Investigation of contacts of persons with infectious tuberculosis 2005
Download
1 / 53

Investigation of Contacts of Persons with Infectious Tuberculosis, 2005 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 93 Views
  • Uploaded on

Investigation of Contacts of Persons with Infectious Tuberculosis, 2005. National Tuberculosis Controllers Association Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Division of Tuberculosis Elimination Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 5.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Investigation of Contacts of Persons with Infectious Tuberculosis, 2005' - mina


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Investigation of contacts of persons with infectious tuberculosis 2005

Investigation of Contacts of Persons with Infectious Tuberculosis, 2005

National Tuberculosis Controllers Association

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Division of Tuberculosis Elimination

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Investigation of contacts of persons with infectious tuberculosis 20051

5 Tuberculosis, 2005

Investigation of Contacts of Persons with Infectious Tuberculosis, 2005

CHALLENGE:

How to fit 50 pages of

NEW recommendations

into 15 minutes??


Contents – “Soup to nuts” Tuberculosis, 2005

  • Purpose

  • Summary

  • Introduction and Background 7. Expanding Contact Investigations

  • Decision to Initiate a Contact

  • Investigation 8. Data Management and Evaluation

  • Investigation of the Presenting Patient 9. Confidentiality and Consent

  • Prioritization of Contacts 10. Staffing and Training for Contact Investigations

  • Evaluation of Contacts 11. Contact Investigations in Special Circumstances

  • 6. Medical Management of Contacts 12. Source Case Investigations

  •   13. Special Topics


Decisions to initiate a contact investigation

Decisions to Initiate a Tuberculosis, 2005Contact Investigation


Decision to initiate a tb contact investigation

18 Tuberculosis, 2005

Decision to Initiate a TB Contact Investigation

*Acid-fast bacilli

†Nucleic acid assay

§Approved indication for NAA

¶Chest radiograph



Phases
PHASES Tuberculosis, 2005

  • Pre-interview

  • Determining the infectious period

  • Interviewing the patient

  • Proxy interview

  • Field investigation

  • Follow up steps

  • Specific investigation plan


Estimating the beginning of the infectious period

26 Tuberculosis, 2005

Estimating the Beginning of the Infectious Period


Phases1
PHASES Tuberculosis, 2005

  • Pre-interview

  • Determining the infectious period

  • Interviewing the patient

  • Proxy interview

  • Field investigation - potential sites of transmission

  • Follow up steps - frequent reassessments

  • Specific investigation plan


Exposure period for contacts

28 Tuberculosis, 2005

Exposure Period for Contacts

Determined by: how much time the contact spent with the index patient during the infectious period


Goal prevention
Goal = PREVENTION Tuberculosis, 2005


Assigning priorities to contacts
Assigning Priorities to Tuberculosis, 2005Contacts

  • Priorities should be assigned to contacts and resources allocated to complete all investigative steps for high-and medium-priority contacts.

  • Any contact not classified as high or medium priority is assigned a low priority.


Factors for assigning contact priorities
Factors for Assigning Tuberculosis, 2005Contact Priorities

  • Characteristics of the index patient

  • Characteristics of contacts

  • Age

  • Immune status

  • Other medical conditions

  • Exposure


Prioritization of contacts 1

41 Tuberculosis, 2005

Prioritization of Contacts (1)


Prioritization of contacts 2

42 Tuberculosis, 2005

Prioritization of Contacts (2)



Initial assessment of contacts

45 Tuberculosis, 2005

Initial Assessment of Contacts

  • Should be accomplished within 3 working days of the contact having been listed in the investigation

  • Gathers background health information

  • Permits face-to-face assessment of person’s health


Tuberculin skin testing
Tuberculin Skin Testing Tuberculosis, 2005

  • All high or medium priority contacts who do not have a documented previous positive tuberculin skin test (TST) or previous TB disease should receive a TST at the initial encounter.

  • If not possible, TST should be administered

    • ≤7 working days of listing high-priority contacts

    • ≤14 days of listing medium-priority contacts


Postexposure tuberculin skin testing
Postexposure Tuberculin Tuberculosis, 2005Skin Testing

  • Window period is 8–10 weeks after exposure ends

  • Contacts who have a positive result after a previous negative result are said to have had a change in tuberculin status from negative to positive


Medical evaluation

53 Tuberculosis, 2005

Medical Evaluation

All contacts whose skin test reaction induration is ≥5 mm or who report any symptoms consistent with TB disease should undergo further examination and testing for TB


Evaluation and follow up of children 5 years of age
Evaluation and Follow-up of Children <5 Years of Age Tuberculosis, 2005

  • Always assigned a high priority as contacts

  • Should receive full diagnostic medical evaluation, including a chest radiograph

  • If TST ≤5 mm of induration and last exposure <8 weeks, LTBI treatment recommended (after TB disease excluded)

  • Second TST 8–10 weeks after exposure; decision to treat is reconsidered

    • Negative TST – treatment discontinued

    • Positive TST – treatment continued

      See Figure 7 (algorithm)


Evaluation and follow up of immunosuppressed contacts
Evaluation and Follow-up of Immunosuppressed Contacts Tuberculosis, 2005

  • Should receive full diagnostic medical evaluation, including a chest radiograph

  • If TST negative ≥8 weeks after end of exposure, full course of treatment for LTBI recommended (after TB disease is excluded)

    See Figure 6 (algorithm)


Medical treatment for contacts with ltbi

Medical Treatment for Tuberculosis, 2005Contacts with LTBI


Window period prophylaxis
Window-Period Prophylaxis Tuberculosis, 2005

  • The frequency, duration, and intensity of exposure

  • Corroborative evidence of transmission from the index patient

Decision to treat contacts with a negative skin test result should take the following factors into consideration


Health department responsibilities
Health Department Responsibilities Tuberculosis, 2005

  • Focusing resources on contacts in most need of treatment

  • Monitoring treatment, including that of contacts who receive care outside the health department

  • Providing directly observed therapy (DOT), incentives, and enablers


Selecting contacts for directly observed therapy
Selecting Contacts for Directly Observed Therapy Tuberculosis, 2005

  • Contacts aged <5 years

  • Contacts who are HIV infected or otherwise substantially immunocompromised

  • Contacts with a change in their tuberculin skin test status from negative to positive

  • Contacts who might not complete treatment because of social or behavior impediments


When to expand a contact investigation

When to Expand a Tuberculosis, 2005Contact Investigation


When to expand a contact investigation1

When to Expand a Tuberculosis, 2005Contact Investigation

  • Achievement of program objectives with high and medium priority contacts

  • Extent of recent transmission

    • Unexpectedly high rate of infection or TB disease in high priority contacts (e.g. 10% or at least twice the rate of a similar population without recent exposure, whichever is greater)

    • Evidence of secondary transmission

    • TB disease in any contact who had been assigned a low priority

    • Infection of contacts aged <5 years and

    • Contacts with change of skin test status from negative to positive between their first and second TST


Communicating through the news media

Communicating Through Tuberculosis, 2005the News Media



Second TST Reminder Tuberculosis, 2005

Preventive Therapy Review – high priority contacts not started on Rx

Contact Progress Reports

3 & 6 months

Contact Line Listing

Semi-Annual Report

CDC Contact Report

REPORTS

What, where, when, ?…


Data management and evaluation of contact investigations1
Data Management and Evaluation of Contact Investigations Tuberculosis, 2005

  • Table 4: Index patient minimal recommended data

  • Table 5: contact minimal recommended data

  • Box 2: Recommended contact investigation objectives by key indicators

  • Methods for data collection and storage



Staffing and training for contact investigations

Staffing and Training for Tuberculosis, 2005Contact Investigations


Staffing and training for contact investigations1
Staffing and Training for Tuberculosis, 2005Contact Investigations

Box 3: Specialized functions for contact investigations (e.g. interviewing, case management, etc.)

Box 4: Positions and titles used


Contact investigations in special circumstances

Contact Investigations in Tuberculosis, 2005Special Circumstances


Definition of an outbreak
Definition of an Outbreak Tuberculosis, 2005

  • During (and because of) a contact investigation, 2 or more contacts are found to have active TB, regardless of their assigned priority; or

  • Any 2 or more cases occurring within a year of each other, discovered to be linked, and the linkage is established outside of a contact investigation


Congregate settings
Congregate Settings Tuberculosis, 2005

Concerns associated with congregate settings

  • Substantial number of contacts

  • Incomplete information regarding contact names and locations

  • Incomplete data for determining priorities

  • Difficulty in maintaining confidentiality

  • Collaboration with officials and administrators who are unfamiliar with TB

  • Legal implications

  • Media coverage


Correctional facilities
Correctional Facilities Tuberculosis, 2005

  • Establish preexisting formal collaboration between correctional and public health officials

  • Trace high-priority contacts who are transferred, released, or paroled before medical evaluation for TB

  • Low completion rate is anticipated unless follow-through

  • supervision can be arranged

    for released or paroled

    inmates


Workplaces
Workplaces Tuberculosis, 2005

  • Duration and proximity of exposure can be greater than for other settings

  • Details to gather from index patient during initial interview include

    • Employment hours

    • Working conditions

    • Workplace contacts

  • Occasional customers of workplace should be designated as low priority


Hospitals and other health care settings
Hospitals and Other Tuberculosis, 2005 Health-Care Settings

  • Personnel collaborating with hospitals and other health-care agencies should have knowledge of legal requirements

  • Plan investigation jointly with health department and setting (division of responsibilities)

  • Majority of health-care settings have policies for testing employees for M. tuberculosis infection


Schools
Schools Tuberculosis, 2005

  • Early collaboration with school officials and community members is recommended

  • Issues of consent, assent, and disclosure of information more complex for minors

  • Site visits should be conducted to check indoor spaces, observe general conditions, and interview maintenance personnel regarding ventilation


Shelters and other settings providing services for homeless persons
Shelters and Other Settings Providing Services for Homeless Persons

  • Challenges include

    • Locating the patient and contacts if mobile

    • Episodic incarceration

    • Migration from one jurisdiction to another

    • Psychiatric illnesses

    • Preexisting medical conditions

  • Site visits and interviews are crucial

  • Work with setting administrators to offer onsite supervised intermittent treatment


Interjurisdictional contact investigations
Interjurisdictional Contact Investigations Persons

  • Requires joint strategies for finding contacts, having them evaluated, treating infected contacts, and gathering data

  • Health department that counts index patient is responsible for leading the investigation and notifying health departments in other jurisdictions



Child with tb disease

94 Persons

Child with TB Disease

  • Source-case investigations considered for children <5 years of age

  • May be started before diagnosis of TB confirmed


Child with ltbi
Child with LTBI Persons

  • Search for source of infection for child is unlikely to be productive

  • Recommended only with infected children <2 years of age, and only if data are monitored to determine the value of the investigation


Cultural competency and social network analysis

Cultural Competency and PersonsSocial Network Analysis


PersonsEvery encounter between a health care provider and a patient is a cross-cultural experience.”

Dr. Arthur Kleinman, Harvard psychiatrist and anthropologist


A social network with a place

Juan Persons

Bill

Rose

Ted

A Social Network with A Place

Mel’s Bar

Rita

Ali

Moe


Investigation of contacts of persons with infectious tuberculosis 20052

5 Persons

Investigation of Contacts of Persons with Infectious Tuberculosis, 2005

CHALLENGE:

How to fit 50 pages of

NEW recommendations

into 15 minutes??


Investigation of contacts of persons with infectious tuberculosis 20053

Investigation of Contacts of Persons with Infectious Tuberculosis, 2005

National Tuberculosis Controllers Association

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Division of Tuberculosis Elimination

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

http://www.cdc.gov/nchstp/tb


ad