Lecture Outline: Population Cycles
Download
1 / 31

Lecture Outline: Population Cycles - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 348 Views
  • Updated On :

Lecture Outline: Population Cycles. Some history: beautiful hypotheses and ugly facts. How common are population cycles?. Components of cycles: periods and amplitudes. Questions and hypotheses. Case study: Snowshoe hares (Kluane Project).

Related searches for Lecture Outline: Population Cycles

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Lecture Outline: Population Cycles' - mike_john


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Slide1 l.jpg

Lecture Outline: Population Cycles

  • Some history: beautiful hypotheses and ugly facts

  • How common are population cycles?

  • Components of cycles: periods and amplitudes

  • Questions and hypotheses

  • Case study: Snowshoe hares (Kluane Project)

  • Case study: Specialist predator hypothesis and vole cycles

  • Parasites and red grouse cycles


Slide2 l.jpg

Population cycles—The “holy grail” of ecology

  • Long history of investigation without consensus regarding mechanisms.

  • Hope is that understanding population cycles will provide insight into more general issues of population regulation and dynamics.

  • Archbishop of Uppsala, Sweden published two reports on cyclic fluctuations of northern small rodents in mid-sixteenth century.


Slide3 l.jpg

  • Elton wrote famous textbook “Animal Ecology”.

Charles Elton’s classic paper1 initiated scientific investigation of population cycles that continues today.

1Elton, C. 1924. Periodic fluctuations in number of animals: their causes and effects. Br. J. Exp. Biol. 2:119-163.


Slide4 l.jpg

  • Chitty spent much of his career trying to explain periodic population fluctuations of small mammals but (like many others) had only limited success.

The Chitty hypothesis proposed that the demographic changes occurring in vole and lemming cycles are mediated by natural selection operating on the genetic-behavioral composition of the population.

  • Populations consist of ‘docile’ and ‘aggressive’ types whose fitness varies with population density.

  • At high density, selection favors aggressive types that are good survivors but poor breeders. Population decreases.

  • At low density, selection favors docile type that are good breeders. Population increases.


Slide5 l.jpg

How common are population cycles?

  • Analyzed nearly 700 time series (25+ years) of animal populations for large-scale patterns in cycles.

  • Overall, nearly 30% of time series were cyclic.

Kendall, BE et al. 1998. The macroecology of population dynamics: taxonomic and biogeographic patterns in populations cycles. Ecology Letters 1:160-164.


Slide6 l.jpg

Mammals

How common are population cycles?

  • However, studies were not random sample of species. North American fur-bearing carnivores dominated the mammal data, and most fish species were commercially harvested.

  • For birds, cycles seem to be more common for grouse than for other groups.


Slide7 l.jpg

Components of cycles: period and amplitude (all data were from northern hemisphere), but pattern was driven by mammals.

  • Period is amount of time it takes population to go through complete cycle.

  • Amplitude can be defined as difference between maximum population size and population size at midpoint, but some researchers refer to peak-to-trough amplitudes.

  • In general, periods tend to be fairly consistent for a particular cyclic population, whereas amplitudes are more variable.


Slide8 l.jpg

  • However, often broad spatial synchrony (70 – 1500 km) in population dynamics across a region where cycles occur.

Some classic population cycles

Species Period (yrs) Peak (no./ ha) Trough (no./ha)

  • Snowshoe hare 10 (9 – 11) 1-5 <0.01

  • Northern voles 4 (3 – 5) 50 -300 <0.5

  • Northern lemmings 4 (3 – 5) 10 – 200 <0.1

  • Red grouse 4-10



Slide10 l.jpg

General questions not.

  • What stops population growth at peak densities?

  • What causes ensuing decline?

  • What causes recovery of population growth?

  • What affects the seasonal timing of decline?

  • What determines cycle length and amplitude?


Slide11 l.jpg

Categories of hypotheses for population cycles not.

  • Abiotic (weather, sunspots)

  • Biotic intrinsic (genotypic-phenotypic physiological and behavioral changes)

  • Biotic extrinsic (food, predation, parasites, disease)

  • Much debate on whether any single-factor hypothesis will be adequate to explain cycles or whether multi-factor hypotheses are necessary.

  • Multiple factors could be from same category (e.g., predation-food quality) or from different categories (e.g., food quantity-genotypic/behavioral changes).

  • As usual, many ecologists advocate field experiments to test hypotheses, but these are logistically difficult to conduct for multi-factor hypotheses.



Slide13 l.jpg

Nutrient Recovery Hypothesis not.

(from Pitelka & Batzli 2007)


Slide14 l.jpg

Case study: Snowshoe hare cycles not.

  • Non-territorial herbivore of boreal forest with 10-yr cycle

  • Reproduction: 3-4 litters per summer and average litter size of 5 leverets. Always first breed when 1-yr old, so age at sexual maturity is fixed.

  • Reproductive output reaches peak early in the phase of population increase, falls rapidly while population is still rising, and reaches lowest point during peak density or 1-2 years afterwards.

Krebs, CJ. et al. 2001. What drives the 10-year cycle of snowshoe hares? BioScience 51:25-35.



Slide16 l.jpg

Pattern of survival in snowshoe hares not.

  • Survival begins to decline during the increase phase of the cycle before peak densities are reached (same as for reproduction)

  • Hence, maximal survival and reproduction occur early in increase phase.


Slide17 l.jpg

  • Food quality could be related to increase in secondary chemical compounds (tannins and resins) by plants in response to browsing by hares

  • Little general evidence that overall food quantity is limiting at any time.

  • Only 3% of hare mortalities directly attributed to starvation .

  • Food addition experiment (rabbit chow) resulted in 2-3 fold increase in density (mostly immigration) but hare cycle continue unchanged.

  • Second food addition experiment involved natural food (white spruce)

Causes of cycle

  • Mostly like explanations involve three main factors—food, predation, and social interactions—that might act singly or in combination.

Krebs, CJ. et al. 2001. What drives the 10-year cycle of snowshoe hares? BioScience 51:25-35.


Slide18 l.jpg

Natural food addition experiment quality.

  • Concluded that food shortage by itself is not explanation for hare cycle.


Slide19 l.jpg

Predation hypothesis quality.

  • Cause of death of 95% of radio-collared hares was predation (lynx, coyotes, goshawks, great horned owls).

  • All predators showed strong numerical changes that lagged behind hare cycle 1-2 years.

  • Lynx and coyotes killed more hares per day in peak and decline phase than during increase.

  • Conducted predator exclusion experiment in Yukon (“Kluane Experiment”) in which they kept mammalian predators out of two areas (1 km2 each) using electric fencing.

  • Also added food to one of the predator reduction treatments (note that these fence treatments were not replicated, whereas the controls were).


Slide20 l.jpg

Predation hypothesis quality.

  • Removal of mammalian predators increased survival rates. Again, food seemed to have a relatively minor effect.

  • Cannot pinpoint the role of any particular predator species and emphasize that cycle is not strictly a lynx-hare cycle.


Slide21 l.jpg

  • Likewise, reasons for the low phase that lasts for 2-4 years after decline are not well understood.

  • Nevertheless, Krebs et al. conclude that the 10-year hare cycle is a result of the interaction between predation and food supplies. Predation is dominant process; food effects are indirect. Cyclicity is caused by “time lag in both the indirect effects and the direct effects of predation”.


Slide22 l.jpg

The Specialist Predator Hypothesis and Vole Cycles in Fennoscandia

field vole (Microtus agrestis)

least weasel (Mustela nivalis)

“The Specialist”


Slide23 l.jpg

  • Resident specialists Fennoscandia are strongly coupled with prey, which leads to a delayed numerical response of predators to changes in prey population size and thus destabilizing delayed density-dependent mortality of rodents.

  • Predation by specialist predators might be a sufficient cause for rodent declines.

The Predation Hypothesis and Vole Cycles

Three types of predators: resident specialists, nomadic specialists, and generalists.

  • Generalist predators can prevent vole cycles by switching to prey upon voles when their density is high. They can cause direct density-dependent mortality.

(Hanski et al. 1991. J. Animal Ecology 60:353-367. Hanski et al. 2001. Ecology 82:1505-1520)


Slide24 l.jpg

The Predation Hypothesis and Vole Fennoscandia Cycles

  • Other factors slow population growth of prey at high densities such as resource competition, social interactions (territoriality & infanticide), and generalist and nomadic specialist predators.

  • Nomadic specialistsinclude owls and diurnal raptors that track small mammal populations over large areas (i.e. ‘spatial switching’ instead of prey switching).

Hence, the predation hypothesis predicts that generalist and nomadic predators have a stabilizing effect on rodent dynamics, whereas resident specialist predators drive population cycles.


Slide25 l.jpg

In Fennoscandia, there is an increase in resident generalists and nomadic specialists as you move from north to south.


Slide26 l.jpg

Degree of population fluctuations and cycle length are related to latitude for rodents in Fennoscandia.


Slide27 l.jpg

Cycle amplitude versus latitude for field voles related to latitude for rodents in Fennoscandia.


Slide28 l.jpg

Experimental support for the Predation Hypothesis? related to latitude for rodents in Fennoscandia.

  • Korpimaki and colleagues conducted predator manipulation experiments in large unfenced areas.

  • In first experiment, they manipulated breeding density of raptors that caused a short-term but not long-term change in dynamics of voles.

  • Conducted second experiment in western Finland during decline phase of voles.

  • Removal of just least weasels had no effect, whereas removal of all main predators resulted in densities that were 3-fold higher compared to control areas.


Slide29 l.jpg

Experimental support for the Predation Hypothesis? related to latitude for rodents in Fennoscandia.

  • Replicated predator manipulation experiment in northern England.

  • Three control sites and three weasel removal sites (unfenced).

  • Density of weasels reduced via continuous livetrapping.

  • Weasel removal resulted in ~8% increase in adult survival.

  • Surprisingly, weasel removal resulted in lower juvenile survival.

  • All control and removal populations experienced a cyclic decline during winter.

  • Concluded that the impact of weasel predation on field-vole survival was neither necessary nor sufficient to drive population cycles.

Graham, IM and X Lambin. 2002. J. Animal Ecology 71:946-956


Slide30 l.jpg

Population cycles in red grouse related to latitude for rodents in Fennoscandia.

  • Two main competing hypotheses derived from studies in different geographical regions.

  • Parasite hypothesis (gut nematode) in England.

  • Territoriality hypothesis (aggressiveness and spacing behavior of males) in Scotland.

See assigned reading for latest piece of the puzzle:

Redpath et al. 2006. Testing the role of parasites in driving the cyclic population dynamics of a gamebird. Ecology Letters 9:410-418.


Slide31 l.jpg

The holy grail of population ecology is still out there. related to latitude for rodents in Fennoscandia.

Beautiful hypotheses and ugly facts

or

Practical difficulties in designing field experiments?


ad