1 / 23

Attempts to fit/understand models: 1920-1995

Attempts to fit/understand models: 1920-1995. Number counts of Galaxies – Hubble,Yoshii/Peterson Angular Size Distances - distant radio cores Kellerman Loitering Universes with z=2 Quasars Luminosity Distance with Brightest Cluster Galaxies. Volume Effects.

michaelhoward
Download Presentation

Attempts to fit/understand models: 1920-1995

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Attempts to fit/understand models: 1920-1995 • Number counts of Galaxies – Hubble,Yoshii/Peterson • Angular Size Distances - distant radio cores Kellerman • Loitering Universes with z=2 Quasars • Luminosity Distance with Brightest Cluster Galaxies

  2. Volume Effects At low z, N z3, for any non-diverging luminosity function, Hubble observed this to be true, demonstrating that Galaxies uniformly fill the local Universe. He and Humason were unable to reach conclusions on Geometry.

  3. Count Objects As a function of Brightness. Euclidean- V proportional to Luminosity Distance Cubed. Not so in Other Universes Do Galaxies Evolve? Are Galaxies created or Destroyed?

  4. Angular Size Distance with Compact Radio Sources Kellerman (1993)

  5. Stepanas & Saha 1995 Result not that constraining

  6. Excess z~2 QSOs: Loitering Universe Petrosian, V., Saltpeter, E.E. & Szekeres, P. 1967

  7. Brightest Cluster Galaxies Sandage, Humason & Mayhall 1956 Baum 1957 Peach 1970 Deceleration q0>1 But Tinsley 1976 showed Evolution dominates Cosmology

  8. cz=1350km/s

  9. cz=6200km/s

  10. Methods for Measuring Extra-Galactic Distances • Brightest Cluster Galaxies • Cepheids • Fundamental Plane (Dn-/Faber Jackson) • Lensing Delay • Planetary Nebulae • Tully-Fisher • Sunyaev-Zeldovich • Surface Brightness Fluctuations • Supernovae Ia • Supernovae II

  11. Relative versus Absolute Distances • Most Astronomical Distance methods are relative. Object A is X times further than object B. They need to be calibrated with a different method in the nearby Universe – A process we call the Astronomical Distance Ladder. • A few distance methods provide Absolute physical distances, independent of the Distance Ladder.

  12. The Distance Ladder • Parallax Distance to nearest Stars • Spectroscopic Parallax of these stars to clusters of stars • Main Sequence Fitting of Clusters to Other Clusters which contain Cepheid Variable Stars • Comparison Cepheid Variable Stars to Cepheids in the Large Magellanic Cloud. • Large Magellanic Cloud is the Anchor of the Extra Galactic Distance Scale

  13. Eclipsing Binaries (Fitzpatrick et al.) Recently Published Values of the Distance to the LMC. Freedman et al 2001

  14. Brightest Cluster Galaxies Sandage et al. (1956) Lauer & Postman 1992 Concentration Advantages: Easy, high-Z possible; Disadvantages: Poor Physical Basis, unexplained results, Evolution

  15. Cepheids • Advantages: • Can be calibrated within Galaxy • Precise (0.1 mag) • Good Physical Basis • Disadvantages: • Observationally Expensive • Limit is Z < 0.01 • Metallicity and Extinction

  16. Fundamental Plane Elliptical Galaxies, Surface Brightess (I) within ½ light radius (R), and velocity dispersion () are correlated • Advantages: • Observationally cheap. • Works to z>0.5 • Disadvantages: • Imprecise • Evolution • Physical Understanding not great • Environmental Effects? L related to R and I Ie surface Brightness with in ½ light radius

  17. Spiral Galaxies Spiral Galaxies supported By Rotation, not by Random Motions. Have recent Star formation, dust And tend to be less massive than elliptical Galaxies

  18. Elliptical Galaxies Supported by random motions of stars, Biggest Galaxies in the Universe. No Dust, No Star formation No Gas, Old Stars

  19. Fundamental Plane Prescription: Measure Flux within an ellipse which contains ½ the light – I=Flux/Area Take Spectrum to measure the velocity dispersion () of the stars.

  20. Lensing Delay input z of lensing galaxy and QSO, positions of lensing galaxy and images of source QSO Get time delay from QSO variability Model galaxy to recover observables And recover distance to lensing galaxy Advantages: Physical Method, works at 0.1>z>1 Disadvantages: Observationally Very Expensive, Model of Galaxy (isothermal) is not yet agreed upon

More Related