The Possibilities of Border Revisions in the Horn of Africa. A Comparative Study of Somalia and Suda...
Download
1 / 12

Mgr. Kateřina Rudincová - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 149 Views
  • Uploaded on

The Possibilities of Border Revisions in the Horn of Africa. A Comparative Study of Somalia and Sudan. Mgr. Kateřina Rudincová Department of Human Geography and Regional Development, University of Ostrava, Czech Republic. Methodology.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Mgr. Kateřina Rudincová' - morwen


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

The Possibilities of Border Revisions in the Horn of Africa. A Comparative Study of Somalia and Sudan.

Mgr. Kateřina Rudincová

Department of Human Geography and Regional Development, University of Ostrava, Czech Republic


Methodology
Methodology A Comparative Study of Somalia and Sudan.

  • Comparation of concepts of right to self-determination and uti possidetis

  • Application on the cases of Somalia (Somaliland) and Sudan (separation of South Sudan)

  • Semi-structured interviews at the Commission of AU, Addis Ababa 2010 and 2011

  • Interview with former foreign minister of Somaliland in 2010


Right to self determination of peoples
Right to self-determination of peoples A Comparative Study of Somalia and Sudan.

  • Right to self-determination of peoples – 14 points of President Wilson, UN Charter

  • UN General Assembly – 1960 – Resolution 1514-XV: „all peoples have the right to self determination; by virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development“

  • Right to self-determination stressed by the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) and International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

  • Conceptof self-determination challenges the current state borders in Africa


Uti possidetis
Uti possidetis A Comparative Study of Somalia and Sudan.

  • OAU Charter – 1963 – concept of inviolability of borders inherited from the colonial past

    • Paragraph 3, Article III: Member states declare their adherence to „Respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of each State and for its inalienable right to independence“

  • OAU supported emancipation of African territories within already existing borders

  • OAU Conference in Cairo – 1964 – Resolution 16(1): „all Member States pledge themselves to respect the borders existing on their achievement of national independence“

  • → principle of the right of African peoples to self-determination has been replaced by the doctrine of inviolability of African borders


Border issues in the horn of africa
Border issues in the Horn of Africa A Comparative Study of Somalia and Sudan.

  • Different secessionist units in the Horn of Africa

  • Southern Sudan – recognized by AU and international community, even though its existence violates the principle of uti possidetis

  • De facto state of Somaliland – failed to achieve international recognition, althought it meets three Montevideo criteria for independent existence – population, territory and state power


Southern sudan

Whole Sudan administered as British – Egyptian condominium A Comparative Study of Somalia and Sudan.

„Crises of national identity“ in Southern Sudan (F. Deng 2010)

British politics in Sudan: de facto separation of „African“ south from the „Arab“ north – barrier against the spread of Islam (Christian missions, English, indirect administration) → South Sudan went through different political and historical development

Southern Sudan


Civil war in sudan
Civil War in Sudan A Comparative Study of Somalia and Sudan.

  • 1956 – independence of Sudan – inherited colonial boundaries, Arab – Islamic state, marginalization of southern Sudanese ethnics → civil war

  • 1972 – peace agreement in Addis Ababa, regional authonomy

  • 1983 – Jafar Nimairi declared Sudan an Islamic state, introduced Sharia

  • Opposition groups in Southern Sudan:

    • Demand of emancipation of Southern nations - SPLM

    • Demand of independence – Anyanya II, SSIM

  • Peace negotiations, significant role of the regional powers and organizations in peace process (Nigeria, IGAD)

  • Regional dimension: Kenya x Egypt, Ethiopia - ambivalent approach

  • 9.1.2005 – conclusion of the agreement between SPLM and Sudanese government - CPA


Somaliland

former British protectorate x Southern Somalia – Italian colony → different historical and political development

26th June 1960 – independence of Somaliland, recognized by 35 states

1st July 1960 – uniting with Southern Somalia

Since 1969 – oppresive regime of Siad Barre

Decalaration of independence – 18th May 1991

Somaliland


International recognition of somaliland
International Recognition of Somaliland? colony → different historical and political development

  • Arguments of political reprezentation of Somaliland:

    • Territory of the Republic of Somaliland covers the same area as that of the former Somaliland Protectorate

    • Requires the preservation of principle of uti possidetis: „for Somaliland, independence was on 26 June 1960 and not on 1 July 1960 when it entered into a voluntary union with Somalia and the fact that the OAU Declaration was made in 1963 does not affect the application of the doctrine“

    • referendum of unity was manipulated; Atto di Unione differed from that adopted in Somaliland

    • The right to self-determination was not guaranteed fot northern clans, their human right have been violated

    • Independent existence would contribute to economic development and could possibly affect the development of whole region


Au perspective
AU perspective colony → different historical and political development

  • Somaliland has never challenged the act of unity with Southern Somalia

  • Recognize TFG as an representative of united Somalia

  • The agreement between Somaliland and Transitional Federal Government of Somalia has not been achieved

  • Unilateral secession is not acceptable

  • People of Somaliland perceived as a part of Somali nation

  • Observatory status at AU is not possible

  • Somaliland should try to gain support from the African states (but complicated regional politics)


Somaliland vs southern sudan
Somaliland vs. Southern Sudan colony → different historical and political development

  • Southern Sudan:

    • Turned on its side attention of international community – prolonged civil war

    • International Recognition of Southern Sudan – attempts to achieve stability in the region

  • Somaliland:

    • Long-term peace, creation of institutions, democratic elections, government successfully controls claimed territory

    • Clans of Somaliland are still perceived to be the part of Somali nation

    • Support of African states is crutial

  • → right to self-determination of the peoples and principle of uti possidetis are used ambivalently


Thank you for your attention
Thank you for your attention. colony → different historical and political development


ad