Augustine 354 430ad
1 / 31

Augustine - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Updated On :

Augustine (354-430ad). Born in the city of Tagaste near the city of Carthage (in modern day Algeria) in N. Africa Christian mother (Monica) Pagan father (Patricius, who ultimately adopts Christianity) Citizen of the Roman Empire

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Augustine' - mike_john

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Augustine 354 430ad l.jpg

  • Born in the city of Tagaste near the city of Carthage (in modern day Algeria) in N. Africa

    • Christian mother (Monica)

    • Pagan father (Patricius, who ultimately adopts Christianity)

  • Citizen of the Roman Empire

  • Christianity the official religion of the Empire since the edit of Constantine (313ad)

Slide2 l.jpg

  • Educated in Carthage

    • masters rhetoric

    • rejects Christianity

      • embraces sensuality

      • Mistress & Adeodatus

    • Accepts Manichæism

      • two opposed fundamental forces for good and evil (compare the four forces of contemporary physics: weak; strong; electromagnetic; gravity)

      • conflict manifested in all things

      • Explains the inevitability of human moral failing and the existence of evil

Slide3 l.jpg

  • Becomes noted rhetorician

  • Moves to Rome as a teacher in 384

  • Meets and studies w. Ambrose in Milan

    • rejects Manicheanism & accepts (neo) platonism

    • after intellectual struggle adopts Christianity in 387

Slide4 l.jpg

Knowledge and illumination l.jpg
Knowledge and Illumination

  • Distinguish knowledge of

    • sensible particular (contingent) objects

    • nonsensible laws of science (or platonic forms)

      • universality

      • necessity

Slide6 l.jpg

  • Experience

    • limited by space and time

    • results in knowledge of the sensible, contingent particular

    • cannot produce knowledge of the universal and necessary

  • We do have knowledge of the universal and necessary. How?

An example of illumination l.jpg
An Example of Illumination

  • Trickster secretly tells Confederate the answers to questions that Confederate could not otherwise know

    • e.g. “What are the four numbers written on the paper hidden in my desk?”

Slide8 l.jpg

  • Trickster & Confederate publicly perform their trick for Witness

    • Trickster asks the question

    • Confederate “miraculously” answers correctly and amazes Witness

  • Witness concludes

    • Confederate could not have known the (hidden) answers through sensation

    • Trickster must have informed (illumined) Confederate

    • That’s the only way Confederate could have know the answers

Moral of the story l.jpg
Moral of the Story Witness

  • Confederate has knowledge beyond the bounds of sensation

  • Only communication suffices to explain Confederate’s knowledge

    • Certainly, Confederate’s knowledge acquired & not innate

Illumination l.jpg
Illumination Witness

  • Thesis: the only way to explain how a person can have knowledge of universal and necessary scientific laws/forms is to hypothesize that God informs or “illuminates” the person and thereby gives that particular person knowledge of the forms

  • Notice that Illumination involves communication between God and particular individuals

    • Rejection of Platonic Nativism since knowledge of the forms is not common to all persons

  • The process of illumination is unspecified

Rejection of platonic nativism l.jpg
Rejection of Platonic Nativism Witness

  • Illumination is not innate because

    • knowledge of laws/forms is differentiallyacquired during the course of life

      • different people learn different science/forms at different times

  • whereas innate knowledge is common to all and inherent in all throughout life

Arguments for illumination l.jpg
Arguments for Illumination Witness

Argument from Hierarchy

  • The universe is hierarchically organized, with forms at the top and above people

  • Nothing can act upon anything higher in the hierarchy

  • So, people cannot act on forms

Slide13 l.jpg

Slide14 l.jpg

  • Hence, it is the action of the forms upon people that causes knowledge

  • Augustine holds that

    • God = the forms

    • God is the summation of the forms

    • God is the self-knowing creator who creates the universe by establishing (in matter) the forms which exist as ideas in God’s mind

  • So, an individual’s knowledge of the forms is the result of God’s communicating about the forms with the individual knower.

    • God’s communicating with a person is God’s informing the person.

Argument from language l.jpg
Argument from Language knowledge

  • To know a language is to know the meaning of words in the language

  • Meaning distinguishes between co-extensive properties

    • contrast “triangular” & “trilateral”

  • A language learner cannot distinguish co-extensive properties in experience by ostention

  • So, meaning & language cannot be learned experientially

Slide16 l.jpg

Necessity and universality redundant l.jpg
Necessity and Universality but rather taught(redundant)

  • Some people learn scientific laws or forms with full necessity and universality

  • Sensation alone cannot provide such knowledge since it pertains only to the particular

  • Sensation must be supplemented by the universal principle of induction authorizing inference from the particular to the general

  • Illumination must be the source of such knowledge of the principle of induction

Problems w illumination l.jpg
Problems w. Illumination but rather taught

  • If illumination is divine intervention,

    • why does learning require our effort and work?

    • why does God illumine evil people?

    • what is the exact process of illumination?

    • how do you know when you’ve been illumined rather than deceived?

Creation ex nihilo l.jpg
Creation Ex Nihilo but rather taught

  • The universe changes constantly

  • To change is to become something from what was not

    • e.g. if a leaf changes from green to red, it becomes red from what was not, i.e. what was not red

  • So, change requires that something come from nothing, i.e. that something comes from what was not.

Slide20 l.jpg

  • It is impossible under purely natural processes that something come from nothing.

  • So, there must exist something – God – that never changes and miraculously creates each momentary stage of the changing universe from what was not = nothing (ex nihilo).

  • To create ex nihilo is to create without using matter; it is to create simply by decree, command or thought.

Slide21 l.jpg

  • Since God creates the universe something come from nothing.ex nihilo, God is responsible for everything in the universe – both good and bad

  • In creating the universe, God foresees or knows the entire history of the universe in full detail

  • So God knows everything that each person does before he/she does it

Creation ex nihilo and evil l.jpg
Creation something come from nothing.Ex Nihilo and Evil

  • (i) By hypothesis, God is perfect = benevolent, omnipotent, and omniscient

  • (ii) Assume: Evil exists

  • (iii) God created the universe ex nihilo

  • So, God is responsible for evil (assuming evil exists)

Slide23 l.jpg

  • But if God is perfect, God could not be responsible for evil something come from nothing.

  • Now we have a contradiction =

    • God is & is not responsible for evil

  • Contradictions are never true and arise in arguments resulting from one or more false assumptions

  • Hence, either (i), (ii), or (iii) must be false

Slide24 l.jpg

  • Augustine rejects (ii); he asserts that something come from nothing.what we take to be evil is really good

    • Evil is illusory

    • Recognition of evil is a fallible “theoretical inference”, not observation!

      • Recall: Is perception top down?

  • Suffering is really a good thing

    • it appears evil to us as an inference from a false theory = ignorance of God’s purpose in allowing it

Slide25 l.jpg

  • Immorality results when people something come from nothing.freely choose what, contrary to appearance, is actually good yet not as good as what they might otherwise have chosen

    • immorality is really the lesser of two goods, not the reality of evil

The problem of freedom necessity l.jpg
The Problem of Freedom & Necessity something come from nothing.

  • In creating ex nihilo, God knows the entire career of the universe

  • So, God knows every human action before it occurs

  • What God knows shall occur must occur

  • So, every human action that does occur must occur

  • What must occur is necessary

  • So, every human action is necessary

  • What is necessary is not free

  • So, no human action is free!

Fate for atheists l.jpg
Fate for Atheists something come from nothing.

  • All propositions are true or false

  • So, all propositions about the future are true or false

  • Consider all true propositions about the future

    • the ones about you = your autobiography

  • These propositions now indicate what will happen

    • your autobiography indicates all that you will ever do

  • If the propositions about the future are now true, then what they indicate will happen must happen

  • So, what will happen, must happen

  • What must happen is necessary

Slide28 l.jpg

  • So, whatever will happen is necessary something come from nothing.

  • Hence everything that will happen according to your autobiography is necessary

  • Whatever is necessary is not free

  • So, nothing in your autobiography is free

  • Hence you are not free & neither is anyone else

  • Human freedom is illusory

Augustine on freedom l.jpg
Augustine on Freedom something come from nothing.

  • Compatibilism maintains that freedom is compatible with necessity

  • Augustine is a compatibilist: he maintains that

    • God’s omniscience or providence does indeed imply that all human actions are necessary

    • But necessary actions may be voluntary

    • A person’s action is voluntary if the person acts as she wants, decides or wills.

    • A free action is merely a voluntary action.

    • Hence a free action may be a necessary action since voluntary actions may be necessary.

What s freedom l.jpg
What’s Freedom? something come from nothing.

  • Augustine holds that freedom is voluntary action, even if the action is necessary

  • But, assume that you’re imprisoned & cannot leave

    • it is necessary that you stay

    • does your staying voluntarily make your staying free?

Necessary volition l.jpg
Necessary Volition something come from nothing.

  • Augustine holds that freedom is voluntary action, even if the action is necessary

  • But, voluntary actions require volitions

  • Are volitions themselves necessary?

  • If volitions are necessary, are voluntary actions really free?