1 / 20

Bureau of Land Management U.S. Forest Service Environmental Protection Agency

Implementation of an Interagency MOU to Safeguard Air Quality and Improve Coordination for Federal Oil & Gas NEPA Decisions. Bureau of Land Management U.S. Forest Service Environmental Protection Agency National Park Service Fish & Wildlife Service WESTAR Meeting April 16, 2012.

monita
Download Presentation

Bureau of Land Management U.S. Forest Service Environmental Protection Agency

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Implementation of an Interagency MOU to Safeguard Air Quality and Improve Coordination for Federal Oil & Gas NEPA Decisions Bureau of Land Management U.S. Forest Service Environmental Protection Agency National Park Service Fish & Wildlife Service WESTAR Meeting April 16, 2012 Catherine Collins Branch of Air Quality FWS

  2. Overview • MOU Purpose, Concepts & Goals • MOU Implementation

  3. NEPA Air Quality MOU Basics: Signed on June 23, 2011, by USDA, DOI and EPA officials Five participating agencies EPA BLM FWS NPS FS

  4. Purpose of the MOU • Collaboration: Improve collaboration and respect in conducting analyses of air quality and AQRV impacts and mitigating those impacts; • Certainty: Provide greater certainty and transparency for agencies, project proponents, and the public regarding the conduct and review of air quality and AQRV analyses in the NEPA process, and the application of mitigation; • Regional Perspective:Promote and support a regional perspective on air resources, and collaborative development of appropriate regional air quality assessments; and • Mitigation: Encourage both integration of design features that reduce emissions and application of cost-effective mitigation measures in projects covered by this MOU.

  5. What Does the MOU Mean for Federal Decision Makers & Planners? • Managers’ decision space for Federal oil & gas decisions remains the same under the MOU. • The process Agencies use to gather and disclose information is different. • The new process emphasizes collaboration. • The MOU does not change the roles or responsibilities of states or other partners, or interfere with states’ regulatory authority.

  6. Air Quality and Oil & Gas DevelopmentMOU Premise The agencies: “acknowledge that air resources are important and merit protection within their respective legal authorities. Accordingly, the Agencies will strive to ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, that Federal decisions relating to oil and gas will not cause or contribute to exceedances of the NAAQS, nor adversely impact AQRVs . . .” MOU Section I., page 3

  7. Air Quality and Oil & Gas DevelopmentMOU Premise "recognize that Federal land management agencies must consider multiple resources when authorizing activities, and, therefore, acknowledge that air quality and AQRVs are among the many resources that must be considered in the decision making process." MOU Section I., page 3

  8. MOU Benefits and Desired Outcomes • Early collaboration will ensure all agencies are informed, have opportunity to participate and reduce disagreements and resulting project delays. • Procedures will ensure air quality and AQRV analyses follow a consistent approach • Encourages consistent consideration and protection of air quality and AQRVs

  9. Air Analyses • The MOU outlines steps that all 5 Agencies will use to decide when modeling is appropriate, including: • Reasonably foreseeable number of wells; • Emissions Inventory; and • Application of modeling criteria that consider a plan or project’s emissions/impacts and location.

  10. Specific Procedures: Air Analyses MOU requires air quality modeling when specified criteria are met – criteria include: Emissions/Impacts Geographic location

  11. MOU Mitigation Measures The Lead Agency will identify mitigation in collaboration with Agencies. The Lead Agency will: • determine appropriate mitigation to eliminate or reduce adverse impacts to air quality & AQRVs; • ensure its implementation; • consider a monitoring and enforcement program; and • take appropriate action if mitigation is not effective.

  12. MOU Benefits and Desired Outcomes • Encourages efficiencies through reusable data, reducing cost and analysis completion time. • Provides a resolution process, with specified timelines and hierarchy of decision makers, if a dispute arises. • If the Lead Agency follows the procedures in the MOU, then EPA agrees it will deem the AQ and AQRV analysis as adequate;

  13. Accomplishments since signing the MOU on June 23, 2011 The Joint Agency Implementation Team focused on: • disseminating information about the MOU, • planning implementation, and • developing and providing trainings.

  14. Accomplishments since signing the MOU on June 23, 2011 Briefings and Coordination • Stakeholders were briefed upon signature of the MOU • All agencies have briefed their staff • AQ MOU Basics: What, Why and How • AQ MOU Procedures and Decisions • Questions &Answers Session on the MOU • Technical Training for Air Specialists & NEPA Specialist

  15. Accomplishments since signing the MOU on June 23, 2011 Future Implementation Activities The I-Team will continue to: • provide outreach and resources • look for opportunities to share information about the MOU with interested states and other stakeholders

  16. Take-Away Messages • The MOU’s collaborative approach preserves managers’ decision space for Federal oil & gas decisions, but; • New procedures will be used for the NEPA air quality & AQRVs analyses and mitigation determinations. • The MOU guides Federal Agencies’ working relationships and does not change States’ regulatory authority or NEPA participation. • Focus on increased efficiencies through more effective interagency collaboration & dispute resolution. • The MOU recommends methods to increase efficiencies through reuse of modeling data.

  17. Where can I get the MOU & Additional Information? • DOI Press Release: http://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en/info/newsroom/2011/june/NR_06_27_2011.html • White House: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/08/31/white-house-announces-steps-expedite-high-impact-infrastructure-projects

  18. Agency Web Pages: • NPS: http://www.nature.nps.gov/air/ • FWS: http://www.fws.gov/refuges/AirQuality/index.html • FS: http://www.fs.fed.us/air/ • EPA: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/index.html & http://www.epa.gov/gateway/learn/airpollution.html • BLM: http://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en.html

  19. Who Can Answer Questions? Implementation Team members • FS: Ann Acheson, National Air Program • FS:Jeff Sorkin, Rocky Mountain Regional Office • BLM:Kerry Rodgers, BLM-WO • BLM:Dave Maxwell, NOC • FWS: Catherine Collins, Branch of Air Quality • NPS:Andrea Stacy, Air Resources Division • EPA: Jessica Trice, HQ NEPA Compliance • EPA: Ken Distler, Region 8 The Joint Agency Implementation Plan lists other contacts.

  20. Questions

More Related