigger parameter space

1. combining also CMB data (high-z effects of DE);

2. MCMC analysis;

3. deviation from GR, e.g. EQ wQ < -1

Martin, C.S., Uzan. (2005)

- NL regime: L-NL mappings (caveat)

some parameters (nS) are sensible to L-NL mappings ( integrated effect ?), Q parameters feel only geometry

wide field surveys are needed DUNE (Refregier’s talk)

Work in progress:

- analysis of realistic (=dynamical) models of DE using severalparameters

other techniques: cross-correlations, tomography

in collaboration with: I.Tereno, Y.Mellier , J.-P. Uzan, R. Lehoucq, A. Refregier & DUNE team

Thank you models

...DUNE : Fisher matrix analysis models

WMAP 1yr

+

- CFHTLS wide:
- A= 170 deg2
- ngal = 20/arcmin2

- DUNE:
- A= 20000 deg2
- ngal = 35/arcmin2

top-hat variance; L-NL: Smith et al