Implementing the Water Asset Accounts (WAA) over the EEA area. Lessons learnt from “broad-brush” and “refined” implementation. Key challenges for data collection Philippe Crouzet EEA. The EEA.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Implementing the Water Asset Accounts (WAA) over the EEA area
Lessons learnt from “broad-brush” and “refined” implementation. Key challenges for data collection
The EEA area of intervention
EEA member countries
European Neighbourhood Policy
Strategy for a new partnership for Central Asia
Are time 1 and 2 consistent vs. stock assessment?
Do gains compensate for losses? Can gain substitute to losses?
Has the quality of the stock been maintained?
Gain in stock
e.g. by storage
Data Time unit
Data content issue
Loss of stock
e.g. by usage
Catchment statistical unit
The high differences between reaches demonstrates the need for considering river segment as SU
Essential: cannot be modelled
Replaceable: can be modelled from other variable
Define accurately statistical units
These three data sets are built from totally independent sources
Urgent progresses to make under SEIS,
Thank you for your attention
The problem with this source is that it presents only an area where irrigation could be done per cell (5’*5’). This gives a certain potential, to model with crops
Assumptions to be carried out in the accounting computation.
For refined computation, in the absence of other source, apportionment of JRC source (as volume per 10*10km cell) was used after apportioning per sub-basin, which is the smaller aggregation level (sub-basins are apportionment of RBDs).
Secondary assumption were made to share surface /GW and seasonalise.