Organization delivery of tertiary systems at the district level
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 32

Organization & Delivery of Tertiary Systems at the District Level PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 56 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Organization & Delivery of Tertiary Systems at the District Level. Cynthia M. Anderson & Kimberli Breen University of Oregon & Illinois PBIS. Challenge for Schools. Produce students who are academically and socially competent But, must meet these outcomes in the face of…

Download Presentation

Organization & Delivery of Tertiary Systems at the District Level

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Organization delivery of tertiary systems at the district level

Organization & Delivery of Tertiary Systems at the District Level

Cynthia M. Anderson & Kimberli Breen

University of Oregon & Illinois PBIS


Challenge for schools

Challenge for Schools

Produce students who are academically and socially competent

But, must meet these outcomes in the face of…

  • Students from increasingly varied backgrounds

  • Decreasing funding


Problems at schools

Problems at Schools

  • Struggling readers

  • Can’t read at all

  • Letter/word reversal

  • Comprehension difficulties

  • Memorization difficulties

  • Retention problems

  • English language learners

  • Lack of number recognition

  • Math fact deficits

  • Homework completion

  • Sloppy work

  • Test anxiety

  • Oral reading fluency

  • Poor writing skills

  • Fights

  • Property destruction

  • Weapons violation

  • Violence toward teachers

  • Tobacco use

  • Drug use

  • Alcohol use

  • Insubordination

  • Noncompliance

  • Late to class

  • Truancy

  • Inappropriate language

  • Harassment

  • Trespassing

  • Vandalism

  • Verbal abuse

and on and on

and on and on and on and on and on


Swpbs universal level

SWPBS: Universal Level

Supporting

Staff Behavior

Supporting

Decision Making

OUTCOMES

Systems

Outcomes

Practices

Supporting Student Behavior


Organization delivery of tertiary systems at the district level

School-Wide

Positive Behavior

Support

Intensive Interventions

Specialized

Individualized

Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior

~5%

Targeted Interventions

Specialized Group

Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior

Universal Interventions

School-/Classroom-

Wide Systems for

All Students,

Staff, & Settings

~15%

~80% of Students


Organization delivery of tertiary systems at the district level

Supporting

Staff Behavior

Supporting

Decision Making

OUTCOMES

Systems

Outcomes

Practices

Supporting Student Behavior


Practices

Practices

  • Continuum of supports


Organization delivery of tertiary systems at the district level

Tier 1/Universal

School-Wide Assessment

School-Wide Prevention Systems

Assessment

Intervention

Tier 2/Secondary

Tier 3/

Tertiary

Small Group Interventions(CICO, etc)

Attendance, RFA, ODR, GPA, etc.

Group Interventions with

Individualized components

CICO data, data from other targeted groups

Function-based intervention

Functional Behavior Assessment

Adapted from T. Scott, 2004


Practices1

Practices

  • Continuum of supports

  • Documentation for targeted and intensive interventions

    • What intervention consists of

    • Materials needed

    • Data-based decision rules

    • Plan for progress monitoring

  • Interventions for academic and social behavior linked

BSP Features

CICO Features


School wide systems for student success a response to intervention rti model

School-Wide Systems for Student Success:A Response to Intervention (RtI) Model

Academic Systems

Behavioral Systems

  • Tier 3/Tertiary Interventions 1-5%

  • Individual students

  • Assessment-based

  • High intensity

  • 1-5%Tier 3/Tertiary Interventions

    • Individual students

    • Assessment-based

    • Intense, durable procedures

  • 5-15%Tier 2/Secondary Interventions

    • Some students (at-risk)

    • High efficiency

    • Rapid response

    • Small group interventions

    • Some individualizing

  • Tier 2/Secondary Interventions 5-15%

  • Some students (at-risk)

  • High efficiency

  • Rapid response

  • Small group interventions

  • Some individualizing

  • Tier 1/Universal Interventions 80-90%

  • All students

  • Preventive, proactive

  • 80-90%Tier 1/Universal Interventions

    • All settings, all students

    • Preventive, proactive

Illinois PBIS Network, Revised May 15, 2008. Adapted from “What is school-wide PBS?” OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. Accessed at http://pbis.org/schoolwide.htm


Practices2

Practices

  • Continuum of supports

  • Interventions for academic and social behavior linked

  • Multiple ways of identifying students who may benefit

    • Office discipline referrals

    • Request for assistance

    • Formative evaluations

Sample Formative Evaluation


Organization delivery of tertiary systems at the district level

Supporting

Staff Behavior

Supporting

Decision Making

OUTCOMES

Systems

Outcomes

Practices

Supporting Student Behavior


Systems

Systems

  • Teams to support all students

    • SWPBS/leadership team

      • Guide implementation of universal intervention

      • Monitor outcomes and process (fidelity)

      • Braid incoming initiatives into SWPBS

      • Communicate with school community about SWPBS

    • Teams to

      • Build systems and interventions for secondary tertiary

      • Progress monitor

      • Conduct FBA & wraparound and build interventions


Example ipbs systems

Example: IPBS Systems

Goal: Build systems and interventions for secondary tertiary

  • Initial “new teams training” & admin training

    • Focus on systems and progress monitoring

  • Monthly district team meetings

    • Support plan coaching

    • Systems for Tier II interventions

      • What skills/materials are needed?

      • What are target behaviors?

      • What is the goal?

      • What defines progress and lack of progress?

CICO Features


Example ipbs systems1

Example: IPBS Systems

  • Teams to support all students

    • SWPBS/leadership team

    • IPBS Team

      • Responsibilities

      • Membership

        • Coordinator

        • Administrator

        • FBA coordinator

        • Targeted interventions coordinator

        • Academic specialist

        • Representation from Regular and Special ed.

Minutes


Example ipbs systems2

Example: IPBS Systems

  • Teams to support all students

    • SWPBS/leadership team

    • IPBS team

    • Student-focused team

      • Responsibilities

        • Conduct functional behavior assessment

        • Build support plan

      • Membership

        • Someone with expertise in function-based support

        • Teacher(s), other stakeholders

        • Parent, student


Example illinois pbis

Example: Illinois PBIS

  • Tertiary Systems Planning Team

  • Secondary Systems Planning Team

  • Secondary (Generic) Problem Solving Team

  • Individual Youth FBA/BIP Team

  • Wraparound Team

  • District Tertiary Leadership Team


Example illinois pbis s tertiary planning team

Example: Illinois PBIS’s Tertiary Planning Team

  • Administrator

  • Social worker/guidance/school psychologist

  • General Educator

  • Special Educator

  • Tertiary Coach


Example illinois pbis s tertiary system planning team

Example: Illinois PBIS’s Tertiary System Planning Team

  • Building-based team

    • Supported by Tertiary Coach

    • Review/assess all levels of intervention

      • Data, referrals, team perspectives

    • Focus on effectiveness of Tertiary interventions (data, not individual students)

    • Pull interventions down to Universal & Secondary levels (efficiency)

    • Strengthen Tertiary interventions with Universal & Secondary (effectiveness)

    • Support wraparound facilitators


Example illinois pbis student specific teams

Example: Illinois PBIS’ Student-Specific Teams

  • Wraparound Team:

    • Family of child and all relevant stakeholders invited by family. Wrap facilitators are trained to effectively engage families so that they will see that these teams are created by and for the family, and therefore will want to have a team and actively participate. School staff involved are informed that their presence is uniquely important for this youth and invited to participate.

  • Individual Youth FBA/BIP Team:

    • Like the wraparound team, this team is uniquely created for each individual child in need of comprehensive planning and the families are critical members of the team (esp. since planning is done based on multiple-life domains). All relevant individuals/staff are invited.


Systems1

Systems

  • Teams to support all students

  • System for monitoring outcomes

  • Access to assistance

    • Assistance for teachers

    • Assistance for team members

  • Link across continuum of PBS (universal, targeted, intensive)

  • School-family connection


Organization delivery of tertiary systems at the district level

Supporting

Staff Behavior

Supporting

Decision Making

OUTCOMES

Systems

Outcomes

Practices

Supporting Student Behavior


Outcomes data

Outcomes/Data

  • Individual students

    • Tools for data collection

    • Tools for easy graphing and evaluation

    • Teachers receive feedback regularly

    • Parents receive feedback regularly

  • Effects of system monitored

    • Outcomes

    • Fidelity

    • Social validity

Daily

Fidelity


Organization delivery of tertiary systems at the district level

  • Our Goal: Supporting students with significant challenges

    • With positive outcomes

    • With fidelity

    • Over time

District

Support


Challenges for districts

Challenges for Districts

  • Universal level of PBS available for ALL students

  • Moving from one-student at a time, reactive approaches to capacity within schools to support the behavior of ALL students?

  • Developing and implementing systems needed for tertiary implementation

  • Referrals to Special Education seen as the “intervention”

  • FBA viewed as required “paperwork” vs. a needed part of designing an intervention

  • Interventions the system is familiar with vs. ones likely to produce an effect


Districts support school practices

Districts Support School Practices

  • Practices to be supported

    • Targeted interventions

    • Function-based support

    • Data-based decision rules

  • District support

    • Investment in 2-4 targeted interventions

    • Initial and on-going training for relevant personnel

      • Build capacity in efficient FBA

      • Technical assistance available for comprehensive FBA/BSP

      • On-site coaching for new IPBS schools

    • Hiring practices promote implementation of evidence-based interventions


Districts support school systems

Districts Support School Systems

  • District teams support school teams

    • District leadership team

    • District IPBS team

  • SWPBS a priority for district

  • Funding available for school SWPBS efforts


Districts support school use of data

Districts Support School Use of Data

  • District provides schools data system—all tiers

  • District uses data to guide decision-making

    • Training needs

    • Support needs

  • District highlights important outcomes for stakeholders


Ipbs timeline

IPBS Timeline


Organization delivery of tertiary systems at the district level

So…..

What are the Outcomes?


Summary

Summary…

  • Multi-tiered, comprehensive supports needed to meet needs of students in schools

  • Effective and sustained implementation requires clearly articulated

    • Interventions with empirical support

    • Systems to support implementation

    • Strategies to use data to guide decision-making

District Support

and

Active Involvement


Organization delivery of tertiary systems at the district level

Questions about Illinois PBIS Questions about IPBS?

Kim Breen Cynthia Anderson: [email protected]


  • Login