Ieee 802 15 working group for wireless personal area networks wpans
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 12

IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs ) PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 54 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs ). SG3a Down Selection Subcommittee Closing Report. Contents. Down Selection Decision Summary Scoring Discussion. Down Selection Process. Red = Winner straw poll. Options Considered with Straw Poll Results

Download Presentation

IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs )

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Ieee 802 15 working group for wireless personal area networks wpans

IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

SG3a Down Selection Subcommittee Closing Report

Mary DuVal, TI and Ian Gifford, Consultant


Contents

Contents

  • Down Selection Decision Summary

  • Scoring Discussion

Mary DuVal, TI and Ian Gifford, Consultant


Down selection process

Down Selection Process

Red = Winner straw poll

  • Options Considered with Straw Poll Results

    • Separate Evaluation/Down Selection Voting: 42

    • Evaluation is the Down Selection Voting (combined) : 3

    • Down Selection Voting only: 0

    • Abstain: 14

Mary DuVal, TI and Ian Gifford, Consultant


Evaluation process

Evaluation Process

  • Evaluation is Really 2 discussions (or phases)

    • Criteria Importance Level

      • Mandatory/Optional

      • ABC

        • A: Mandatory requirement

        • B: Important desired requirement

        • C: A nice to have requirement

      • Weighted values (0 – 10)

      • None

    • Scoring

      • Pass/Fail

      • Pugh Matrix

        • Better (+), Same, Worse (-) than a Baseline Solution

      • Rating (n > 2)

      • None

Mary DuVal, TI and Ian Gifford, Consultant


Evaluation process options matrix

Evaluation ProcessOptions Matrix

Scoring

Mary DuVal, TI and Ian Gifford, Consultant


Evaluation process1

Evaluation Process

Grey = Voted off the straw poll

Red = Winner straw poll

Mary DuVal, TI and Ian Gifford, Consultant


Criteria importance level results

Criteria Importance Level Results

Mary DuVal, TI and Ian Gifford, Consultant


Criteria importance level results cont

Criteria Importance Level Results (cont.)

Mary DuVal, TI and Ian Gifford, Consultant


Down selection voting procedure

Down Selection Voting Procedure

Red = Winner straw poll

Options Considered with Straw Poll Results

  • Ranking vote (lowest rank voted off): 2

  • Vote for desired proposal (lowest # of votes is off): 14

  • 2 staged vote (eliminate low support proposals, vote for desired proposal): 22/32

  • Two votes per voting member (lowest number off): 18/21

  • Abstain: 5/5

Mary DuVal, TI and Ian Gifford, Consultant


Down selection procedure activity

Down Selection Procedure Activity

  • Ad-Hoc group met Tuesday evening to develop proposed text for sub-committee

  • Sub-committee reviewed on Thursday, just prior to this presentation (update in minutes of this session)

Mary DuVal, TI and Ian Gifford, Consultant


Scoring discussion

Scoring Discussion

  • Document scoring method in Annex for inclusion in IEEE P802.15-02/105 Alternate PHY Selection Criteria

  • Next Decisions

    • Extent of Scoring: tabulated information vs. tabulated information with committee analysis

    • Criteria to Score: only most important (A’s only) vs. all criteria

    • Definition of N > 2 Rating

      • ++ / + / 0 / - / --

      • Far Exceeds / Exceeds / Meets / Not Meet / Unacceptable

      • + / 0 / -

      • Unacceptable / Acceptable / Superior

Mary DuVal, TI and Ian Gifford, Consultant


Thank you to everyone for driving towards solid decisions

Thank you to everyone for driving towards solid decisions!!!!

Mary DuVal, TI and Ian Gifford, Consultant


  • Login