Loading in 5 sec....

Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future ProgressPowerPoint Presentation

Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress

Download Presentation

Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress

Loading in 2 Seconds...

- 77 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar TimingCurrent Status and Future Progress

Fredrick A. Jenet

Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy

University of Texas at Brownsville

Dick Manchester

ATNF/CSIRO

Australia

George Hobbs

ATNF/CSIRO

Australia

KJ Lee

Peking U.

China

Andrea Lommen

Franklin & Marshall

USA

Shane L. Larson

Penn State

USA

Linqing Wen

AEI

Germany

John Armstrong

JPL

USA

Teviet Creighton

Caltech

USA

- Radio pulsar can directly detect gravitational waves
- How can you do that?

- What can we learn?
- Astrophysics
- Gravity

- Current State of affairs
- What can the SKA do.

- ¶2 hmn /¶2 t + 2 hmn = 4p Tmn

“Ripples in the fabric of space-time itself”

gmn = hmn + hmn

Gmn(g) = 8 p Tmn

- Pulsar timing is the act of measuring the arrival times of the individual pulses

Pulsar timing involves measuring the time-of arrival (TOA) of each individual pulse and then subtracting off the expected time-of-arrival given a physical model of the system.

R = TOA – TOAm

Timing residuals from PSR B1855+09

From Jenet, Lommen, Larson, & Wen, ApJ , May, 2004

Data from Kaspi et al. 1994

Period =5.36 ms

Orbital Period =12.32 days

1010 Msun BBH

10-12

OJ287

3C 66B

*

*

@ a distance of 20 Mpc

10-13

109 Msun BBH

@ a distance of 20 Mpc

h

10-14

SMBH Background

10-15

10-16

3 10-11

3 10-10

3 10-9

3 10-8

3 10-7

Frequency, Hz

h = W R

Rrms 1 m s

h >= 1 ms W/N1/2

Characterized by its “Characterictic Strain” Spectrum:

hc(f) = A f

gw(f) = (2 2/3 H02) f2 hc(f)2

Super-massive Black Holes:

= -2/3

A = 10-15 - 10-14 yrs-2/3

For Cosmic Strings:

= -7/6

A= 10-21 - 10-15 yrs-7/6

- Jaffe & Backer (2002)
- Wyithe & Lobe (2002)
- Enoki, Inoue, Nagashima, Sugiyama (2004)

- Damour & Vilenkin (2005)

The best limits on the background are due to pulsar timing.

For the case where gw(f) is assumed to be a constant (=-1):

Kaspi et al (1994) report gwh2 < 6 10-8 (95% confidence)

McHugh et al. (1996) report gwh2 < 9.3 10-8

Frequentist Analysis using Monte-Carlo simulations Yield

gwh2 < 1.2 10-7

The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array Project

Goal:

Time 20 pulsars with 100 nano-second residual RMS over 5 years

Current Status

Timing 20 pulsars for 2 years, 5 currently have an RMS < 300 ns

Combining this data with the Kaspi et al data yields:

= -1 : A<4 10-15 yrs-1 gwh2 < 8.8 10-9

= -2/3 : A<6.5 10-15 yrs-2/3gw(1/20 yrs)h2 < 3.0 10-9

= -7/6 : A<2.2 10-15 yrs-7/6gw(1/20 yrs)h2 < 6.9 10-9

With the SKA: 40 pulsars, 10 ns RMS, 10 years

= -1 : A<3.6 10-17gwh2 < 6.8 10-13

= -2/3 : A<6.0 10-17gw(1/10 yrs)h^2 < 4.0 10-13

= -7/6 : A<2.0 10-17gw(1/10 yrs)h^2 < 2.1 10-13

A Dream, or almost reality with SKA:

40 pulsars, 1 ns RMS, 20 years

= -2/3 : A<1.0 10-18gw(1/10 yrs)h^2 < 1.0 10-16

The expected background due to white dwarf binaries lies in the range of A = 10-18 - 10-17! (Phinney (2001))

- Individual 108 solar mass black hole binaries out to ~100 Mpc.
- Individual 109 solar mass black hole binaries out to ~1 Gpc

This is the same for all pulsars.

This depends on the pulsar.

The induced residuals for different pulsars will be correlated.

Assuming the G-wave background is isotropic:

For a set of Np pulsars, calculate all the possible correlations:

Search for the presence of h(q) in C(q):

The expected value of r is given by:

In the absence of a correlation, r will be Gaussianly distributed with:

The significance of a measured correlation is given by:

For a background of SMBH binaries: hc = A f-2/3

20 pulsars.

Single Pulsar Limit

(1 ms, 7 years)

Expected Regime

For a background of SMBH binaries: hc = A f-2/3

20 pulsars.

Single Pulsar Limit

(1 ms, 7 years)

Expected Regime

1 ms, 1 year

For a background of SMBH binaries: hc = A f-2/3

20 pulsars.

Single Pulsar Limit

(1 ms, 7 years)

Expected Regime

1 ms, 1 year

(Current ability)

.1 m s

5 years

For a background of SMBH binaries: hc = A f-2/3

20 pulsars.

Single Pulsar Limit

(1 ms, 7 years)

Expected Regime

1 ms, 1 year

(Current ability)

.1 s

10 years

.1 m s

5 years

Single Pulsar Limit

(1 ms, 7 years)

Expected Regime

1 ms, 1 year

(Current ability)

Detection SNR for a given level of the SMBH background Using 20 pulsars

hc = A f-2/3

SKA

10 ns

5 years

40 pulsars

.1 s

10 years

.1 m s

5 years

- Current solar system limits place mg < 4.4 10-22 eV
- 2 = k2 + (2 mg/h)2
- c = 1/ (4 months)
- Detecting 5 year period G-waves reduces the upper bound on the graviton mass by a factor of 15.
- By comparing E&M and G-wave measurements, LISA is expected to make a 3-5 times improvement using LMXRB’s and perhaps up to 10 times better using Helium Cataclismic Variables. (Cutler et al. 2002)

- Radio pulsars can directly detect gravitational waves
- R = h/s , 100 ns (current), 10 ns (SKA)

- What can we learn?
- Is GR correct?
- SKA will allow a high SNR measurement of the residual correlation function -> Test polarization properties of G-waves
- Detection implies best limit of Graviton Mass (15-30 x)

- The spectrum of the background set by the astrophysics of the source.
- For SMBHs : Rate, Mass, Distribution (Help LISA?)

- Is GR correct?
- Current Limits
- For SMBH, A<6.5 10-15 or gw(1/20 yrs)h2 < 3.0 10-9

- SKA Limits
- For SMBH, A<6.0 10-17 or gw(1/10 yrs)h2 < 4.0 10-13
- Dreamland: A<1.0 10-18 or gw(1/10 yrs)h2 < 1.0 10-16
- Individual 108 solar mass black hole binaries out to ~100 Mpc.
- Individual 109 solar mass black hole binaries out to ~1 Gpc