1 / 14

AME 514 Applications of Combustion

AME 514 Applications of Combustion. Lecture 3: Combustion Theory II. Outline. Conservation equations revisited 1D laminar premixed flame Assumptions Analysis Results. Conservation of energy and species. Recall from AME 513, lecture 7 (Conservation equations)

mostyn
Download Presentation

AME 514 Applications of Combustion

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AME 514Applications of Combustion Lecture 3: Combustion Theory II

  2. Outline • Conservation equations revisited • 1D laminar premixed flame • Assumptions • Analysis • Results AME 514 - Spring 2013 - Lecture 3 - Combustion Theory II

  3. Conservation of energy and species • Recall from AME 513, lecture 7 (Conservation equations) • Recall Le = k/rCPD is dimensionless– generally for gases D ≈ k/rCP ≈n, where k/rCP = a = thermal diffusivity, n = kinematic viscosity (“viscous diffusivity”) AME 514 - Spring 2013 - Lecture 3 - Combustion Theory II

  4. 1D laminar premixed flame - formulation • Also recall that while is constant, i.e. doesn’t vary with reaction • If Le is not exactly 1, small deviations in Le (thus T) will have large impact on w due to high activation energy • Energy equation may have heat loss in q’’’ term, not present in species conservation equation • Special case: 1D, steady (∂/∂t = 0), constant CP (thus ∂h/∂T = CP∂T/∂t) & constant k, rD; simplified form of Arrhenuis expression (single reactant, far from stoichiometric) • Note that Z is not the usual one based on molar concentrations,but rather based on fuel mass fraction (units 1/time) AME 514 - Spring 2013 - Lecture 3 - Combustion Theory II

  5. 1D laminar premixed flame - formulation AME 514 - Spring 2013 - Lecture 3 - Combustion Theory II

  6. 1D laminar premixed flame - solution • How to solve? • Boundary conditions: x = -∞, T = 0; x = +∞, T = 1 • Cold boundary problem – reactants occurs even at x = -∞, so are already completely reacted by x = 0, so need to assume finite domain with non-zero dT/dx slope at inflow end (equivalent to assuming a small heat loss at cold boundary) • Can’t assume dT/dx = 0 at cold boundary, reaction is too slow and would take enormous domain to reach flame front • Need to see how different values of dT/dx at cold boundary affect solution AME 514 - Spring 2013 - Lecture 3 - Combustion Theory II

  7. 1D premixed flame – numerical method • x = 0 is cold boundary (T = 0), assume finite dT/dx • “Guess” eigenvalue L • Fixed grid spacing Dx, at every subsequent grid point • Does T  1 as x  +∞? If not, adjust guess for L AME 514 - Spring 2013 - Lecture 3 - Combustion Theory II

  8. 1D premixed flame – results For typical b = 10, e = 0.2, L= 0.2 AME 514 - Spring 2013 - Lecture 3 - Combustion Theory II

  9. 1D premixed flame – results • What if Le ≠ 1? T ≠ 1 – Y, energy and species equations are not identical and are coupled AME 514 - Spring 2013 - Lecture 3 - Combustion Theory II

  10. 1D premixed flame – structure • Outside of a thin reaction zone at x = 0 • Within reaction zone – temperature does not increase despite heat release – temperature acts to change slope of temperature profile, not temperature itself AME 514 - Spring 2013 - Lecture 3 - Combustion Theory II

  11. Schematic of deflagration (from Lecture 1) • Temperature increases in convection-diffusion zone or preheat zoneahead of reaction zone, even though no heat release occurs there, due to balance between convection & diffusion • Temperature constant downstream (if adiabatic) • Reactant concentration decreases in convection-diffusion zone, even though no chemical reaction occurs there, for the same reason AME 514 - Spring 2013 - Lecture 3 - Combustion Theory II

  12. Conservation equations - comments • In limit of infinitely thin reaction zone, T does not change but dT/dx does; integrating across reaction zone • Note also that from temperature profile: • Thus, change in slope of temperature profile is a measure of the total amount of reaction – but only when the reaction zone is thin enough that convection term can be neglected compared to diffusion term AME 514 - Spring 2013 - Lecture 3 - Combustion Theory II

  13. Deflagrations - burning velocity • More rigorous analysis (Bush & Fendell, 1970) using Matched Asymptotic Expansions • Convective-diffusive (CD) zone (no reaction) of thickness d • Reactive-diffusive (RD) zone (no convection) of thickness d/b(1-e) where 1/[b(1-e)] is a small parameter • T(x) = T0(x) + T1(x)/[b(1-e)] + T2(x)/[b(1-e)]2 + … • Collect terms of same order in small parameter • Match T & dT/dx at all orders of b(1-e) where CD & RD zones meet • Same form as simple estimate (SL ~ {w}1/2, where w ~ Ze-bis an overall reaction rate, units 1/s), with additional constants • Why b-2term on reaction rate? • Reaction doesn’t occur over whole flame thickness d, only in thin zone of thickness d/b • Reactant concentration isn’t at ambient value Yi,∞, it’s at 1/b of this since temperature is within 1/b of Tad AME 514 - Spring 2013 - Lecture 3 - Combustion Theory II

  14. Deflagrations - burning velocity • What if not a single reactant, or Le ≠ 1? Mitani (1980) extended Bush & Fendell for reaction of the form where A is the deficient reactant, e.g. fuel in a lean mixture, resulting in • Recall order of reaction (n) = A+B • Still same form as simple estimate, but now b-(n+1)term since n may be something other than 1 (as Bush & Fendell assumed) • Also have LeA-nA and LeB-nB terms – why? For fixed thermal diffusivity (a), for higher LeA, DA is smaller, gradient of YA must be larger to match with T profile, so concentration of A is higher in reaction zone AME 514 - Spring 2013 - Lecture 3 - Combustion Theory II

More Related