1 / 31

Validation and diagnostics tools used in countries

Validation and diagnostics tools used in countries. Maria Derkova & Neva Pristov. HIRLAM-ALADIN workshop on physics and diagnostics, Oslo, 12-13/12/2005. ALADIN validation tools. ALADIN has specific output file format (FA), containing both spectral and gridpoint fields

myra
Download Presentation

Validation and diagnostics tools used in countries

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Validation and diagnostics tools used in countries Maria Derkova & Neva Pristov HIRLAM-ALADIN workshop on physics and diagnostics, Oslo, 12-13/12/2005

  2. ALADIN validation tools ALADIN has specific output file format (FA), containing both spectral and gridpoint fields • internal tools (available via/during model execution): • fullpos • movie • echkevo • external tools: • frodo, edf • ecto • pseudoTEMPs • ASCS • ALADIN verification project comment: usually these tools have common software basis, but visualisation part adapted by each NMS

  3. FULLPOS • the post-processing package - our main diagnostic tool • consistent with model equations (physics), interpolations, constants, climatology etc. • allows transformation to various • levels (p, z, PV, θ, model) • domains & grids (gauss, model, latlon, lelam) • multiple fields • available in-line or off-line

  4. FULLPOS NORMS • available in the output listing • output frequency controled by namelists • during integration: SPECTRAL NORMS - SURFACE PRESSURE 0.115013153860930E+02 OROGRAPHY 0.359236075962300E+04 LEV VORTICITY DIVERGENCE TEMPERATURE HUMIDITY KINETIC ENERGY AVE 0.590326020073889E-04 0.324345455324753E-04 0.246393827139165E+03 0.137562159965699E-02 0.115190052015067E+03 • specific to fullpos FULL-POS GPNORMS AVERAGE MINIMUM MAXIMUM SURFNEBUL.TOTALE/SHMU : 0.478621864507254E+00 0.000000000000000E+00 0.999759213216640E+00 CLSVENT.ZONAL /SHMU : 0.341629148922581E+00 -.136312375001790E+02 0.120025700924380E+02 CLSVENT.MERIDIEN/SHMU : -.147638570158226E+01 -.181590558251937E+02 0.126187709690653E+02 CLSTEMPERATURE /SHMU : 0.278541842802290E+03 0.257494067681197E+03 0.295056541570276E+03 CLSMINI.TEMPERAT/SHMU : 0.278422883357361E+03 0.257322981260511E+03 0.295056541570276E+03 CLSMAXI.TEMPERAT/SHMU : 0.278667398114389E+03 0.257495090950034E+03 0.295315893483086E+03 P85000HUMI_RELAT/SHMU : 0.688819635343745E+00 0.124683427694804E+00 0.100064597246694E+01 P50000VITESSE_VE/SHMU : 0.332028473905285E-01 -.434310667219441E+01 0.874949383087379E+01 H00900THETA_P_W /SHMU : 0.276750679219078E+03 0.267592366517514E+03 0.287697023754120E+03 • check the time evolution LEV VORTICITY DIVERGENCE TEMPERATURE HUMIDITY KINETIC ENERGY 18H AVE 0.590326020073889E-04 0.324345455324753E-04 0.246393827139165E+03 0.137562159965699E-02 0.115190052015067E+03 19H AVE 0.590277752275588E-04 0.325598069681603E-04 0.246387724695265E+03 0.137399680684076E-02 0.114905545476164E+03 20H AVE 0.590252626199911E-04 0.326833214841227E-04 0.246381813657302E+03 0.137235481252630E-02 0.114623533467978E+03 • compare/validate different runs < SURFRESERV.GLACE/FRAN : 0.162770785915803E-040.000000000000000E+00 0.800849068831364E-01 > SURFRESERV.GLACE/FRAN : 0.162770877130463E-04 0.000000000000000E+000.800849293445569E-01

  5. pseudosatellite image simulated by the thermal radiation at the model top local file fort.91 is produced during model integration via namelist switches &NAMPPC LMOVIE=.TRUE., LMOVPH=.TRUE., &NAMCT0 NFRISP=2, (frequency of animation events in time-steps) the fort.91 file is read by HARPE program which creates ppm; then mpeg movie is created from ppm files with mpeg_encode HARPE program (author P. LAMBOLEY) is controlled via namelist: max size for pictures (pixels) number of pictures to generate, frequency picture files format : RIG, RAW, PGM, PPM, GIF, ASC or BIN projection: Cylindrique,Stereo polaire,Orthographique,Aladin selection of colors (palette)… MOVIE

  6. MOVIE: example in grey color (by N. Pristov)

  7. ECHKEVO check/diagnostics of the gridpoint evolution • enables to print out (into external FA file ICMSH${EXPN}CHKOUT2) the values of defined model variables at predefined points • &NAMCHK • LECHKEVO=.TRUE., • NFRQCHK, NGPCHK, NXCHK(i), NYCHK(i), NFLDCHK, NFLDCHK(j) • needs external program to get ascii output (fort.70) • visualisation (by e.g. xmgrace) • does it work in CY28T3?

  8. ECHKEVO – example 1usage of digital filter time evolution of the surface pressure, point [40,60]

  9. ECHKEVO – example 2work of M. Tudor: stability testsPBL height diagnosed via Ri

  10. ECHKEVO – example 2Linear instability tests – acpluie(by M. Tudor) reference test The pictures showtime evolution of temperature on the two lowest model levels and the difference between them for one chosen point.The values for each time-step are presented, x-axis represents hours of the integration and y axis temperature in Kelvin.

  11. ECHKEVO – example 2 (cont)Linear instability tests - acpluie • EVAP=0, FONT=0, evaporation and melting were switched off – fibrillations completely disappeared • FONT=0, melting switched off, fibrillations occurred with the same intensity as in basic test • EVAP=0, evaporation switched off,fibrillations completely disappeared

  12. ECHKEVO – example 3 (cont)Linear instability tests - acpluie stability hidden in the evaporation of snow computations of the acpluie => decreasing the ratio of the speed of evaporation of precipitation ice/water REVGSL (80=> 4-15)

  13. Comparison of single point values to measurements(by M. Tudor) Comparison of the modelled 2m temperature evolution for 00 UTC run on 14th December 2004 with measured data from synoptic station with operational radiation scheme (left) andincluding NER (right). reference rand max rm+new RH XR cloud random old RH

  14. PALADIN • Portable Auxillary Library And Development tools for aladIN • package by J.-D. Gril • portable version of fa/lfi and eggx + tools modules, makefiles • contains various utilities (frodo, edf, ecto, pseudo, domolalo, coneo) • http://www.cnrm.meteo.fr/aladin/concept/tools.html

  15. Tools to check the FA file • FRODO checks the header of the file • geometry, dates, vertical levels, fields • usage: FRODO FA_file • EDF (Edit Field) prints out the values at the gridpoints (even of spectral fields!) • control via namelist (fields, levels, zoom…) • usage: EDF namelist FA_file(s) • example of output: LON LAT SURFIND.TERREMER SPECSURFGEOPOTEN S022TEMPERATURE -10.07 44.95 0.0000000 -13.1869965 279.9895866 -9.92 44.97 0.0000000 21.8817933 279.9214952 -9.76 44.99 0.0000000 -8.8118075 279.8732009 ............... • http://www.cnrm.meteo.fr/aladin/concept/docEDF.v1.10

  16. n k m ECTOplasme • computes spectral energy for the effective wave number over the slices of the ellipse • control via namelist (variables, levels, wave numbers) • usage: ecto namelist FA_file(s) • output is the ascii file [x, y1 (y2, y3...)] to be visualised (e.g. by xmgrace) • http://www.cnrm.meteo.fr/aladin/concept/docECTO.v1.10

  17. (by F. Vana – SLHD) ECTOplasme – examples

  18. pseudo • production of the parts B and D of the prognostic TEMP (pseudoTEMP, psTEMP) messages for predefined set of points (file GEOIN) • usage: pseudo list_of_files • example: IIBB SKBRA 56069 98000 99482 10172 17987 01771 00981 02806 11979 02808 22974 03610 33965 03810 44953 03608 55939 03205 66922 02604 77902 01805 88880 01006 99856 00108 11830 01709 22802 03310 33773 05112 44742 06514 55710 08117 66677 10122 77643 12727 88608 15728 99572 18726 11536 21726 22500 25128 33463 29131 44427 33736 55391 38739 66355 44542 77320 51339 88286 57939 99253 58161 11220 54575 22189 53195 33159 54199 44131 56791 55105 59387 21212 00981 02506 11979 02507 22974 03009 33965 04011 44953 05011 55939 05512 66922 06012 77902 07012 88880 07511 99856 08010 11830 08509 22802 09509 33773 10509 44742 12510 55710 14012 66677 15014 77643 15514 88608 16015 99572 17018 11536 18023 22500 18529 33463 18536 44427 19042 55391 19047 66355 20054 77320 20062 88286 21067 99253 22058 11220 23041 22189 23032 33159 24030 44131 24529 55105 25531= IIDD SKBRA 5606/ 98000 99482 10172 17987 01771 11812 60786 22589 62386 33389 63786 44212 63791 55050 367// 21212 11812 26532 22589 27537 33389 28541 44212 28055 55050 27157= • further processing usually based on HRID program: • time/z cross-section • vertical and time interpolations • computation of additional derived energy, thermodynamics and stability parameters • visualisation (originally NCAR-based) • advantage if HRID processing/visualisation is used also for TEMP

  19. psTEMP & HRID visualisation: cold front passage(by J. Masek)

  20. psTEMP & TEMP &HRID visualisation: validation of new model version (J. Masek & M. Derkova) psTEMP: old_oper psTEMP: new_oper TEMP station Vienna 19/03/2005

  21. psTEMP & TEMP &HRID visualisation: validation of new model version (J. Masek & M. Derkova) TEMP psTEMP: old_oper psTEMP: new_oper station Vienna 19/03/2005

  22. ASCS ALADIN VERTICAL (SPACE) CROSS SECTION • needs input postprocessed to model levels, containing surface geopotential, the model levels geopotential, plus any other field on model levels. All these fields should be in grid-points, i.e. special fullpos has to be run prior to ASCS • ASCS plots these fields/variables on the vertical plane between two selected geographical points (portion of the circle on the geographical sphere) • driven by namelist with possible tcl/tk interface • (originally) based on ncar graphics

  23. ASCS: example of bura wind event in Adriatic sea (by N. Pristov)

  24. SLHD OPER ANALYSIS SLHD & case study of the false forecast of the Adriatic cyclone (by F. Vana)

  25. OPER SLHD ANALYSIS ASCS & case study of the false forecast of the Adriatic cyclone (by F. Vana & A. Simon)

  26. oper 9km 2.5km 2.5km NH ASCS: 19/11/2004 case study of the High Tatras severe windstorm - downslope wind (by A. Simon & J. Vivoda)

  27. ALADIN Verification Project (AVP)seen as a tool for model validation • common ALADIN project operated in Slovenia: ww.arso.gov.si/verification/ • data from operational models and parallel suites collected • client software installed at NMSs, data sent via e-mail & stored in database • web user interface to plot the scores (predefined set of bulletins once per month planned) • currently in testing mode (performance problems)

  28. AVP: example of possible usage • ALADIN “EPS multimodel meteogram” • for selected station • for selected variables

  29. AVP: example of various models forecasts

More Related