1 / 23

Dennis Sullivan, Ph.D. Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Idaho Moscow, ID USA

The Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) Method as the Most Practical Tool for Hyperthermia Planning?. Dennis Sullivan, Ph.D. Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Idaho Moscow, ID USA 83844-1023. Advantages of FDTD. It is a direct implementation of Maxwell’s

morgan
Download Presentation

Dennis Sullivan, Ph.D. Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Idaho Moscow, ID USA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) Method as the Most Practical Tool for Hyperthermia Planning? Dennis Sullivan, Ph.D. Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Idaho Moscow, ID USA 83844-1023

  2. Advantages of FDTD • It is a direct implementation of Maxwell’s • equations (or the bio-heat equation). There is no complicated additional mathematics, e.g., matrix inversion, field singularities, etc. 2. There is no complicated mesh to generate. FDTD uses cubes. • The needed resources increase only linearly • with the size of the problem space, e.g., a problem with 10,000 cells only takes twice as long as a problem with 5,000 cells.

  3. Advantages of FDTD (continued) • It is a time-domain method. The actual radiation or temperature rise can be observed. • Also, signal processing techniques can be brought to bear on simulation problems

  4. Possible Disadvantages of FDTD • The cubic structure can lead to “stair-casing,” 2. The problem space must be truncated properly or reflections will give erroneous fields.

  5. Direct physics-based implementation Electromagnetic radiation is governed by the Maxwell’s equations

  6. Direct physics-based implementation In one dimension in free space they become

  7. Direct physics-based implementation To put these equations in a computer, take the finite-difference approximations of the partial derivatives in time and space ~ = ~ =

  8. Direct physics-based implementation This is a time-domain method. Each new value of the electric field E or the magnetic field H is determined by the previous values

  9. Direct physics-based implementation The k represents the location in an array in a computer while n represents time

  10. Direct physics-based implementation This results in the following two equations of code in the C program language ex[k] = ex[k] + 0.5*( hy[k-1] - hy[k]) hy[k] = hy[k] + 0.5*( ex[k] - ex[k+1])

  11. Direct physics-based implementation n=n+1 Calculate En+1/2 Calculate Hn+1 Each time step represents an increment in the total time T = n Dt.

  12. Direct physics-based implementation The following is a one-dimensional simulation of an EM pulse propagation in free space. {T represents the number of time steps.}

More Related