1 / 15

Lakes - Central GIG progress report July 2004

Lakes - Central GIG progress report July 2004. Presented by Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland and Marine Waters Unit. 12 countries. Belgium Czech Republic Denmark Estonia France Germany Hungary Latvia Lithuania Netherlands Poland

minak
Download Presentation

Lakes - Central GIG progress report July 2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Lakes - Central GIG progress reportJuly 2004 Presented bySandra PoikaneJoint Research CentreInstitute for Environment and SustainabilityInland and Marine Waters Unit

  2. 12 countries • Belgium • Czech Republic • Denmark • Estonia • France • Germany • Hungary • Latvia • Lithuania • Netherlands • Poland • Slovakia • United Kingdom

  3. Central GIG - Lakes • <

  4. Common IC types • Lowland, very shallow, calcareous, • Lowland, shallow, stratified, calcareous • Lowland,shallow , siliceous, vegetation dominated by Lobelia

  5. Discussion on Intercalibration parameters • Chlorophyll a • Phytoplankton – species composition • Macrophyte vegetation - species composition, abundance

  6. Chlorophyll a - relatively easy ! • What kind of chlorophyll data to ask? - average value of vegetation season - maximum value of late summer • How to aggregate data ? The mean value would be the most appropriate

  7. Chlorophyll a - relatively easy ! • What time period to choose ? The vegetation period (described as April – October or 2 weeks after ice – break) • Sampling method ? to report the sampling methods, preferably surface sample • Analyses methods ? to report the extraction methods, anyway data should be comparable between different methods • How many years ? if possible, average and maximum values for the last 5 years

  8. Phytoplankton species composition Which parameter ? • Abundance (cells/l) • Biomass (mg/l) • Biomass (% of the total biomass) • Numerical scale for dominant species

  9. Phytoplankton species composition • to ask for 5 dominant taxa (even in case, if there are no pronounced dominants) • to choose late summer dominant species • dominance based on biovolume or considering the typical cell volume • to provide numerical scale for dominant species (see table) • species or genus level

  10. Macrophyte vegetation

  11. Macrophyte vegetation • 5 dominant taxa and maximal colonized water depth and the covered area (in % of lake ?) • use of ECOFRAME classification of abundance (5 levels) • only submerged plants • genus or species level • based on cover of littoral of deep lakes (3 – 15 m) or whole lakes for very shallow lakes (< 3 m)

  12. Common metrics for macrophyte vegetation ? 3 possibilities for a common metric: • submerged covered area • a list of indicator species which are present in reference conditions • deep lakes (>3 m): maximum colonised water depth

  13. Overview

  14. Data template for chlorophyll, P, Secchi,supporting data, pressure data

  15. Thank you for attention ! Deep hard light lakes(3-15 m, > 165 µS/cm, < 150 mgPt/l)

More Related