1 / 32

Electoral Systems Women and Elections

Electoral Systems Women and Elections. The National Democratic Institute. INTRODUCTIONS/ GROUND RULES. Introductions Ground rules Ice breaker exercise. Photo: NDI. ELECTORAL SYSTEMS OBJECTIVES. To understand the different types of electoral systems

mia-welch
Download Presentation

Electoral Systems Women and Elections

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Electoral SystemsWomen and Elections The National Democratic Institute

  2. INTRODUCTIONS/ GROUND RULES • Introductions • Ground rules • Ice breaker exercise Photo: NDI

  3. ELECTORAL SYSTEMS OBJECTIVES • To understand the different types of electoral systems • To increase awareness of the potential advantages and disadvantages to these systems from a gender perspective

  4. ELECTORAL SYSTEMS TOPICS • Electoral Systems: • Proportional Representation • Majoritarian • Mixed Photo: Kathy Gest

  5. KEY TERMS • Electoral System • Proportional Representation • Majoritarian System • Open/Closed Party List • Gender Quota Photo: NDI

  6. What Do They Do? At the most basic level, electoral systems translate the votes cast in a general election into seats won by parties and candidates. ~ IDEA Electoral System Design Handbook

  7. TYPES OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS Parallel MMP

  8. PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION • Disadvantages • Coalition governments, • which can be unstable • Small parties have • disproportionate power • Accountability • Advantages • Proportionality • Encourage formation of • parties • Facilitate diverse • representation • Candidates need to get • votes from all over, not • just from a particular • region

  9. PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATIONList PR • Multi-member districts • Parties create candidate lists • Voters select a party • Parties are allocated seats based on percentage of vote received • “Open” or “closed” lists • Thresholds very important

  10. BALLOT EXAMPLE Photo: ACE Project

  11. PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATIONList PR • Criticisms • Need more developed • parties • Requires greater • coordination by parties, • concentrates power in • hands of central party • organization • Weakens link between parties • and constituents • Advantages • Reflects proportionality • Allows smaller parties to • compete • Minority and women’s • quotas are easier to • implement • Encourages developed • parties

  12. PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATIONSingle Transferable Vote (STV) • Multi-member districts • Results through series of vote counts • If no one gets quota, candidate with lowest total votes is eliminated and votes redistributed • Continues until all seats are filled

  13. PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATIONSingle Transferable Vote (STV) • Advantages • Voters choose individuals • and parties • Fairly proportional • results • Strengthens party- • constituent connection • Criticisms • Complex/requires higher • literacy • Party members compete • against each other • Party with a plurality of • votes can end up getting • fewer seats

  14. MAJORITARIAN • Also known as “plurality system” • Whoever wins the most votes, wins the election. Photo: Marie-Eve_NDI-Pakistan

  15. MAJORITARIAN TYPES • First Past the Post • Two-Round System • Block Vote • Party Block Vote • Alternate Vote

  16. MAJORITARIANFirst Past the Post (FPTP) • Citizens divided into districts cast a single vote for their candidate • Whoever gets the most votes, wins • More typical of countries where a single individual represents a geographic area

  17. MAJORITARIANFirst Past the Post • Advantages • Simple • Clear choices between candidates • Encourages links between constituents and MPs • Can foster more broad-based politics where there is not a majority ethnic group • Criticisms • Excludes smaller parties • Can lead to exclusion of ethnic minorities • Dependent on electoral boundaries (gerrymandering)

  18. MAJORITARIANTwo-Round System • Similar to FPTP; Candidates require absolute majority • First round of FPTP voting. If someone gets a majority, s/he wins • If not, some candidates may be eliminated and a second vote takes place

  19. MAJORITARIANTwo-Round System • Advantages • Gives voters a second • chance • Encourages bargains and • tradeoffs • Minimizes vote-splitting • Criticisms • Expensive • Similar disadvantages to • FPTP • Can trigger conflict

  20. MAJORITARIANBlock Vote • Multi-member districts • Voters get as many votes as there are candidates—can use all, some or none • “X” number of candidates with highest vote totals elected

  21. MAJORITARIANBlock Vote • Advantages • Voters can pick • individuals • Parties can have a more • active role than in FPTP • Rewards organized • parties • Criticisms • Can exaggerate FPTP • problems • Can fragment parties • Candidate selection must produce a strategic number of candidates with broad appeal

  22. MAJORITARIANParty Block Vote • Multi-member districts • Parties build lists of candidates • Voters choose party list not an individual • Party list gets elected

  23. Advantages Simple Encourages strong parties Can facilitate minority representation Criticisms Suffers from problems of FPTP, particularly disproportionality MAJORITARIAN Party Block Vote

  24. MAJORITARIAN Alternative Vote • Single-member districts • Voters rank candidate preferences • If candidate secures an absolute majority of first choice votes, s/he is elected • If not, candidate with the lowest votes is eliminated, and votes reallocated

  25. MAJORITARIAN Alternative Vote • Criticisms • Complex/ requires higher level of literacy • Centrist outcomes depend more on political context than electoral system • Doesn’t work well with larger, multi-member districts • Advantages • Candidates must seek “first” and “second” votes of voters • Can encourage compromise • Avoids “tactical voting” in FPTP

  26. BALLOT EXAMPLE   Photo: ACE Project, International IDEA Handbook (2005)

  27. ELECTORAL SYSTEM DIMENSIONS • District Size • District Magnitude • Threshold • Party vs. Candidate • Quotas Photo: Kathy Gest

  28. DISTRICT SIZE AND MAGNITUDE • Single or multiple districts? • Number of representatives elected per district (district magnitude) Photo: Megan Doherty, NDI

  29. PARTY LISTS AND THRESHOLD • Open vs. Closed Lists • Higher thresholds tend to result in more women elected

  30. OTHER ELECTORAL SYSTEM DIMENSIONS • Party vs. Candidate • Quotas   Photo: lrobinsonNDI

  31. EXERCISE In small groups, discuss the pros and cons of your current electoral system.

  32. ELECTORAL SYSTEMS REVIEW • Electoral Systems: • Proportional Representation • Majoritarian • Mixed • Electoral System Dimensions • Questions? • Feedback?

More Related