6 12b belilo spate irrigation system l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 12

6.12b Belilo Spate Irrigation System PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 57 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

6.12b Belilo Spate Irrigation System. Discussion Case on Sedimentation. History. Earlier only perennial irrigation – dried up Weir crest increased – now spate irrigation Serves 500 ha = approximately 750 families Sedimentation problems. Sedimentation problems. Headworks. Intake

Download Presentation

6.12b Belilo Spate Irrigation System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


6 12b belilo spate irrigation system l.jpg

6.12bBelilo Spate Irrigation System

Discussion Case on Sedimentation


History l.jpg

History

  • Earlier only perennial irrigation – dried up

  • Weir crest increased – now spate irrigation

  • Serves 500 ha = approximately 750 families

  • Sedimentation problems


Sedimentation problems l.jpg

Sedimentation problems


Headworks l.jpg

Headworks

Intake

on the right


Headworks5 l.jpg

Headworks

Intake

on the right


Intake channel l.jpg

Intake channel

Intake with

stoplog

Some

sediment

Washing in

from the

sides

No

undersluice

Intake channel

filled with sediment


Gate including stoplog at the intake l.jpg

Gate – including stoplog - at the intake


Fine sediment in the river l.jpg

Fine sediment in the river

Stilling basin

filled with sediment


View immediately upstream of the weir l.jpg

View immediately upstream of the weir

Main river course

Side flow


Analysis l.jpg

Analysis

  • The intake may be located on the inside of a shallow bend- not recommended as this will enhance the sediment loads diverted to the canal. The weir crest is still above the river bed, so presumably diversion of low flows is possible. However depending on the river slope the upstream bed level can be expected to rise, and if (when) this occurs the intake location will make diversion of low flows more difficult.

  • The intake is aligned at 90 degrees to the river channel, this will enhance the coarse sediment load diverted to the canal and a far shallower angle is preferred. (I.E. the existing intake is probably not optimally designed )


Solution l.jpg

Solution?

Undersluice on intake

channel before the gate

Conical abuttment (as in Yemen)

and soil bund guiding flow to

intake channel – increasing slope

and providing safety valve


Expert opinion l.jpg

Expert opinion

  • 1) Assume you are moving the intake upstream to gain command, enabling the canal slope to be increased? If so then a more favourable location at the outside of river bend may be possible.

  • 2) Increasing the canal slope, particularly of the lined section, will reduce the quantities of sediment settling in the head reach, but of course slopes have to be increased through the system if the coarser sediments are to moved down to fields, ( where they are probably not wanted by farmers.) If exclusion cannot be improved then regular de silting at a milder slope section away from the intake could be considered?

  • 3) You are advocating replacing the fixed weir with a soil bund. If the objective is to reduce sedimentation then the bund should wash out at high river flows. Are farmers prepared to replace the bund, perhaps several times a year? In this case an under sluice will provide little benefit as the bund will fail when the high river flows occur, and this is the only times when an under sluice would be operated.

  • 4) If on the other hand you intend to bund to fail only when very large (historical) floods occur then a properly designed under sluice “fixed” to a hard point (the conical pier) could proved some benefits, (if operated) but it would be essential to limit flows entering the canal with an orifice/rejection spillway to prevent excessive flows being diverted.


  • Login