1 / 113

Lecture 5: 2-d models and phase-plane analysis

Lecture 5: 2-d models and phase-plane analysis. references: Gerstner & Kistler, Ch 3 Koch, Ch 7. Reduced models. In HH, m is much faster than n, h. Reduced models. In HH, m is much faster than n, h. Reduced models. In HH, m is much faster than n, h. Try 2-d system:.

murray
Download Presentation

Lecture 5: 2-d models and phase-plane analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lecture 5: 2-d models and phase-plane analysis • references: Gerstner & Kistler, Ch 3 Koch, Ch 7

  2. Reduced models In HH, m is much faster than n, h

  3. Reduced models In HH, m is much faster than n, h

  4. Reduced models In HH, m is much faster than n, h • Try 2-d system:

  5. Reduced models In HH, m is much faster than n, h • Try 2-d system: membrane potential eqn:

  6. Reduced models In HH, m is much faster than n, h • Try 2-d system: membrane potential eqn: Dynamics of w (like n):

  7. Reduced models In HH, m is much faster than n, h • Try 2-d system: membrane potential eqn: Dynamics of w (like n): (from now on V -> u, C=1):

  8. Nullclines

  9. Nullclines u-nullcline w-nullcline

  10. Nullclines u-nullcline w-nullcline

  11. Nullclines u-nullcline w-nullcline intersections: fixed points

  12. Stability of fixed points For a general system

  13. Stability of fixed points For a general system Expand around FP:

  14. Stability of fixed points For a general system Expand around FP:

  15. Stability of fixed points For a general system Expand around FP: or

  16. Stability of fixed points For a general system Expand around FP: or where

  17. Stability of fixed points For a general system Expand around FP: or where

  18. linearization set

  19. linearization set Find eigenvectors v and eigenvalues l

  20. linearization set Find eigenvectors v and eigenvalues l Stability if l1, l2 both < 0

  21. linearization set Find eigenvectors v and eigenvalues l Stability if l1, l2 both < 0 i.e., l1+ l2 = trM< 0(Fu + Gw < 0) and l1l2 = det M > 0 (FuGw – FwGu > 0)

  22. linearization set Find eigenvectors v and eigenvalues l Stability if l1, l2 both < 0 i.e., l1+ l2 = trM< 0(Fu + Gw < 0) and l1l2 = det M > 0 (FuGw – FwGu > 0) If det M < 0, both eigenvalues are real, one >0, the other <0:

  23. linearization set Find eigenvectors v and eigenvalues l Stability if l1, l2 both < 0 i.e., l1+ l2 = trM< 0(Fu + Gw < 0) and l1l2 = det M > 0 (FuGw – FwGu > 0) If det M < 0, both eigenvalues are real, one >0, the other <0: Saddle point

  24. Linearized equations: case A

  25. Linearized equations: case A

  26. Linearized equations: case A

  27. Linearized equations: case A

  28. Linearized equations: case A  stable FP

  29. Case B:

  30. Case B: Now make a > 0:

  31. Case B: Now make a > 0: Lose stability if a > e or a > b

  32. Case B: Now make a > 0: Lose stability if a > e or a > b Consider a < b:

  33. Case B: Now make a > 0: Lose stability if a > e or a > b Consider a < b:

  34. Case B: Now make a > 0: Lose stability if a > e or a > b Consider a < b: a< e: stable FP

  35. Case B: Now make a > 0: Lose stability if a > e or a > b Consider a < b: a< e: stable FP a> e: unstable (both eigenvalues have positive real parts)

  36. Case C: Now consider a > b > 0:

  37. Case C: Now consider a > b > 0:

  38. Case C: Now consider a > b > 0: det M < 0

  39. Case C: Now consider a > b > 0: det M < 0 1 eigenvalue positive, 1 negative

  40. Case C: Now consider a > b > 0: det M < 0 1 eigenvalue positive, 1 negative: saddle point

  41. Case D:

  42. Case D:

  43. Case D:

  44. Case D: det M < 0  saddle point

  45. Poincare-Bendixson theorem If

  46. Poincare-Bendixson theorem If • You have a repulsive fixed point • (both eigenvalues have positive real parts)

  47. Poincare-Bendixson theorem If • You have a repulsive fixed point • (both eigenvalues have positive real parts) (2) There is a “bounding box” with the property that all flow across it is inward

  48. Poincare-Bendixson theorem If • You have a repulsive fixed point • (both eigenvalues have positive real parts) (2) There is a “bounding box” with the property that all flow across it is inward

  49. Poincare-Bendixson theorem If • You have a repulsive fixed point • (both eigenvalues have positive real parts) (2) There is a “bounding box” with the property that all flow across it is inward Then There must be a limit cycle in between

  50. FitzHugh-Nagumo model

More Related