1 / 31

802.11e Wireless LANs

Speaker : Fu-Yuan Chuang Advisor : Ho-Ting Wu Date : 2007.01.02. 802.11e Wireless LANs. Outline. Introduction to IEEE 802.11e Tuning of 802.11e Network Parameters Adaptive Contention-Window MAC Algorithms for QoS-Enabled Wireless LANs. Introduction to IEEE 802.11e. New terminology

milly
Download Presentation

802.11e Wireless LANs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Speaker:Fu-Yuan Chuang Advisor:Ho-Ting Wu Date:2007.01.02 802.11e Wireless LANs

  2. Outline • Introduction to IEEE 802.11e • Tuning of 802.11e Network Parameters • Adaptive Contention-Window MAC Algorithms for QoS-Enabled Wireless LANs

  3. Introduction to IEEE 802.11e • New terminology • QAP – QoS Access Point • QSTA – QoS Station • HC – Hybrid Coordinator • A new mechanism defined in IEEE 802.11e -- Hybrid Coordination Function(HCF) • HCF is implemented by all QAPs and QSTAs • HCF has two access mechanisms • Contention based • Enhanced distributed channel access (EDCA) • Controlled channel access • HCF Controlled Channel Access (HCCA)

  4. Architecture

  5. Comparison of 802.11 and 802.11e CAP controlled access phase : A time period when the HC maintains control of the medium after gaining medium access by sensing the channel to be idle for a PIFS duration

  6. Transmission Opportunity (TXOP) • Under HCF, TXOP is basic unit of transmission • TXOP types • EDCA TXOP • Obtained by a QSTA winning an instance of EDCA contention during the CP • HCCA TXOP • Obtained using the controlled channel access • Polled TXOP • by a non-AP QSTA receiving a QoS (+)CF-Pollframe during the CP or CFP

  7. Enhanced Distributed Channel Access (EDCA) • EDCA defines four Access Categories (AC) • Voice • Video • Best Effort • Background • EDCA supports 8 User Priority (UP) values • Priority values (0 to 7) identical to the IEEE 802.11D priorities • Rules • One UP belongs to one AC (Access Category) • Each AC may contains more than one UP • Traffic of higher UP will be transmitted first within one AC

  8. EDCA-Access Category (AC) • Four access categories (ACs) that support the delivery of traffic with differentiated UPs • An AC is an enhanced variant of the DCF which contends for TXOP using the following parameters: CWmin[AC], CWmax[AC], AIFS[AC]. • Each AC queue functions as an independent DCF STA and uses its own backoff parameter. • In EDCA, the Contention-Window (CW) size and the Inter-frame space (IFS) is AC dependent

  9. EDCA Details • Each AC has its own • Interframe space – AIFS • Back off Counter • CWmin, CWmax, CW • TXOP limit • QSTAs obtains these info from beacon frames • Each QSTA implements own queues for each AC • If internal collision happens, the frame with higher priority will be sent

  10. ACM : admission control mandatory ACI : Access category identify EDCA Parameter Set element

  11. Contentions among Different ACs in EDCA • Contention among EDCAFs (AC, AIFS, CWmin , CWmax ) to win a TXOP

  12. Default Values for Each AC AIFS[AC] = AIFSN[AC] × aSlotTime + aSIFSTime. DIFS=2*aSlotTime +aSIFSTime

  13. Juliana Freitag, Nelson L. S. da Fonseca, and Jos´e F. de Rezende, “Tuning of 802.11e Network Parameters,” IEEE Communications Letters , Volume 10,  Issue 8,  Aug. 2006 Page(s):611 - 613 Tuning of 802.11e Network Parameters

  14. Introduction • A novel mechanism for tuning the access parameters of 802.11e QAP and QSTAs • To solve the asymmetry problem • To produce balanced uplink and downlink delays • The network can operate under much higher loads

  15. Introduction - asymmetry problem • the existing asymmetry between the uplink and downlink delays which occurs when using the 802.11e contention method • The QAP is responsible for forwarding all traffic to/from QSTAs • Since both QAP and QSTAs have the same probability of accessing the medium, the queues in the QAP can rapidly build up, increasing the downlink delay

  16. The Proposed Approach • The adjustment of TXOP value is used to improve the throughput of the classes at the QAP leading to more balanced delay

  17. Idea - TXOP • 假設每個QSTA在每個Class中有一個flow,第i個Class的TXOP允許q個frames被傳送 • 則在QAP中第i個Class的TXOP的值調整為可以傳送k*q個frames (k為第i個class中downlink flow的數目) • 可讓downlink throughput接近uplink throughput

  18. Mechanism • Load最小的Class將其TXOP設為0 • 只可傳送一個frame • 其他class根據一個ratio調整TXOP • The ratio between the load that has arrived at their queues and the load that has arrived at the queue of the class with the lowest load • 可讓load大的queue獲得較大的傳送時間

  19. CW • 當STA數目不多時,low CWmin可以減少idle的時間並增進channel utilization • 當STA數目過多時,high CWmin可以避免collision • As the number of stations with active flows of a certain class increases, the CWmin value of this class should increase as well as that of all classes with lower access priority

  20. Mechanism • 若STA(在class i中有active flows)數目大於CWmin(i),則CWmin(i) is increased to the next power of 2 minus 1 • 反之,則CWmin(i) value is reduced to the immediate lower power of 2,縮短idel的時間

  21. Samer El Housseini, Hussein Alnuweiri, “Adaptive Contention-Window MAC Algorithms for QoS-Enabled Wireless LANs,” wireless Networks, Communications and Mobile Computing, 2005 International Conference on , Vol.1,  pp. 368- 374, June 2005 Adaptive Contention-Window MAC Algorithms forQoS-Enabled Wireless LANs

  22. Saturation Throughput

  23. The Throughput Derivative Algorithm • after each CW change, the TD Algorithm employs measurements of the throughput taken in the AP • CWmax is also changed while keeping the same ratio (CWmax / CWmin)

  24. The Throughput Derivative Algorithm • The throughput derivative is taken over the present and a few past measurements of the throughput • If the derivative is positive • The AP continues to increase the CW • If the derivative is negative • The AP decrease the CW

  25. The Throughput Derivative Algorithm

  26. References • IEEE-802.11WG, “IEEE Standard for Information technology - Telecommunications and information exchange between systems - Local and metropolitan area networks - Specific requirements Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications Amendment 8: Medium Access Control (MAC) Quality of Service Enhancements,” November 2005 • Juliana Freitag, Nelson L. S. da Fonseca, and Jos´e F. de Rezende, “Tuning of 802.11e Network Parameters,” IEEE Communications Letters , Volume 10,  Issue 8,  Aug. 2006 Page(s):611 – 613 • Samer El Housseini, Hussein Alnuweiri, “Adaptive Contention-Window MAC Algorithms for QoS-Enabled Wireless LANs,” wireless Networks, Communications and Mobile Computing, 2005 International Conference on , Vol.1,  pp. 368- 374, June 2005

More Related