1 / 17

Vision for a Lake Erie Wind Energy Center

Vision for a Lake Erie Wind Energy Center. RFQ Conference March 28, 2007. Today’s Meeting. Provide overview of Lake Erie Wind Energy Center Discuss information sought in RFQ responses Answer questions from interested parties. Cuyahoga County, Ohio.

muncel
Download Presentation

Vision for a Lake Erie Wind Energy Center

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Vision for a Lake Erie Wind Energy Center RFQ Conference March 28, 2007

  2. Today’s Meeting • Provide overview of Lake Erie Wind Energy Center • Discuss information sought in RFQ responses • Answer questions from interested parties

  3. Cuyahoga County, Ohio • 459 sq. mi., ~1.3 million residents, including Cleveland and many of its suburbs • County government: • Three elected Commissioners, ~9400 employees, ~$1.4 billion budget • ~40 buildings, ~10 MW of load, currently supplied by coal power • Uncommon opportunity for wind: • Bounded on the north by Lake Erie, with very attractive wind resource (and proximity to Eastern North America load centers) • Supportive political environment: strong desire for economic development and environmental improvement, minimal public opposition

  4. Energy Task Force Cuyahoga Regional Energy Development Task Force (CREDTF) • Authorized by Commissioners in August 2006 • Mission: to generate benefits for County citizens by recommending a plan to promote advanced energy for… • Economic development: job creation through new business activity • Reduced energy expenditures by local consumers (especially with rate caps expiring end-2008) • Environmental improvement (especially air quality) • Improved image: from “Burning River” Rust Belt to “Green City on a Blue Lake” • First priority: exploring offshore wind energy deployment and R&D potential in Lake Erie

  5. CREDTF Members • Bill Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecutor (Chair) • Steve Dever, Cuyahoga County Prosecutor’s Office (Secretary) • Paul Oyaski, Director, Cuyahoga County Department of Development • Robert Klaiber, Cuyahoga County Engineer • Paul Alsenas, Cuyahoga County Planning Commission • Andrew Watterson, Manager of Sustainability, City of Cleveland • Matt Zone, Councilman, City of Cleveland • Michael Wager, Vice Chair of Cleveland/Cuyahoga Port Authority • Hon. Deborah Sutherland, Mayor of Bay Village • Clarence Rogers, Former Commissioner, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio • Richard Stuebi, BP Fellow, The Cleveland Foundation • Susan Luria, VP of Attraction/Retention, Team NEO • Dr. Larry Viterna, NASA Glenn Research Center • Linda Abraham-Silver, Executive Director, Great Lakes Science Center • Dave Rosenberg, Manager, Market Development, GE Energy • Dr. Saurabh Lawate, Commercial Manager, The Lubrizol Corporation • Sohan Uppal, VP Technology, Eaton Fluid Power Group • Jack Myslenski, EVP, Parker Hannifin Corporation • Dave Nash, McMahon DeGulis LLP • Lou McMahon, Thompson Hine

  6. Lake Erie Wind Resource

  7. Great Lakes Wind Potential • Enormous market opportunity for wind energy in Great Lakes: • But, no company or region in leading position to exploit: • Few offshore projects completed to date, all in Europe and in saltwater (not freshwater) • Selected manufacturers (GE, Vestas, Siemens) with still-modest experience, a few others (e.g., Enercon, RePower) developing products Source: “The Great Lakes as a Regional Renewable Energy Source” by David Bradley, February 2004, www.greengold.org/wind

  8. Lake Erie Wind Energy Center • 5-20 megawatt demonstration offshore wind project for energy production and monitoring & diagnostics (M&D) • R&D center for testing new wind technologies (blades, gearboxes, towers, etc.) designed for offshore application

  9. Wind Project • 5-20 megawatts (2-10 turbines) 3-5 miles offshore downtown Cleveland: • Energy production • Monitoring and diagnostics (M&D) for continuing technical advancement • Objectives: • Proof of concept (regulatory precedents and improved economics) to stimulate development of Great Lakes wind • Visual icon for area • Reduced reliance on coal for local electric generation  reduced air emissions

  10. Arch Grid Potential Sites

  11. “The Crib” Water Intake • Fixed permanent platform about 3 miles offshore downtown Cleveland – only such resource in Great Lakes • Collecting wind and other meteorological data continuously since May 2005 at 50 meters • Ample power (PV and batteries) for further monitoring equipment

  12. R&D Center • Testbed for commercializing freshwater offshore wind technologies: • Open-access facility for research clients • Ability to calibrate results with nearby offshore wind project facing same wind/weather/water regime • Designed for applied product engineering by industrial partners • Potential configuration(s): • Buildings/facilities for subcomponents (e.g., drive train center) • “Plug-and-play” test towers just onshore • Pre-wired/pre-permitted offshore plots • Other? • Objectives: • Economic development: attractor of research, entrepreneurial and manufacturing activity in wind technologies and products/services • Recognition of area as an important center of North American wind industry

  13. Local R&D Strengths • Substantial research capabilities: • Cleveland offshore “Crib” with monitoring equipment • NASA-Glenn’s wind tunnels and icing research/testing equipment • Northwest Ohio Wind Coastal Initiative • U. of Toledo’s Lake Erie Center for environmental/ecological impacts (marine, avian) • Academic excellence in materials science research • Deepwater port infrastructure for installation/logistics management • Local supply chain and R&D expertise: • Bearings: Timken, Rotek • Blades and materials: MFG, Owens-Corning, Sherwin-Williams • Drive trains: Eaton • Control systems: Parker-Hannifin • Lubricants: Lubrizol • Casting, machining and fabrication: Many companies

  14. “Buy-down” to make output of project competitive in local energy markets: Grants from Cuyahoga County, Cleveland Foundation, Port Authority, others Ohio and Federal participation Discounted equipment from suppliers (valuable R&D, high-visibility) Standard windfarm financing structures: Cuyahoga County: power purchase agreement Public sector: OAQDA financing, CREBs, muni bonds Private sector: project finance and equity (to monetize PTC) REC’s? Ohio Third-Frontier R&D-grant program (potentially deca-million dollars for establishment of dedicated offshore wind center) Ohio academic institutions (e.g., Case) as required “match” for Third Frontier funding Federal appropriations for R&D (DOE/NREL) Other commitments from Ohio (Gov. Strickland) and local parties Revenues from rent/lease of facility to users (discounted for long-term or block purchases) Potential Funding Sources For Wind Project For R&D Center

  15. Feasibility Study • 6-9 month feasibility study to be commissioned: • Technical/engineering issues and turbine manufacturer participation for offshore demonstration project • Environmental/siting/permitting/aesthetic issues for offshore demonstration project • R&D needs across supply chain, manufacturer interests and equipment/facility requirements for research center • Economic/financial viability for offshore project and research center • $800K funding for feasibility study being obtained • Process underway to identify/select consultants for feasibility study: • RFQ issued, due April 23 • RFP to follow

  16. RFQ Responses Due April 23 • RFP to be issued to consultants or teams that demonstrate experience across disciplines in their RFQ response: • Wind turbine manufacturers and windfarm development (especially offshore) • Offshore/marine engineering • Finance: public and private • Community engagement: aesthetics, public opinion, etc. • Avian and other environmental/siting issues • Qualification of interested parties to receive RFP will be determined by Subcommittee of CREDTF • Local participation encouraged, but RFP will not not be issued to inexperienced local consultants • Based on feedback from RFQ respondents, RFP may be structured into multiple RFPs with separate issue areas: • Technical/engineering issues and turbine manufacturer participation for offshore demonstration project • Environmental/siting/permitting/aesthetic issues for offshore demonstration project • R&D needs, manufacturer interests/demands and equipment/facility requirements for research center • Economic/financial viability for offshore project and research center

  17. For More Information • Report available at www.cuyahogacounty.us • Contact: Paul Oyaski, Director, Cuyahoga County Department of Development, (216) 443-7535, cdpxo@cuyahogacounty.us

More Related