1 / 20

PRO-CTCAE Task 8 Committee: Feasibility Research

PRO-CTCAE Task 8 Committee: Feasibility Research. March 18 th 2011 (11am EST) Kickoff Telecon. Agenda. 1 – Introductions 2 – Overview of PRO-CTCAE Task 8/SOW* 3 – Research questions/goals 4 – Protocols: Eribulin* (CALGB) and Manuka Honey (RTOG) 5 – Timeline

nadine
Download Presentation

PRO-CTCAE Task 8 Committee: Feasibility Research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PRO-CTCAE Task 8 Committee: Feasibility Research March 18th 2011 (11am EST) Kickoff Telecon

  2. Agenda 1 – Introductions 2 – Overview of PRO-CTCAE Task 8/SOW* 3 – Research questions/goals 4 – Protocols: Eribulin* (CALGB) and Manuka Honey (RTOG) 5 – Timeline 6 – Next call: Friday, 4/1/2011

  3. CTCAE • Lexicon of about 800 items to characterize adverse events • Standard in all cancer clinical trials

  4. Adverse Reactions Table

  5. Example: Mucositis

  6. CTCAE “Symptom Items” • About 10% of CTCAE items are symptoms • Currently reported by clinical staff • Abundant evidence that staff under-reports important adverse symptom events

  7. PRO-CTCAE • In 2008, NCI contracted to develop and evaluate a patient version of the CTCAE, called the PRO-CTCAE

  8. Other “Tasks” • Survey of cancer research stakeholders • Items developed • Cultural literacy assured • Cognitive interviews • Software platform developed • Usability testing • Validation study • Feasibility assessment (that’s us!)

  9. Example: Mucositis

  10. Create Form Form Builder

  11. Manage Schedule

  12. Shaking Chills Shivering Secondary conditional item

  13. Study Reports

  14. Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the CTCAE https://wiki.nci.nih.gov/x/cKul

  15. Aim 2: Conduct Feasibility Study

  16. 2 Trials Identified • CALGB: Eribulin phase III • RTOG: Manuka Honey randomized phase II

  17. Eribulin Trial

  18. PRO-CTCAE Preliminary Design • 11 symptoms (20 items) • Fatigue, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, insomnia, sensory neuropathy, mucositis, pain, anorexia, alopecia • Administered via IVRS weekly • Subcontract with CALGB and Mayo • Aims: • 1: Discern between treatment arms • 2: Assess feasibility

  19. Feasibility • Patient-level • willing and able to self-report • satisfaction • Staff-level (CRAs, investigators) • Willing/able to register/train patients • consider this a valuable activity • Group-level and Site-level • Feasibility of implementation • Cost of implementation • Efficiency • How do we measure these?

  20. Site-Level Feasibility: In the Concept • Semi-structured interviews with study personnel at selected sites • Explore the barriers and challenges to implementation • Assess cost, technical issues, and administrative burden • DISCUSSION: How do we do this?

More Related