1 / 17

Computer Ethics PHILOSOPHICAL BELIEF SYSTEMS Chapter 1

Computer Ethics PHILOSOPHICAL BELIEF SYSTEMS Chapter 1. Hassan Ismail. PHILOSOPHICAL BELIEF SYSTEMS. The concept of a system A "system" is a unified whole made up of interdependent parts No single part can perform the total functions of the whole Parts must depend on each other

millardj
Download Presentation

Computer Ethics PHILOSOPHICAL BELIEF SYSTEMS Chapter 1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Computer EthicsPHILOSOPHICAL BELIEF SYSTEMSChapter 1 Hassan Ismail

  2. PHILOSOPHICAL BELIEF SYSTEMS • The concept of a system • A "system" is a unified whole made up of interdependent parts • No single part can perform the total functions of the whole • Parts must depend on each other • The parts must be compatible

  3. PhilosophicSystems • There are four philosophy systems: • Idealism, Naturalism, Pragmatism, and Existentialism • Philosophy systems, are composed of interdependent parts • These are: metaphysics, epistemology, and axiology

  4. Metaphysics • Metaphysics is the theory of the ultimate nature of reality • It asks the question: what is real? • It is simply a belief held by a person as to what is the best explanation of reality • Or what reality means, in that person's view

  5. Epistemology and Axiology • Epistemology is the theory of truth or knowledge • It asks the question:what is true, and how do we come to know that truth? • Axiology is the theory of value or worth • It asks the question: what is good and bad? • It is made up of two sub-parts: ethics and aesthetics

  6. CompatibilityofParts • The parts of philosophic system must be compatible with one another • Metaphysics is the controlling element of philosophy • Metaphysics determines epistemology andaxiology • We will be concerned mainly with how different metaphysical views influence different ethical views

  7. Idealism • Idealistic Reality: • The Idealist believes that reality is basically spirit, rather than matter • He believes that The world of spirit or idea is static and absolute. • Idealistic Ethics: • For the Idealist, goodness is found in the ideal • Perfect goodness is never to be found in the material world (imperatives stated in always, never) • Evil, for the Idealist, consists of the absence or distortion of the ideal

  8. Idealism • Idealists judge solely on the action itself and not on the results of the action • There are some exceptions (lesser of two evils)

  9. Naturalism • Naturalistic Reality: • The Naturalist believes that reality is basically matter (i.e., the physical universe), rather than spirit • For the Naturalist, the thing is more real than the idea. • Whatever exists is therefore primarily material, natural, and physical • The universe, according to the Naturalist, is one of natural design and order

  10. Naturalism • Naturalistic Ethics: • For the Naturalist, the baseline of value is that which is natural • Nature is good. We need not look beyond nature to some immaterial ideal for a standard of right and wrong. • Goodness will be found by living in harmony with nature • Evil is a departure from this natural norm either in the direction of excess or defect • It is a breaking of the natural law

  11. Pragmatism • Pragmatic Reality: • For the Pragmatist, reality is not so easily pinpointed as it is for the Idealist and Naturalist • Reality is neither an idea nor is it matter (i.e. neither a spiritual nor physical "something.”) • Pragmatist believes that reality is a process. It is a dynamic thing • It is change, happening, activity, interaction...in short, it is experience • For the Pragmatist, everything is essentially relative. The only constant is change

  12. Pragmatism • Pragmatic Ethics: • The Pragmatist believes that value claims must be tested and proven in practice • There is nothing that is always good, nor is there anything that is always bad • Pragmatist believes that moral judgments should not be based on the action that is done, but rather on the results of that action • The value of anything is determined solely in terms of its usefulness in achieving some end …is it good? • Thus, the Pragmatist believes that the end justifies the means

  13. Pragmatism • A a means is not valued for its own sake, but only in relation to its usefulness for achieving some end (Results or Consequences are the measure). • For the Pragmatist, there can be no assurance that something is good until it is tried • There can be a dispute about which means are more effective for achieving an end • So there can be a dispute about which ends should, in fact, be pursued • Pragmatist looks for guidance from the group • Reality is experience, but it is the experience of the whole (the group)

  14. Existentialism • Existentialistic Reality: • The Existentialist joins with the Pragmatist in rejecting the belief that reality is fixed and static • Existentialist believes that reality must be defined by each independent individual • Existentialist would say that the world is literally without meaning • Any meaning that gets into the world must be put into it by the individual, and will hold only for that individual • A person's world is what that person chooses it to be • Thus, reality is different for each individual

  15. Existentialism • Existentialistic Ethics: • As with knowledge, the individual must create his/her own value (no escape) • the individual must express his own preferences about things • In making choices, or defining values, the individual becomes responsible for those choices • If the choices were freely made, then responsibility for them must be accepted • Evil, for the Existentialist, is being false to self • It is a breaking of one's personal law

  16. Conclusion • An Idealist, a Naturalist, a Pragmatist, and an Existentialist may all agree upon the morality of a particular action , but for different reasons: • the Idealist because it conforms to some ideal • the Naturalist because it is natural • the Pragmatist because it is socially useful • the Existentialist because he has decided that it is good

  17. END OF CHAPTER ONE THANKS

More Related