MBA REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Download
1 / 18

MBA REGULATORY COMPLIANCE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 212 Views
  • Updated On :

MBA REGULATORY COMPLIANCE RECENT TRENDS IN TILA AND STATE UNFAIR AND DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT CLAIMS Reid S. Manley, Esquire Birmingham, Alabama Burr Forman LLP. Relief under TILA Focus on rescission what constitutes a violation Tender requirement Tolerances

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'MBA REGULATORY COMPLIANCE' - mike_john


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Slide1 l.jpg

MBA REGULATORY COMPLIANCERECENT TRENDS IN TILA ANDSTATE UNFAIR AND DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT CLAIMSReid S. Manley, Esquire Birmingham, Alabama Burr Forman LLP


Slide2 l.jpg

  • Relief under TILA

  • Focus on rescission

    • what constitutes a violation

    • Tender requirement

    • Tolerances

  • Unfair & Deceptive Trade Practices Act claims


Slide3 l.jpg

RELIEF UNDER TILA FOR

PRIVATE LITIGANTS

  • Damages

  • Attorneys Fees

  • Rescission

  • Statutory Cap for class actions


Slide4 l.jpg

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS

FOR TILA CLAIMS

  • DAMAGES

  • RESCISSION


Slide5 l.jpg

RESCISSION

  • Material disclosures

    • APR

    • Finance charge

    • Amount financed

    • Total of payments

    • Payment schedule


Slide6 l.jpg

WHAT CONSTITUTES A

VIOLATION

  • Can borrower rescind loan if there is a “technical” violation?


Slide7 l.jpg

COURTS ARE SPLIT

  • Melfi v. WMC Mortgage Corp., 568 F.3d 309 (1st Cir. 2009)

  • Vs.

  • Hamm v. Ameriquest Mort. Co., 506 F.3d 525 (7th Cir. 2007)


Slide8 l.jpg

Melfi

  • “technical deficiencies do not matter if the borrower receives a notice that effectively gives him notice as to the final date of rescission and has the three full days to act


Slide9 l.jpg

HAMM

  • “We have held that, when it comes to TILA, ‘hypertechnicality reigns.’


Slide10 l.jpg


Slide11 l.jpg

RESCISSION 699 (9

  • 15 U.S.C.A. SECTION 1635

  • 3 step process

  • Regulation Z: Within 20 calendar days after receipt of notice of rescission, creditor shall return money and terminate security interest.


Slide12 l.jpg

RESCISSION 699 (9

  • Requirement of “Tender.”

    • Some courts require tender (or demonstration borrower has ability to tender) before lender releases lien:

    • Utilize court’s “equitable powers.”

    • Moore v. Wells Fargo, 597 F. Supp. 2d 612 (E.D. Va. 2009).

    • American Mortg. Network v. Shelton, 486 F.3d 815 (4th Cir. 2007).


Slide13 l.jpg

RESCISSION 699 (9

  • Requirement of “Tender.”

    • Some courts hold that tender is only necessary after lender releases lien.

      • Lippner v. Deutshe Bank Nat. Trust Co., 544 F. Supp. 2d 695 (N.D. Ill. 2008).

      • Velzquez v. HomeAmerican Credit, Inc., 254 F. Supp. 2d 1043, 1045-1046 (N.D. Ill. 2003).


Slide14 l.jpg

RESCISSION & TENDER 699 (9

IN BANKRUPTCY

  • If termination of security interest is required first, lenders end up as unsecured creditors.

    • In re Jaaskelainen, 391 B.R. 627 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2008), overruled byWells Fargo v. Jaaskelainen, 407 B.R. 449 (D. Mass. 2009).

    • Clay v. Johnson, 77 F. Supp. 2d 879 (N.D. Ill. 1999).

    • In re Williams, 291 B.R. 636 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2003).


Slide15 l.jpg

RESCISSION & FORCLOSURE 699 (9

  • Rescission is complete defense to foreclosure.

  • Interplay between:

  • 15 U.S.C. § 1605(f) (1/2 of 1 percent)

    &

  • 15 U.S.C. § 1635(i)(2) ($35).


Slide16 l.jpg

RESCISSION & FORCLOSURE 699 (9

  • When does “foreclosure process” begin?

    • McCutcheon v. America’s Servicing, 560 F.3d 143 (3rd Cir. 2009).

      • Letter warning of foreclosure does not begin process.

    • Glucksman v. First Franklin Fin. Corp., 601 F. Supp. 2d 511 (E.D.N.Y. 2009).

      • Letter stating loan in “special status” and report to CRAs that “foreclosure initiated” may begin process.


Slide17 l.jpg

Unfair & Deceptive Trade Practice Laws 699 (9

  • Application to mortgage loans

    • States are split

      • Some hold exempt from UDTPA laws due to deference to federal statutes and regulations controlling the general area.

        • Jordan v. NovaStar Mortgage, No. 1:080-cv-3587-CAP (N.D. Ga. Sept. 1, 2009).

        • Virginia – Va. Code Ann. § 59.1-199 (2006).

        • West Virginia – W. Va. Code Ann. § 46A-1-105 (2005).


Slide18 l.jpg

Unfair & Deceptive Trace Practice Laws 699 (9

Some states permit UDTPA claims against mortgage lenders:

  • Williams v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 504 F. Supp. 2d 176 (S.D. Tex. 2007).

  • Cole v. Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & Frappier, 965 So. 2d 1228 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007).

  • In re Russell, 72 B.R. 855 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1987).


ad