primordial non gaussianity from inflation
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Primordial non-Gaussianity from inflation

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 20

Primordial non-Gaussianity from inflation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Christian Byrnes Institute of theoretical physics University of Heidelberg (ICG, University of Portsmouth) David Wands, Kazuya Koyama and Misao Sasaki Diagrams: arXiv:0705.4096, JCAP 0711:027, 2007; Trispectrum: astro-ph/0611075, Phys.Rev.D74:123519, 2006 work in progress.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Primordial non-Gaussianity from inflation' - moe

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
primordial non gaussianity from inflation

Christian Byrnes

Institute of theoretical physics

University of Heidelberg

(ICG, University of Portsmouth)

David Wands, Kazuya Koyama and Misao Sasaki

Diagrams: arXiv:0705.4096,

JCAP 0711:027, 2007;

Trispectrum: astro-ph/0611075, Phys.Rev.D74:123519, 2006

work in progress

Primordial non-Gaussianity from inflation

Kosmologietag, Bielefeld, 8th May 2008

  • Lots of models of inflation, need to predict many observables
  • Non-Gaussianity, observations improving rapidly
  • Not just which parameterises bispectrum
  • ACT, Planck, can observe/constrain trispectrum
  • 2 observable parameters
  • What about higher order statistics?
  • Or loop corrections?
  • Do they modify the predictions?
  • Diagrammatic method
  • Calculates the n-point function of the primordial curvature perturbation, at tree or loop level
  • Separate universe approach
  • Valid for multiple fields and to all orders in slow-roll parameters
the primordial curvature perturbation
The primordial curvature perturbation

Calculate using the formalism (valid on super horizon scales)

Separate universe approach


where and is evaluated at Hubble-exit

Field perturbations are nearly Gaussian at Hubble exit

Curvature perturbation is not Gaussian

Starobinsky `85; Sasaki & Stewart `96; Lyth & Rodriguez ’05

Maldacena ‘01; Seery & Lidsey ‘05; Seery, Lidsey & Sloth ‘06

diagrams from gaussian initial fields
Diagrams from Gaussian initial fields
  • Here for Fourier space, can also give for real space
  • Rule for n-point function, at r-th order, r=n-1 is tree level
  • Draw all distinct connected diagrams with n-external lines (solid) and r propagators (dashed)
  • Assign momenta to all lines
  • Assign the appropriate factor to each vertex and propagator
  • Integrate over undetermined loop momenta
  • Divide by numerical factor (1 for all tree level terms)
  • Add all distinct permutations of the diagrams
explicit example of the rules
Explicit example of the rules

For 3-point function at tree level

After integrating the internal momentum and adding distinct permutations of the external momenta we find

bispectrum and trispectrum
Bispectrum and trispectrum

CB, Sasaki & Wands, 2006; Seery & Lidsey, 2006

observable parameters bispectrum and trispectrum
Observable parameters, bispectrum and trispectrum

We define 3 k independent non-linearity parameters

Note that and both appear at leading order in the trispectrum

The coefficients have a different k dependence,

The non-linearity parameters are

single field inflation
“Single” field inflation
  • Specialise to the case where one field generates the primordial curvature perturbation
  • Includes many of the cases considered in the literature:
  • Standard single field inflation
  • Curvaton scenario
  • Modulated reheating

Only 2 independent parameters

Consistency condition between bispectrum and 1 term of the trispectrum

loop corrections
Loop corrections

The integrals need a cut off

k – observed scale

k max – smoothing scale

L – IR cut off, large scales, L > 1/H

Size of the loop contribution appears to depend on the cut off


Importance of the loop correction?

What is L?

For L~Horizon scale, loop correction to power spectrum is tiny

For L~eternal inflation, loop correction dominates!

Is it just a question of renormalisation?

Little agreement about the IR cut off in the literature

The loop correction has k dependence similar to the tree term, hard to observationally distinguish

The bispectrum can have an observable contribution from the loop correction, even with L=1/H

See recent papers by Lyth, Sloth, Seery, Enqvist et al, etc

Boubekeur and Lyth, ‘05

  • Non-Gaussianity is a topical and powerful way to constrain models of inflation
  • We have presented a diagrammatic approach to calculating n-point function including loop corrections at any order
  • Trispectrum has 2 observable parameters

- only in single field inflation

  • Loop correction poorly understood, appears to grow with cut off
non gaussianity from slow roll inflation
Non-Gaussianity from slow-roll inflation?

single inflaton field

  • can evaluate non-Gaussianity at Hubble exit (zeta is conserved)
  • undetectable with the CMB

multiple field inflation

  • difficult to get large non-Gaussianity during slow-roll inflation

No explicit model has been constructed

Rigopoulos et al 05,Vernizzi & Wands 06

Battefeld & Easther 06, Yokoyama et al 07

Easier to generate non-Gaussianity after inflation

E.g. Curvaton, modulated (p)reheating, inhomogeneous end of inflation

  • There is a way to absorb all diagrams with dressed vertices, this deals with some of the divergent terms
  • A physical interpretation is work in progress
  • We replace derivatives of N evaluated for the background field to the ensemble average at a general point
  • Renormalised vertex = Sum of dressed vertices
  • Remaining loop terms still have a large scale divergence
  • For chaotic inflation starting at the ‘self reproduction’ scale the loops dominate

Boubekeur & Lyth ’05; Seery ’07

and many others…

defining the primordial density perturbation





(3+1) dimensional spacetime


(3+1) dimensional spacetime

gauge-invariant combination: dimensionless density perturbation on spatially flat hypersurfaces

constant on large scales for adiabatic perturbations

Wands, Malik, Lyth & Liddle (2000)

defining the primordial density perturbation

gauge-dependent density perturbation, , and spatial curvature, 



curvaton scenario
Curvaton scenario
  • In the curvaton scenario the primordial curvature perturbation is generated from a scalar field that is light and subdominant during inflation but becomes a significant proportion of the energy density of the universe sometime after inflation.
  • The energy density of the curvaton is a function of the field value at Hubble-exit
  • The ratio of the curvaton’s energy density to the total energy density is
curvaton scenario cont

If the bispectrum will be small

    • In this case the first non-Gaussianity signal might come from the trispectrum through

Enqvist and Nurmi, 2005

Curvaton scenario cont.
  • In the case that r <<1
  • The non-linearity parameters are given by
  • In general this generates a large bispectrum and trispectrum.

Sasaki, Valiviita and Wands 2006

observational constraints
Observational constraints

WMAP3 bound on the bispectrum (but see Jeong and Smoot 07 and Yadav and Wandelt 07)

Hence CMB is at least 99.9% Gaussian!

Bound on the trispectrum?

Not yet but should come this year

Hopefully with WMAP 5 year data

Assuming no detection, Planck is predicted to reach

In the future 21cm data could reach exquisite precision

Kogo and Komatsu ‘06

primordial perturbations from scalar fields
primordial perturbations from scalar fields


in radiation-dominated era curvature perturbation on uniform-density hypersurface

during inflation field perturbations (x,ti) on initial spatially-flat hypersurface


on large scales, neglect spatial gradients, treat as “separate universes”

the  N formalism

Starobinsky `85; Sasaki & Stewart `96

Lyth & Rodriguez ’05 – works to any order


The n-point function of the curvature perturbation

  • This depends on the n-point function of the fields
  • The first term is unobservably small in slow roll inflation
  • Often assume fields are Gaussian, only need 2-point function
  • Not if non-standard kinetic term, break in the potential…
  • Work to leading order in slow roll for convenience, in paper extend to all orders in slow roll
  • Curvature perturbation is non-Gaussian even if the field perturbations are

Maldacena ‘01; Seery & Lidsey ‘05; Seery, Lidsey & Sloth ‘06

  • Inflation generates the primordial density perturbations from vacuum fluctuations in the scalar field
  • The simplest models predict

A nearly scale invariant spectrum of adiabatic (curvature) perturbations with a nearly Gaussian distribution

There are LOTS of models of inflation:

single field, multi field, new, chaotic, hybrid, power-law, natural, supernatural, assisted, Nflation, curvaton, eternal, F-term, D-term, brane, DBI, k- ....

With so many models we need as many observables as possible to distinguish between them

Not just the spectral index and tensor-scalar ratio