Design principles
Download
1 / 71

Design Principles - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 303 Views
  • Updated On :
  • Presentation posted in: Internet / Web

NEEDS. DESIGN. EVALUATE. IMPLEMENT. Design Principles . John C. Tang September 13, 2007. Today. Updates on facebook project Conceptual model Feedback Constraints Affordances Action cycle Gulf of execution Gulf of evaluation Time for group work. facebook group project.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha

Download Presentation

Design Principles

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Design principles l.jpg

NEEDS

DESIGN

EVALUATE

IMPLEMENT

Design Principles

John C. Tang

September 13, 2007


Today l.jpg
Today

  • Updates on facebook project

  • Conceptual model

  • Feedback

  • Constraints

  • Affordances

  • Action cycle

    • Gulf of execution

    • Gulf of evaluation

  • Time for group work


Facebook group project l.jpg
facebook group project

  • Discussion section topic, Sept. 19

    • Introduction to facebook platform

    • Basic familiarity with features, constraints of platform

  • Project ideas

    • Yes! You need to do something different

    • We know about the applications in lists

    • Group design process  generate new idea

    • Convince us why it is better than prior ideas


Facebook group project 2 l.jpg
facebook group project (2)

  • Implementation effort should be realistic

  • Must demonstrate working prototype

    • OK if not all aspects are working

  • User study must test for complete idea

    • Hybrid working prototype, paper prototype

    • Wizard of Oz


Great discussion sections l.jpg
Great discussion sections!

  • Really appreciated good work

  • All slides uploaded to the web site

  • Allowing extra time (until 5:00pm today) to form groups

  • Take advantage of office hours (Brian, me, Christine) for feedback on topic ideas

  • Stanford Big Face(book)-off?


Social networking l.jpg
Social networking

?

  • Social networking fueled by “exhibitionism”

    • Social status

    • Contests

    • Popularity

  • Alternatives

    • Collectivism

    • Activism


Fb causes l.jpg
FB: Causes

  • Promote awareness of UN Millennium project goals

    • Educate people about goals

    • Award “badge” for passing quiz

    • Community recognition for shared awareness


Criteria review facebook application due sept 18 l.jpg
Criteria: Review facebook application (Due Sept. 18)

  • Pick an interesting application

  • Clearly explain to us what it does (illustrated)

  • Observe at least 2 non CS160 people using application (give demographic info)

  • Write review

    • What works well

    • What doesn’t work well

    • Support with evidence from observations

    • Suggested improvements

    • Shouldn’t be more than around 5 pages


Design nuts bolts l.jpg
Design nuts & bolts

  • Identified need

  • Conducted Contextual Inquiry

  • Stimulated ideating skills

  • Exercised visualizing skills

  • Working towards getting pixels on screen


Conceptual model l.jpg
Conceptual model

View of the system as the user believes it to be, especially how the user can act upon it and what the system’s responses mean


Conceptual model of a system l.jpg
Conceptual Model of a System

  • Design Model

    • The model the designer has of how the system works

  • System Image

    • How the system actually works

    • The structure and behavior of the system

  • User’s Model

    • How the user understands how the system works

The most important thing to design is the user’s model. Everything else should be subordinated to making that model clear, obvious, and substantial. That is almost exactly the opposite of how most software is designed. David Liddle


Raising the bar self evident design l.jpg
Raising the bar: self-evident design

  • Back in 1946, users had to be highly trained to use ENIAC

    • Researchers

    • Military

    • technicians



Conceptual model of a system augmented l.jpg
Conceptual Model of a System (augmented)

  • Design Model

    • The model the designer has of how the system works

  • System Image

    • How the system actually works

    • The structure and behavior of the system

  • User’s Model

    • How the user understands how the system works

  • Some “repair” between the designer and user

    • User manual

    • FAQ


A bad example l.jpg
A bad example

  • Radiator control

COLD

HOT


A good conceptual model l.jpg
A good conceptual model

  • Allows users to reason through:

    • What can I do?

    • How do I do it?

    • What result will it have?

    • What is it telling me?


Conceptual model and reality l.jpg
Conceptual Model and Reality

  • User’s conceptual model does not always have to match reality

    • Must be consistent with system’s behavior, reactions


My new refrigerator l.jpg
My new refrigerator

  • Temperature controls for GE EnergyStar refrigerator

  • We know from Norman that this is probably not how refrigerators work

  • But it’s how we want to control temperature


Iterative revision of the conceptual model l.jpg
Iterative revision of the conceptual model

  • As user interacts, conceptual model is revised

    • Breakdowns (unfulfilled expectations or unclear representations) require explicilty revising conceptual model

    • Consistency is key for developing robust conceptual model



Norman s 7 stages of action l.jpg
Norman’s 7 stages of action

  • User

  • Translating goals

  • To actions

  • Based on user’s model


Norman s 7 stages of action22 l.jpg
Norman’s 7 stages of action

  • System presents results back to user

  • According to design model


Gulfs of execution and evaluation l.jpg
Gulfs of execution and evaluation

  • Note: We’re even assuming the computer works perfectly!


The gulfs where thought is required l.jpg
The Gulfs Where thought is required

  • Gulf of execution -- thinking required to figure out how to get something done -- transforming high-level intention into specific physical actions

  • Gulf of evaluation -- thinking required to understand what is being perceived -- transforming raw sensory data into an understanding of objects, properties and events


The gulfs simplified l.jpg
The gulfs simplified

  • Gulf of execution

    • How do I do it?

  • Gulf of evaluation

    • What did it do?

evaluation

execution



Overcoming the gulfs l.jpg
Overcoming the gulfs

  • Gulf of execution

    • Make commands and mechanisms of the system match the thoughts and goals of the user

  • Gulf of evaluation

    • Make output displays present a good conceptual model of the system that is readily perceived, interpreted, and evaluated


Design principles28 l.jpg
Design Principles

  • Visibility

  • Natural mapping

  • Feedback

    Affordances


Visibility l.jpg
Visibility

  • Primary controls visible

  • Secondary controls discoverable


Three crucial visibilities l.jpg
Three crucial “visibilities”

  • Of objects of interest

  • Of available actions

  • Of system status (feedback)




Car radio l.jpg
Car radio

  • Primary controls visible

  • But how do you set radio station preset?


Slide34 l.jpg
iPod

  • How do you scan forward?


Learned conventions l.jpg
Learned conventions

  • De facto standards that become established over time


Natural mapping l.jpg
Natural mapping

  • Naturally connecting user’s model with system model

    • taking advantage of physical analogies and cultural standards

    • Physical properties (stove burner layout)

    • Metaphorical/linguistic (on is up)

    • Analogous function (playback control buttons)

      “Natural” is individual and culture-specific



Natural mappings l.jpg
Natural mappings

  • Minimize the number of cognitive steps to transform action into effect, or perception into comprehension.

  • Applicable to both action and displays (execution and evaluation).

  • Minimize the need for labels, instructions, help systems.


Different contexts for natural l.jpg
Different contexts for “natural”

  • Social and organizational contexts

    • Office work

    • Off the desktop

    • Out-of-doors

  • Cultural norms

    • Red and green

    • Reading direction

    • What may be offensive



Feedback l.jpg
Feedback

  • Timely communication of system status


Visibility of system status feedback l.jpg
Visibility of system status, feedback

  • At all times, the system visually indicates what state it is in.

  • Examples:

  • - Hourglass “wait” icon

  • - Progress bars

  • - Security padlock on browser


Progressive vs interruptive feedback l.jpg
Progressive vs. interruptive feedback

  • Feedback can be progressive, a part of the sequence of actions themselves

  • Feedback can also be interruptive, a break in the sequence of actions

  • Smooth is usually preferred to interruptive


Multimodal feedback l.jpg
Multimodal feedback

  • Visual

  • Aural

  • Tactile

  • Smell?


Affordances l.jpg
Affordances

  • “...the perceived and actual properties of the thing, primarily those fundamental properties that determine just how the thing could possibly be used.” [Norman]


In other words l.jpg
In other words

  • How a thing appears tells us how the thing can be used.

  • (Whether the implied use matches the intended use is a question for design.)



Example48 l.jpg
Example

I’m Clickable


William gaver 1991 l.jpg
William Gaver, 1991

  • “People perceive the environment directly in terms of its potentials for action.”

  • “An affordance of an object … refers to attributes of both the object and the actor.”

  • “…when the apparent affordances of an artifact matches its intended use, the artifact is easy to operate. When apparent affordances suggest different actions than those for which the object is designed, errors are common.”


Affordances and metaphors l.jpg
Affordances and metaphors

  • Metaphors meant to “jump start” user’s conceptual model for a system

  • Affordances meant to “jump start” user’s conceptual model for interacting with an artifact

  • As with metaphors, if affordances are designed poorly, they thwart developing a correct conceptual model


Perceptible affordance l.jpg
Perceptible affordance

  • When there is perceptual information for an existing affordance.

  • Knurling communicates that you can actually move and resize the window with it.


Hidden affordance l.jpg

This is actually a button.

Hidden affordance

  • When there is not perceptual information for an existing affordance.


False affordance l.jpg
False affordance

  • When there is perceptual information for an affordance that does not exist.



Sequential affordance l.jpg
Sequential affordance

  • Acting correctly on a perceptible affordance leads to information indicating new affordances


Perceived affordances l.jpg
Perceived affordances

  • Norman primarily concerned with perceived affordances - what the user understands the affordances to be

  • The correct parts must be visible and they must convey the correct message

  • If you can't see it (or find it) you can't use it

  • Perceived affordance is a combination of what you see, and what you know



Novices l.jpg
Novices

  • Unfamiliar with the system

  • Possibly unfamiliar with the context and domain

  • Often apprehensive about technology

  • Often unwilling to explore interfaces for fear of inflicting permanent damage

  • Confidence develops slowly at first


Experts l.jpg
Experts

  • Familiar with the system, context, and domain

  • Usually comfortable with technology

  • Willing to explore interfaces, try new things, teach themselves (Rely heavily on undo.)

  • Confidence develops quickly


Usability curves for different system types l.jpg

Intermediate

Expert

Proficiency

Proficiency

Time

Time

Novice

Info Kiosk

Proficiency

Proficiency

Time

Time

Usability curves for different system types


Designing for experts and novices l.jpg
Designing for experts and novices

  • Often difficult to design for both at once

  • Experts require rapid control and feedback. The computer is interrupted more by them

  • Novices require steady and comprehensible control and feedback. They are interrupted more by the computer


Experts and novices62 l.jpg
Experts and Novices

  • In direct manipulation interfaces:

    - Provide menu accelerators, keyboard shortcuts

    - Command lines within GUIs (e.g., Visual Studio)

    - Reveal complexity over time

    - Nest complexity in space

    - Make first tier actions most apparent


Assignments l.jpg
Assignments

  • First group assignments!

  • Project topic (Due Sept. 18)

    • Team name (branding)

  • Contextual inquiry (Due Sept. 27)

    • Pick appropriate method

    • Group analysis

    • Report


Project topic due sept 18 l.jpg
Project topic (due Sept. 18)

  • 1 pg. description of project area

    • Need

    • Conceptual approach

    • Similar to “commercial” presentations

    • Email addresses

  • Preferably due in class, but if you need more time, 5:00pm Tuesday

    • Take advantage of office hours

  • Grading criteria: Just do it!


Contextual inquiry due sept 27 l.jpg
Contextual Inquiry (Due Sept. 27)

  • Pick appropriate method

    • Direct observation

    • Surveys

    • Diary study

    • ESM

  • Each team member must do at least one first-hand data collection!


Contextual inquiry due sept 2766 l.jpg
Contextual Inquiry (Due Sept. 27)

  • Group analysis of data

  • Report

    • Method used

      • Participants

      • Activity

    • Analysis

      • Resources used

      • Hindrances encountered

      • Design implications for improvement

      • (Persona)


Contextual inquiry grading criteria l.jpg
Contextual Inquiry: Grading criteria

  • Picking appropriate method

  • Conducting method properly

    • What participants you pick

    • Appropriate description of method

  • Analysis

    • Including data from contextual inquiry

    • Drawing appropriate conclusions

    • Design implications



Next time l.jpg
Next time

  • Readings

    • Norman, DOET, Chapter 3

  • Assignments

    • facebook application review

    • Group project topic


Visibility bad examples l.jpg
Visibility (bad examples)

  • Clear what to do, but is this the best way to enter Social Security number?

  • All the states are visible, but is this the most effective way to select state?


Overwhelming tabs l.jpg
Overwhelming tabs

  • Everything is discoverable, but way too much information


ad
  • Login