1 / 27

Carbon dynamics: perspectives from ecosystem models

Carbon dynamics: perspectives from ecosystem models. Sarah C. Davis Interface Meeting, Captiva Island Fl March 2, 2011. Major challenges. Long-term responses to climate change Effects of land use change. Outline. Approach to modeling Carbon trends in perennial grass crops

minh
Download Presentation

Carbon dynamics: perspectives from ecosystem models

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Carbon dynamics: perspectives from ecosystem models Sarah C. Davis Interface Meeting, Captiva Island Fl March 2, 2011

  2. Major challenges • Long-term responses to climate change • Effects of land use change

  3. Outline • Approach to modeling • Carbon trends in perennial grass crops – belowground carbon sequestration • Land use issues and challenges • Carbon dynamics in forested ecosystems • aboveground carbon sequestration • Resolving long term responses of forests to climate change

  4. Ecosystem modeling approach • Comparative ecosystem physiology • Comparative ecosystem biogeochemistry • Coupled to hypothesis-driven research

  5. Net photosynthesis Leaf nitrogen content Example of a physiology-driven model (PnET) Realized gross photosynthesis Maximum gross photosynthesis GPP VPD PAR daylength Radiation Day temperature Night temperature Basal respiration Realized respiration NPP

  6. Example of biogeochemistry- driven model Miscanthus x giganteus Parton et al. 1998

  7. Above- vs. Below-ground Carbon Sinks • “Judicious management” can increase soil C • Lugo et al., 1986, Cerri et al. 1991, Izaurralde et al. 2000, Conant et al. 2001, Zan et al. 2001, Lal 2004 • Long-term carbon sequestration more dependent on increasing aboveground biomass • Schlesinger 1990, Richter et al. 1999, Schlesinger and Lichter 2001

  8. EcosystemModels Tools for characterizing effects of both climate change and land use change Ecosystem productivity Atmospheric CO2 Biomass Harvest Ecosystem productivity Atmospheric CO2

  9. Miscanthus and Switchgrass Davis , Parton et al. 2011 in press

  10. Net Greenhouse Gas Fluxes Corn Miscanthus Switchgrass no fertilizer Switchgrass fertilizer Davis , Parton et al. 2011 in press

  11. Soil Carbon Corn Miscanthus Switchgrass no fertilizer Switchgrass fertilizer Davis , Parton et al. 2011 in press

  12. Land Use Change • A controversial issue for biofuels • Scaling beyond the case study is very difficult • Political forces are sometimes inhibitory • We need internationally standardized land use monitoring and databases • See Davis et al. 2011 in Journal of the Royal Society Interface

  13. Eastern US Forest Carbon Sink • Regenerating forests • Caspersen et al. 2000, Schimel et al. 2000, McGuire et al. 2001, Hurtt et al. 2002, Goodale et al. 2002, Houghton 2003, Nabuurs et al. 2003 • Climate change • Schimel 1995, Cao & Woodward 1998, Kicklighter et al. 1999, Joos et al. 2001, Joos et al. 2002, McGuire et al. 2001

  14. Loblolly Pine Production

  15. Pine Plantation Harvests

  16. How do forested respond to climate change over time?

  17. Loblolly pine production over time Drake, Davis, Raetz, DeLucia 2010 Global Change Biology

  18. Photosynthetic Response to CO2 Ca = 12CO2 + 13CO2 Ci Ci :Ca is proportional to photosynthesis (A) Lower Ci:Ca means more 13C is assimilated

  19. Do young and old forests respond similarly to climate change?

  20. Old forests have experienced the changing atmospheric CO2 concentration Is the gradual response to CO2 over a century similar to the instantaneous response?

  21. Historical response vs. Projected Response

  22. Physiological Constraints on Response to CO2 vary over time

  23. Summary • Soil carbon sequestration is greater in perennial crops than row crops. • There is a need for internationally standardized land use data. • Older forests may be more responsive to increases in atmospheric CO2than younger forests.

  24. Acknowledgements • Steve Del Grosso • Evan DeLucia • John Drake • Cindy Keough • Ernest Marx • Tim Mies • Steve Long • Bill Parton • Lisa Raetz

More Related