1 / 10

EFR and development

EFR and development. EFR is an economic instrument . By internalising environmental costs it helps sustainable development and, pollution reduction As a result of fiscally neutral EFR The economy will gain through greater resource use efficiency and the growth of green industries

mmcfarland
Download Presentation

EFR and development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EFR and development • EFR is an economic instrument. By internalising environmental costs it helps • sustainable development and, • pollution reduction • As a result of fiscally neutral EFR • The economy will gain through greater resource use efficiency and the growth of green industries • Employment will grow because of lower labour taxation as well as new (green) industries

  2. COMPETITIVENESS (1) • EFR leads to increased competitiveness for the reasons outlined in the previous slide • Ecotaxes may lead to some product and process substitution (usually within the same industry) • Only negative short-term impact is on heavy energy-users • I.e. fossil fuel electricity, cement and steel-making. The energy market liberalisation has led to falling prices; cement industry is switching to alternative fuels and steel industry is already supported

  3. COMPETITIVENESS (2) • FISCAL NEUTRALITY = lower labour taxes • Ecotaxes are recycled towards reduced labour taxes • EU countries with the most advanced EFRs (S, DK, NL, DE) have respected this principle, facilitating acceptability of the reform and boosting employment

  4. COMPETITIVENESS (3) • DOUBLE DIVIDEND • According to research 84% of all EU taxes are levied on human effort and only 8% are ecotaxes. The proposed 10% shift from the first to the second category will • reduce resource waste and pollution and, • reduce labour costs in the overwhelming majority of European business (services) (in Germany we had 1,9% reduction of social insurance contributions in the first phase only)

  5. CONDITIONS FOR SMOOTH TRANSITION • Gradual introduction over 8 years • Mitigating measures for EFR impact on competitiveness • Transitional tax rebates for few industries against firm commitment to cut energy use and pollution • Regional aid and restructuring programmes • European harmonisation and • (if possible) International co-ordination

  6. INCOME DISTRIBUTION • Measures to address potential social impacts created by the regressive effect of some indirect ecotaxes (especially on energy) • Changes in income tax brackets to compensate this (forexample regular “fine-tuning” of income distribution in NL) • Social contribution cuts concentrated on lower salaries and wages • A fair split of social contributions cuts between employers and employees. E.g. a 50/50 formula

  7. INCOME DISTRIBUTION (2) • We call for an EFR comprising compensating social measures, such asincreases of some social benefits, tax exemptions, tax credits, or rebates for lower income brackets • which must be designed in a way that they maintain a strong incentive for energy saving and efficiency • The abolition of environmentally harmful subsidies may finance economic and social transition programmes

  8. EFR and employment • EFR has net positive effects on employment due to the decrease of labour taxes and the push for innovation (new green jobs) • Germany: potential for 250 000 new jobs with EFR (DIW study) • Denmark: 28 000 new jobs thanks to the “greening” of the economy (C. Ege) • EC Report brings green jobs to 1 500 000 with 30 000 new jobs created for every €1 bn invested, boosting household income

  9. Conclusions • EFR experiences in Europe have been good first steps, but too timid, with many exemptions, and no EU minimum harmonisation • Significant tax shifts and a good design are indispensable for an appreciable impact on the environment and employment • we call for an important tax shift (10% in total tax revenue) to deliver the double dividend

  10. Conclusions (continued) • The EU is suffering from pollution, overuse of natural resources and unemployment • at the same time it is a leader in the environmental effort, and must honour its Kyoto commitments • EFR is the right instrument please join our campaign! { { {

More Related