jet tagging studies at tev lc
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Jet Tagging Studies at TeV LC

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 17

Jet Tagging Studies at TeV LC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 84 Views
  • Uploaded on

Jet Tagging Studies at TeV LC. Tomáš Laštovička, University of Oxford Linear Collider Physics/Detector Meeting 14/9/2009 CERN. Overview. LCFI Package Monte Carlo Samples Jet Tag Performance and Comparisons Neural Net Inputs and Optimisation Physics Analyses Summary. LCFI Package.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Jet Tagging Studies at TeV LC' - naasir


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
jet tagging studies at tev lc

Jet Tagging Studies at TeV LC

Tomáš Laštovička, University of Oxford

Linear Collider Physics/Detector Meeting

14/9/2009 CERN

overview
Overview
  • LCFI Package
  • Monte Carlo Samples
  • Jet Tag Performance and Comparisons
  • Neural Net Inputs and Optimisation
  • Physics Analyses
  • Summary
lcfi package
LCFI Package
  • Used for jet flavour tagging and secondary vertex reconstruction.
  • Topological vertex finder ZVRES.
  • Standard LCIO input/output
    • Marlin environment (used for both ILD/SiD)
  • Flavour tagging based on Neural Nets.
    • Combine several variables (more details later)

Probability Tubes

Vertex Function

monte carlo samples
Monte Carlo Samples
  • Generated with CalcHEP 2.5.j
    • 500GeV, 1TeV, 2TeV, 3TeV center of mass energy
    • di-jets (e+e- → qqbar) with ISR, no beamstrahlung
  • Decayed and fragmented with Pythia 6.4.10
  • 50k events for b,c and {u,d,s}
    • event weights are accounted for
  • s-channel events frequently intensively “boosted” along z-axis due to high energy ISR
    • radiativereturn to the Z-peak
    • ~80% of s-channel b-events:

Z-peak

1TeV

2TeV

3TeV

monte carlo samples1
Monte Carlo Samples
  • Events passed to FastMC using both SiD (sid02) and CLIC (clic01_sid)geometries (a minor problem with clic01_sid in FastMC solved).
  • LCFI package run locally in Oxford (2x4x3x50k = 1.2M events in about 2 days)

3TeV

bB-event

vtx+tracker

500gev sid
500GeV SiD
  • A comparison to the previous (LoI) SiD result done with full digitisation/simulation and beamstrahlung effects.
    • Neural Nets need to be retrained (see dashed (default NNs) vs full line)
    • b-tag slightly better while c-tag is slightly worse, generally reasonable agreement.

Fast MC, no beamstrahlung

SiD LoI, full sim/dig/rec

c (b-bkgr)‏

b

c

3tev sid vs clic geometry
3TeV SiD vs CLIC Geometry
  • Purity vs efficiency is not the best plot to look at, it involves cross sections and various acceptance effects.
  • Nevertheless, here is a comparison of SiD and CLIC geometry at 3 TeV.
    • SiD geometry over-performs CLIC geometry due to better resolution (especially where light quarks are involved).
    • At 3TeV more b-quarks decay after 15mm (1st SiD vtx layer) – minor effect if compared to the resolution.

c (b-bkgr)‏

b

c

mistag efficiency vs b tag efficiency
Mistag Efficiency vs b-tag Efficiency
  • Mistag efficiency vs tag efficiency are less affected by cross sections/acceptance effects.
  • B-tag example (dashed = default b-tag net, full line = retrained)
    • This net was trained to separate b jets from both light and c-jets, not against c-jets only

3TeV CLIC

500GeV SiD

Effect of NN

re-training

Significantly better performance

The exact understanding of this difference is unclear at this stage.

decay vertices of b mesons
Decay Vertices of B-mesons
  • B-mesons are significantly more boosted at 3TeV.
    • And decay further from the interaction point.
    • In central region, about 9.5% of B0s decay after 15mm (1st SiD layer) and 5.5% after 30mm @ 3TeV.

Vertex detector Central barrel

1TeV

2TeV

3TeV

neural net inputs
Neural Net Inputs
  • LCFI package classifies jets in one of three Neural Nets based on #vtx
    • 1 vertex (only IP vertex), 8 Inputs
      • R-Phi and Z significance of 2 leading tracks and their momenta
      • Joint R-Phi and Z Probability
    • 2 vertices
      • Decay Length and its significance
      • Pt mass correction
      • Raw momentum
      • Number of tracks in vertices
      • Secondary vtx probability
      • Joint R-Phi and Z Probability
    • 3+ vertices, NN Inputs just as for the 2 vertices but separate NN.
important neural net inputs
Important Neural Net Inputs
  • Most relevant NN inputs are
    • joint probabilities in both R-Phi and Z coordinates
    • Pt mass corrections for cases with secondary vertices.
    • Also secondary vertex probability, raw vertex momentum etc.
lcfi package optimisation
LCFI Package Optimisation
  • Optimisation is not only a matter of Neural Net retraining. The package has plenty of parameters:
    • Track selection params
    • ZVRES params
    • Flavour Tag params
    • Vertex Charge params
physics analyses i
Physics Analyses I
  • Higgs branching ratios – Higgs-strahlung
  • H→ccbar analysis was a part of SiD/ILD LoI
  • Leading to BR uncertainty of about 8.5%.
  • High quality c-tagging required and advanced analysis.

SiD

physics analyses higgs self coupling with zhh
Physics Analyses – Higgs Self-Coupling with ZHH
  • Uncertainty on about 30% level claimed for 500 GeV ILC and 2000 fb-1
    • We could not reproduce this result due to:
      • Final state gluon radiation →
        • It was OFF in many previous studies
        • Degrades results by a factor of 2.
      • Real detector response and full set of backgrounds
        • Further degradation to 100+ %
  • If a self-coupling measurement is suppose to support the LC case, more work is definitely required.
  • At 3TeV advantage of higher luminosity, W channel.
summary

Summary

We have analysed FastMC so far: experience from LoI tells us that the full simulation and reconstruction is essential as well as a full inclusion of the beam backgrounds.

LCFI package should be optimised for 3TeV CLIC, Neural Nets retrained.

At this stage, 3TeV CLIC b- and c- tagging is not yet fully understood.

We will need to decide what approach to take for the CDR in 2010.

ad