1 / 17

design protocol analysis game design: art vs science simon ferrari

design protocol analysis game design: art vs science simon ferrari. problem space. game design still considered a “dark art” game design heavily non-disclosed game designers attempting to break into the white cube. zach gage. antagonistic books. killing spree. lose/lose. halcyon.

merle
Download Presentation

design protocol analysis game design: art vs science simon ferrari

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. design protocol analysisgame design: art vs sciencesimon ferrari

  2. problem space • game design still considered a “dark art” • game design heavily non-disclosed • game designers attempting to break into the white cube

  3. zach gage

  4. antagonistic books

  5. killing spree

  6. lose/lose

  7. halcyon

  8. bit pilot

  9. test one: personal design • self-motivated, “personal” design • 90 minutes • record speech, sketches, and code prototypes • find patterns in 4 activity modes • 3 previous + “thinking”

  10. test two: contract design • simulation of contract design work • 90 minutes • design specification provided by me • mobile (iOS), OpenFrameworks, popular genre • record speech, sketches, and code prototypes • find patterns in 4 activity modes

  11. analysis • cross-analysis of contract vs personal design • identify modes during “novel design decisions” • predict speech from cold viewing of sketches

  12. hypothesis • contract and personal design will not significantly differ • even if the designer thinks/says that they are • goals may differ, but methods/tasks will remain the same

  13. motivations • Daniel Fallman (CHI 2003) • “Design-oriented Human-Computer Interaction” • “romantic” • design as art • “conservative” • design as science

  14. motivations • Omer Akin and Chengtah Lin (Design Studies) • “Design protocol data and novel design decisions” • “activity-based model” • thinking, drawing, and speaking • data interpolation experiment

  15. motivations • Ellen Do and Mark Gross (C&C ‘07) • leonardo model • an artist/designer who can code • “owning the problem” • personal, self-motivated design • emphasis on prototypes

  16. motivations • Andrea Goncher (C&C 2009) • “Creativity under Constraints: The Affect of Problem Space on Design Learning among Engineering Students” • how do constraints contribute to decision-making • goal constraints vs. task constraints

  17. thank you

More Related