1 / 9

ENUM Validation Architecture & Token Format draft-mayrhofer-enum-validation-00.txt

ENUM Validation Architecture & Token Format draft-mayrhofer-enum-validation-00.txt. Axel Mayrhofer, Otmar Lendl enum.at GmbH Michael Haberler Internet Foundation Austria. overview. sources of validation information goals + setup options architecture token format contents.

mhamel
Download Presentation

ENUM Validation Architecture & Token Format draft-mayrhofer-enum-validation-00.txt

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ENUM Validation Architecture &Token Formatdraft-mayrhofer-enum-validation-00.txt Axel Mayrhofer, Otmar Lendl enum.at GmbH Michael Haberler Internet Foundation Austria

  2. overview • sources of validation information • goals + setup options • architecture • token format contents

  3. sources of validation information

  4. goals • prove the registrant‘s right-to-use in the number • efficient process in common cases • be easy on incumbents or they‘ll never bite • allow for consumer choice • enable ENUM service provision even if NRH is not cooperating • avoid the next monopoly • allow for many sources of validation information • may the best method win • dont tilt new versus existing number use

  5. setup options • centralized validation agent • this is the next monopoly • inefficient on service providers – they know their customers already • multiple validation agents • no monopoly, but still ineffective • number range holder = registrar • „efficient“ on telcos, ITSP‘s • might leave consumer behind • conclusion: no single source works best • so: define Validation Entity as a role • VE might collapse with registrar – easy • it might not: a chain of trust is required

  6. registry validation entity registrar validation entity registrant architecture registration + validation token validation request validation entity registrar validation token delegation request registrant

  7. validation process • requires a chain of trust registry <-> VE • signing of token with XML-DSIG + certificate • contract between VE and registry • assigns ID, describes method, trust chain • open list of methods • regulatory requirement in +43 is by maximum failure rate only • token lifetime determines the domain visibility • token contents is an audit trail

  8. token contents • token MUST contain: • validation „serial number“ • e164 number • validation entity ID • method ID • registrar for whom validation was carried out • create, expiredate • MAY contain • registrant identity: • organisation • commercial entity registration number • title, firstname, lastname, address, streetname, streetnumber, apt,zip code, country, state • phone, fax, email • identity geared towards reuse of directory information as per ITU E.115 • a superset of the hoeneisen-token

  9. contacts • Alexander Mayrhofer enum.at GmbH Phone: +43 1 5056416 34 alexander.mayrhofer@enum.at • Otmar Lendl enum.at GmbH Phone: +43 1 5056416 33 otmar.lendl@enum.at • Michael Haberler Internet Foundation Austria phone +43 664 4213465 mah@eunet.at • registry specification, registrar manual, registrar toolkit, contracts available at www.enum.at

More Related