1 / 10

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Proteolistics : a biolistic method for intracellular delivery of proteins

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Proteolistics : a biolistic method for intracellular delivery of proteins Transgenic Research Susana Martin- Ortigosa a , Kan Wang a , 1

monty
Download Presentation

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Proteolistics : a biolistic method for intracellular delivery of proteins

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Proteolistics: a biolistic method for intracellular delivery of proteins Transgenic Research Susana Martin-Ortigosaa, KanWanga, 1 aCenter for Plant Transformation, Plant Sciences Institute and Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA. 1E-mail kanwang@iastate.edu

  2. Supplementary Figure 1 a 500 mm b Supplementary Fig. 1 aMacrocarrier-set with a liquid suspension of TRITC-BSA protein and 0.6 µm gold (left) and the same macrocarrier-set after lyophilization (right). b“Dotted” distribution of TRITC-BSA/0.6 µm gold suspension on the surface of the macrocarrier-set before lyophilization (left) and after lyophilization (right)

  3. Supplementary Figure 2 a b 100 µm 100 µm Supplementary Fig. 2 Proteolistics delivery using two different sizes of tungsten microprojectiles. Onion epidermis cells showing blue coloration after incubated with X-gluc substrate. Tissues were bombarded with air-dried GUS enzyme/M5 (0.4 µm) aor M17 (1.1 µm) btungsten particle mixture. Per shot, 2 µl of 60 µg/µl solution of tungsten particles were mixed with 4 µl of a 50 µg/µl GUS enzyme solution. Five µl of this mix were placed onto a macrocarrier and air-dried

  4. Supplementary Figure 3 Bright field a b Bright field Red channel Red channel aut Supplementary Fig. 3. Proteolistics delivery of DsRed protein to mice ear pinna tissues. aMicroscope images (5x objective) of mouse ear tissue bombarded with bare 0.6 µm gold projectiles, with no protein coating. In the projectile impact areas red autofluorescence could be observed. This autofluorescence was brighter in the center and then diffused like a halo to the surrounding cells. bMicroscope images (40x objective) of mouse ear pinna tissue after Proteolistic delivery of DsRed protein air-dried onto 0.6 µm gold. Due to red autofluorescence caused by particle physical damage (“aut”) it was difficult to distinguish the red fluorescent protein DsRed delivery. However, some isolated cells (white arrow) showed a distinct isolated red fluorescence that could be due to DsRed protein delivery

  5. Supplementary figure 4 • Supplementary Fig. 4Graph showing mean and standard deviation of the activity of GUS enzyme after different drying treatments. The activity of GUS enzyme was measured following the spectrophotometric assay based on 4-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucuronide (PNPG). The activity of 275 µg of a fresh enzyme solution (Prot), a fresh enzyme solution mixed with 60 µg of 0.6 µm gold microparticles (Prot + Au), a lyophilization (Lyoph.) or air-drying (Air-dry) of the enzyme/gold microparticles was measured at 405 nm. No differences were found in the activities of the different treatments (P= 0.464), concluding that lyophilization or overnight air-drying process do not affect GUS activity under the conditions tested. • Method: Spectrophotometric measurements of GUS activity after lyophilization or air drying methods were done using PNPG following the Massachusetts Institute of Technology protocols available online (http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/biology/7-13-experimental-microbial-genetics-fall-2003/labs/GUS_Assays_v2.pdf) based on previous protocols (K.J. Wilson, S.G. Hughes, R.A. Jefferson, “The Escherichia coli gus operon: induction and expression of the gus operon in E. coli and the occurrence and use of GUS in other bacteria”, in: S.R. Gallagher (Ed.) GUS Protocols: using the GUS gene as a reporter of gene expression, Academic Press Inc.,1992, pp. 7-22.). Briefly, samples of GUS enzyme subjected to different treatments (fresh enzyme solution, mixed with gold microprojectiles, lyophilized for 1 hour or air-dried overnight at room temperature (22C)) were mixed with a solution containing 1.25 mM of PNPG. The mixture was incubated at 37C for 1 hour and then, the reaction was stopped using 0.5 M of sodium carbonate and absorbance was measured using a spectrophotometer at 405 nm. Three repeats per treatment were performed

  6. Supplementary Figure 5 a b 200 µm Supplementary Fig. 5 Delivery of BPB dye lyophilized onto 0.6 µm gold to onion epidermis tissues. aBright field image of an aliquot of bromophenol blue solution on top of onion epidermis tissue. The impermeable dye is not permeating inside the cells. bIntracellular BPB dye delivery to onion epidermis cells after bombardment with 0.6 µm gold coated with the lyophilized dye. Cells show different shades of the purple color depending on the amount of microparticles-dye delivered. Sixty µg of 0.6 µm gold particles (2 µl of a 30 µg/µl suspension) were lyophilized with 10 µl of a 100 µg/µl solution of BPB dye (3',3",5',5"-tetrabromophenolsulfonphthalein, Sigma) 100 µm

  7. Supplementary Figure 6 a d Bright field Green channel c 1mm b e Bright field Green channel Bright field Red channel D 100 µm 250 µm Supplementary Fig. 6 Delivery of DNA dried onto 0.6 µm gold projectiles. aMicroscope images of an onion epidermis tissue showing GFP expression 1 day after bombardment with the plasmid pLMNC95 (Luke Mankin, S. et al. (2001). Plant Mol. Biol. Reporter, 19: 13-26) lyophilized onto 0.6 µm gold projectiles (per shot, 2 µL of a 500 ng/µl plasmid solution and 2 µl of 30 µg/µl projectile suspension). bSimilar results in tobacco leaf tissue. cMaize immature embryo-derived callus showing blue foci after GUS staining assay. The embryos were bombarded with the uidA gene expressing plasmid pACH25 (Christensen, A.H. et al., (1996). Transgenic Res., 5: 213-18) lyophilized onto 0.6 µm gold projectiles (per shot, 3 µL of a 375 ng/µl plasmid solution and 2 µl of 30 µg/µl projectile suspension). GUS assay was done 2 days after the bombardment. dGraph representing the mean and standard deviation of the number of fluorescent cells in 2 repeats of the same experiment (4 repeats per treatment) where onion epidermis tissues were bombarded with 0.6 µm gold (2 µl of 30 µg/µl suspension) and 300 ng of GFP (0.6 µL of a 500 ng/µl solution) expressing plasmid pLMNC95 subjected to the following treatments: standard CaCl2/spermidineDNA coating (“Std-DNA1” and “Std-DNA2” as in Martin-Ortigosa, S. et al. (2012). Small: 8: 413-22); lyophilization (“Lyph-DNA1” and “Lyph-DNA2”); Air-drying (“Air-DNA1” and “Air-DNA2”). For the conditions tested, the CaCl2/spermidine protocol scored the higher number of transiently DNA expressing cells, followed by air-drying, and then, lyophilization protocols. eMicroscope images of onion epidermis cells showing red fluorescence after being bombarded with a linear dsDNA for mCherry expression lyophilized onto 0.6 µm gold microparticles. To obtain mCherry expression linear dsDNA, the plasmid ER-rk (Nelson, B.K. et al. (2007). Plant J., 51: 1126-36) was digested with the restriction enzymes SacI-HindIII. The digestion was electrophoresed in a 0.8% agarose gel and the 1885 bp band was cut and purified using a gel DNA extraction kit (IBI Scientific). For the delivery, 14 µl of a 2.8 ng/µl solution of the purified linear dsDNA were lyophilized with 60 µg of 0.6 µm gold (2 µl of 30 µg/µl suspension) 1mm 1mm

  8. Supplementary Figure 7 a b Supplementary Fig. 7 Proteolistic GUS enzyme delivery to onion epidermis cells. aGraph representing the mean and standard deviation of the number of blue cells found after X-gluc staining in 4 onion epidermis tissue samples bombarded with 5 or 50 µg of GUS enzyme air-dried onto 60 µg of 0.6 µm gold. Only cells that were showing clear blue coloration were counted. No blue cells were observed when 5 µg of protein/bombardment were used. bGraph representing the mean and standard deviation of the number of blue cells obtained in 3 samples of onion epidermis tissue after X-gluc staining and bombardment of GUS enzyme air-dried onto 0.6 µm gold. Two different amounts of protein (50 and 250 µg) and two different final volumes (7 and 20 µl) were tested. As expected, tissues bombarded with 250 µg of the protein showed more blue cells. No conclusions can be obtained in the comparison of the final volume to be dried because due to experimental variability

  9. Supplementary Figure 8 a b Bright field 100 µm Red channel Green channel Supplementary Fig. 8Plant cell viability after protein delivery. aMicroscope images of an onion epidermis cell showing high levels of red fluorescence due to TRITC-BSA protein delivery after bombardment. The same cell shows green fluorescence after fluorescein diacetate vital staining. bGraph representing the mean and standard deviation of the number of dead cells found after fluorescein diacetate staining in onion epidermis tissues (3 repeats per treatment) not bombarded (“Not Bomb.”), bombarded with 0.6 µm gold microcarriers (“0.6 µm”) or bombarded with lyophilized TRITC-BSA/0.6 µm gold mixture (“TRITC-BSA”). The number of dead cells was counted as described in Materials and Methods section – Fluorescein diacetate staining.

  10. Supplementary Table 1 Supplementary Table 1 Characteristics (molecular weight and isoelectric point) of the proteins delivered through Proteolistics described in this work

More Related