1 / 21

Pbar Transverse Instability in Main Injector

Pbar Transverse Instability in Main Injector. Ming-Jen Yang, Main Injector Jim Zagel, Instrumentation 04/12/2010. Study. Initially motivated by Noisy in MI flying wire beam profile Changed PMT high voltage Replaced PMT paddle in the tunnel Noisy only on pbar from RR.

miette
Download Presentation

Pbar Transverse Instability in Main Injector

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Pbar Transverse Instabilityin Main Injector Ming-Jen Yang, Main Injector Jim Zagel, Instrumentation 04/12/2010

  2. Study • Initially motivated by • Noisy in MI flying wire beam profile • Changed PMT high voltage • Replaced PMT paddle in the tunnel • Noisy only on pbar from RR. • Installed RTD720 digitizer at MI10 • Digitize monitor signal supplied by FW system • Raw PMT signal • FW integrated loss signal. • Independent of FW front end • Turn-by-turn. • No decimation.

  3. First data set, S7669x1 Output of MI FW integrator, integrating over four pbar bunches. Break-down occurred when signal was too large.

  4. Acc. to RR transfer, for comparison Scale of oscillation is quite a bit smaller. MI transverse plane damper are in use for this type of transfers.

  5. S7685x1 Pbarfrom RR, Vertical Flying Wire There is no apparent vertical plane oscillation at 8-GeV.

  6. 150 GeV pbar, S7706x1 Horizontal Flying Wire No apparent horizontal plane oscillation at 150 GeV.

  7. S7682x1, with PMT paddle replaced No break-down, but Oscillation is still as big as before.

  8. Reconstructed horizontal beam profile bunch# 1 bunch# 2 bunch# 4 bunch# 3 Peak integrated amplitude from each successive traces, for each bunch.

  9. Horizontal beam profile, as reported by FW bunch# 1 bunch# 2 bunch# 4 bunch# 3 Good agreement with the reconstructed profiles shown in previous slide.

  10. FFT on reconstructed profile, bunch #3 FFT spectrum from TBT BPM position at injection. 39136.4 Hz Tune = 39136.4 / 89815.3 = 0.4357 FFT spectrum of bunch#3 profile.

  11. Observation • Hashing in the profile • Result of betatron oscillation • Give the same Tune as measured with TBT BPM. • Bunch # 1 • Minimal oscillation. • Clean profile from both version. • Bunch #3 • Substantial oscillation. • Noisy FW profile. • Bunch #2 & #4 • Comparison not as clear-cut. • Double peak feature • Caused by PMT break-down. • Disappeared with reduced high voltage. • FW profiles are similar to the reconstructed profiles.

  12. Adjusting MI chromaticity, nominal setting S7724, xfer #1 Chrom. H: -12 Chrom. V: -13 Oscillation: large FWH integrator signal Color legend: Outside plate Inside plate Difference MI horizontal wide-band pickup

  13. Adjusting MI chromaticity, -3 units S7724, xfer #1 Chrom. H: -15 Chrom. V: -16 Oscillation: smaller FWH integrator signal Legend: Signal - Outside plate Signal - inside plate Signal Difference MI horizontal wide-band pickup

  14. Adjusting MI chromaticity, -6 units S7724, xfer #1 Chrom. H: -18 Chrom. V: -19 Oscillation: invisible FWH integrator signal Legend: Signal - Outside plate Signal - inside plate Signal Difference MI horizontal wide-band pickup

  15. Adjusting MI chromaticity, -12 units S7724, xfer #1 Chrom. H: -24 Chrom. V: -25 Oscillation: invisible FWH integrator signal Legend: Signal - Outside plate Signal - inside plate Signal Difference MI horizontal wide-band pickup

  16. Signal of Wide-band, at injection Nearly perfect beam with no sign of beam distortion from RR.

  17. Wall Current Monitor signal, pbar bunch #1 Long profile: at injection Long profile: when flying wire flew

  18. Wall Current Monitor signal, pbar bunch #2 Long profile: at injection Long profile: when flying wire flew

  19. Wall Current Monitor signal, pbar bunch #3 Long profile: at injection Long profile: when flying wire flew

  20. Wall Current Monitor signal, pbar bunch #4 Long profile: at injection Long profile: when flying wire flew

  21. Summary • At injection • No visible beam profile distortion. • Neither longitudinal nor horizontal. • At the time when flying wire flew • Horizontal plane • Bunch #1 show the least amount of distortion. • Bunch #3 & #4 are the worst. • Profiles deteriorated, horizontal and longitudinal. • Vertical plane • None. • At 150 GeV • None. • Pbar from Accumulator to RR • Visible, but smaller, horizontal plane oscillation. • MI transverse damper is in used for these transfers. • Chromaticity damping • Effective. • Set chromaticity to -18 units, from nominal of -12.

More Related