1 / 26

C.A. Dominguez Centre for Theoretical Physics & Astrophysics University of Cape Town

GELL-MANN-OAKES-RENNER RELATION IN QCD: CHIRAL CORRECTIONS FROM SUM RULES. C.A. Dominguez Centre for Theoretical Physics & Astrophysics University of Cape Town Department of Physics, Stellenbosch University South Africa Work done with J. Bordes, P. Moodley, J. Pe ñarrocha, K. Schilcher.

misae
Download Presentation

C.A. Dominguez Centre for Theoretical Physics & Astrophysics University of Cape Town

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. GELL-MANN-OAKES-RENNER RELATION IN QCD: CHIRAL CORRECTIONS FROM SUM RULES C.A. Dominguez Centre for Theoretical Physics & Astrophysics University of Cape Town Department of Physics, Stellenbosch University South Africa Work done with J. Bordes, P. Moodley, J. Peñarrocha, K. Schilcher QCD- 2010 Montpellier

  2. GMOR RELATION:A QCD LOW ENERGY THEOREM (NLO)

  3. GMOR RELATION:A QCD LOW ENERGY THEOREM (NLO)

  4. IMPORTANCE OF δπ • 1) INTRINSIC • 2) χPT: δπ= (4 Mπ2 / fπ2) ( 2 Lr8 – Hr2) • 3) Lattice QCD: Lr8

  5. SUBTLETIES • RENORMALIZATION • LOG [QUARK MASS] SINGULARITIES • NORMAL ORDERING • HIGHER ORDER QUARK MASS CORRECTIONS Broadhurst & Generalis (81-82) Jamin & Münz (95) Chetyrkin, Dominguez, Pirjol, Schilcher (95) Dominguez, Nasrallah, Schilcher (08)

  6. IS δπ = 0 ??? • QCD CORRECTIONS: • HADRONIC CORRECTIONS: ∂µ Aµ (x) = 2 fπ2 Mπ2φπ(x) + Σn 2 fn2 Mn2φn(x)

  7. QCD SUM RULESShifman-Vainshtein-Zakharov

  8. QUARK-HADRON DUALITY

  9. QCD FINITE ENERGY SUM RULE Δ5(s): ANALYTIC KERNEL

  10. PQCD

  11. HADRONIC ψ5(s)

  12. Realistic Spectral Function Im G E2

  13. PION RADIAL EXCITATIONS • π (1300): M = 1300 ± 100 MeV • Γ = 200 – 600 MeV • π (1800): M = 1812 ±14 MeV • Γ = 207 ± 13 MeV

  14. PROBLEM • Hadronic pseudoscalar spectral function: • NOT DIRECTLY MEASURABLE • Knowledge of mass & width of resonances: • NOT ENOUGH TO RECONSTRUCT SPECTRAL FUNCTION INELASTICITY, NON-RESONANT BACKGROUND, INTERFERENCE: ??? SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY

  15. QCD FINITE ENERGY SUM RULE Δ5(s): ANALYTIC KERNEL

  16. Δ5 (s) • Δ5 (s) = 1 - a0 s – a1 s2 • Δ5 (M12) = Δ5 (M22) = 0

  17. Realistic Spectral FunctionIMPACT OF KERNEL Δ5(s) Im G E2

  18. Δ5 (s) • Δ5 (s) ≡ Pn(s) ⇨ Legendre Polynomials • (with global constraints) • TUNED TO STRONGLY QUENCH THE HADRONIC RESONANCE CONTRIBUTION TO THE FESR

  19. FOPTαs(s0) & mq(s0) frozen. RG ⇨ after integrationCIPTαs(s0) & mq(s0) running. RG ⇨ before integration(µ2 = s)FIXED µ2 = 2 – 50 GeV2

  20. INPUT • αS (M2) = 0.344  0.0009(Davier et al., 2008) = 0.342  0.0012(Pich, 2010) • (mu + md) / 2 = 4.1  0.2 MeV (Dominguez et al., 2009) = 3.9  0.5 MeV (Lattice ETMC, 2008) . O (m4) ; <αs G2> : NEGLIGIBLE . IMPACT OF π1(1300) & π2(1800): < 6 % • (On account of Δ5(s))

  21. δπ(%) δπ= 6.2  1.6 %

  22. Lr8 (νχ=Mρ) = (0.88  0.24)  10-3Jamin (CHPT) 2002 • From a determination of <s-bar s> / <u-bar u>using same Δ5(s) ** From a determination of <s-bar s> / <u-bar u>

  23. EARLIER DETERMINATIONS OF δπ • PQCD: only to two or three loop order • PQCD: different values of αs • HADRONIC: strongly model dependent spectral functions [Δ5(s) = 1]

More Related