1 / 16

World Bank Climate Investment Funds

World Bank Climate Investment Funds. Report of PPCR Expert Group on Country Selection Process. 27 January 2009. Context. Remit Identify 5-10 countries or groups or countries for participation in PPCR Address a number of criteria: vulnerability eligibility

misae
Download Presentation

World Bank Climate Investment Funds

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. World Bank Climate Investment Funds Report of PPCR Expert Group on Country Selection Process 27 January 2009

  2. Context • Remit • Identify 5-10 countries or groups or countries for participation in PPCR • Address a number of criteria: • vulnerability • eligibility • country preparedness & rapid results • country distribution (regional) • Hazard types • Coherence & value addition • Replicability & sustainability • Scalability & development impact

  3. Addressing criteria in ToR • Criteria • Hazard (V), vulnerability (I) & preparedness (III) addressed explicitly • Country distribution (IV) addressed through choice of regions • Eligibility (II) considered - countries not selected if ineligible • Replicability & sustainability (VII) related to regional contexts • Scalability & development impact (VIII) function of development & hazard contexts • Coherence & value addition (VI) depends on specific national contexts • To a significant extent, VI, VII & VIII will depend on nature of programmes & projects supported, & how they are implemented - cannot pre-judge

  4. How to approach the problem? • Practical considerations • Short timescale • How to bring some coherence & transparency to process? • What data to use? • How to deploy data? Problems with indicator-driven approaches… • How to address criteria? • How to ensure selection relevant to climate change?

  5. The EG’s approach • Risk assessment approach • Address climate change risks faced by countries • Risk arises from interaction of hazards with underlying vulnerability • Hazard as an entry point for analysis • STEP 1 • Identify long-term, large-scale climate changehazards • Select climate change “hot-spots” where these hazards are high • STEP 2 • Identify which countries are most vulnerable to hazard(s) in question • Use indicators relevant to region, hazard & development context

  6. Hazards are not just about extremes and variability

  7. Climate change “hot-spots” in Africa • North Africa / Maghreb • Extreme desiccation - risks to water availability, agriculture, rangelands, food security • Southern Africa • Desiccation coupled with risk of landscape/ecosystem collapse in greater Kalahari region & ENSO impacts • Risks to livelihoods, food security, water resources • Sahel • Highly uncertain, increased rainfall variability, possibility of wetter conditions but not necessarily sustained • How to deal with decadal-scale variability & longer? Risks of maladaptation Annual temperature & precipitation changes over Africa between 1980-1999 & 2080-2099 from MMD-A1B simulations, men for 21 models. Source: IPCC (2007)

  8. Indicators for vulnerability screening in North Africa / Maghreb • LECZ - population in low-elevation coastal zone • CRDIa - total no. affected by climate-related disasters 1978-2007, scaled by 2007 popn. • IWS - % of population with access to improved water source • FI - food insecurity inferred from % of population undernourished • HDI - human development index rank, proxy for adaptive capacity • CVI - climate vulnerability index (emphasising water) • CDVI - number of occurrences in top fifth of vulnerability index with 13 different weights • CDRIb - historical climate disaster risk on scale 1-5 based across related indices for 1990s • RAI - Resource allocation index, proxy for country preparedness

  9. Other “hot-spot” regions identified South Asia:Exposed to changes in water availability resulting from loss of Himalayan glaciers. Loss of water outside monsoon season, also extremes, SLR. Southeast Asia: High exposure to sea-level rise and associated coastal climate change hazards due to low-lying land, megadeltas, high population. Central Asia:Exposed to desiccation as a result of high temperature increases, significant reductions in rainfall & loss of snow-melt from mountain regions. Andean region: Exposed to severe reductions in water availability due to glacier loss, also other hazards linked to ENSO, circulation changes. Caribbean: High exposure to a suite of hazards associated with sea-level rise, possible changes in tropical storms, ecosystem loss, desiccation & water loss. Pacific Islands: Similar to Caribbean region, with additional problems of isolation & fact that many islands are low-lying atolls. + North Africa/Magreb, Southern Africa & Sahel (previous slide) = 9 regions Based on projections from IPCC AR4 (2007), expert judgment & review of other, post-AR4 literature.

  10. Countries & regional groups selected Caribbean region (Dominica, Guyana, Haiti) Pacific region (countries TBC) Cambodia, Vietnam, Philippines (Southeast Asia)

  11. Country distribution

  12. Comments on countries selected • Global distribution - regional balance • Diverse environments & development contexts • A range of key long-term hazards also linked with extreme events • Identification of additional high-risk African LDCs

  13. Strengths of the EG’s approach • Coherent methodology & conceptual framework • Transparent process • Combines expert judgment with indicator-based data • Not reductionist - not based on single-number index • Addresses contextual nature of risk (to an extent) • Is climate change specific (except for preparedness indicator & HDI)

  14. Caveats • Top-down approach • Characterisation of hazard & vulnerability necessarily crude • Based on projections that may be conservative - may miss certain hazards and/or underestimate their severity • Focuses on large-scale, long-term, systemic hazards & risks - countries may experience high risks due to other combinations of hazard & vulnerability, e.g. combinations of extremes etc.

  15. Alternatives & improvements • More participatory selection process might be desirable • has its own risks - easy to lose climate change focus • Method could be refined by developing better indicators • Hazard index addressing different national context • Vulnerability indicators targeting national hazard & development contexts • Risk indices combining hazard & vulnerability • Time & resource intensive undertaking, but might start with one region

  16. End of presentation

More Related