1 / 17

The Impact of NRC Recommendations on Climate Reconstructions U11B-05

AGU December 2006 Meeting Stephen McIntyre Toronto, Canada www.climateaudit.org/pdf/agu06.ppt. The Impact of NRC Recommendations on Climate Reconstructions U11B-05. NRC Panel and M&M:. Key Recommendations and Findings.

mercia
Download Presentation

The Impact of NRC Recommendations on Climate Reconstructions U11B-05

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AGU December 2006 Meeting Stephen McIntyre Toronto, Canada www.climateaudit.org/pdf/agu06.ppt The Impact of NRC Recommendations on Climate ReconstructionsU11B-05

  2. NRC Panel and M&M:

  3. Key Recommendations and Findings Precipitation-sensitive proxies e.g. “moisture-sensitive trees and isotopes in tropical ice cores” should not be used without “climatologic justification” of any apparent proxy-temperature correlation; Strip-bark bristlecone and foxtails should be “avoided”. Many reconstructions are based on the same datasets and are not independent. Some are not robust with respect to removal of individual proxies.

  4. “Plausible”... NRC panel used 4 reconstructions as comfort for comparing modern-medieval levels, but did verify that cited reconstructions met proxy quality standards. Medieval-modern relationship reverses with trivial and justifiable variations in proxy selection.

  5. Most MBH “proxies” are indistinguishable from high-frequency noise. The pattern comes from bristlecones. Left – 6 MBH99 proxies. Right: top – contribution of proxy “classes” (proxy type * continent) to MBH reconstruction, bristlecones in red. Bottom – same with each proxy class scaled.

  6. Bristlecones and foxtails occupy cold arid niche Mooney: “bristlecone pine is responding in gross terms primarily to a moisture gradient in the White Mts”. Its “main competitor” is sagebrush. Lloyd and Graumlich: “previous winter precipitation is the most important factor governing growth variation”

  7. Underwater medieval trees in the Sierra Nevadas ... • Major long-term changes in local hydrology; • Lakes re-formed only in the Little Ice Age • Graumlich: late 20th century “less remarkable for warmth than for high winter precipitation totals”

  8. Bristlecone/foxtail chronologies are inconsistent with ecological temperature estimates... Miller et al 2006: Medieval forests on summits were “typical of forests currently 300-500m lower”; medieval annual temperatures were “3.2 deg C warmer than at present”. Left: Medieval tree above treeline; right- bristlecone and foxtail ring width chronologies

  9. Spaghetti in the Urals • Briffa’s Yamal chronology inconsistent with other chronologies; • Inconsistent with ecological estimates that medieval temperatures were 2.5-3.5 deg warmer; Top: Spaghetti graph showing Briffa 1995 (black), Briffa 2000 (Yamal – red); Polar Urals update (Esper 2002 – blue) Bottom- Treeline at Polar Urals (Shiyatov 1995)

  10. One site can affect a reconstruction … Blue – Briffa 2000 reconstruction using Yamal chronology; yellow – impact using Polar Urals update. Impact on D'Arrigo et al 2006 will be similar since 5 of 6 series overlap.

  11. δO18 Decreases at Mount Logan and Law Dome No rational basis for attributing Mt Logan and Law Dome to circulation changes, while citing Guliya and tropical cores as evidence of “unusual” temperature increases Panel did not discuss Law Dome when stating that no Antarctic sites show medieval warming

  12. Spaghetti Guliya Three different versions of Thompson’s 1992 Guliya δO18 series used in 2006 studies. Reconciliation and quality control is a prerequisite for statistical analysis. Results from all samples need to be archived.

  13. Monsoon Proxies used in Temperature Composites Top: Three monsoon proxies used in temperature composites; right – journal titles and picture of Dulan juniper

  14. Arbitrary selection of ocean sediment proxies • G. Bulloides pattern is not characteristic of other high-resolution sediment proxies; • Many high-resolution ocean proxies show distinct MWP, even in Antarctica; • Dating precision is insufficient to prove or disprove synchronization

  15. Seeming modern-medieval differential depends on a very few problematic proxies: • Bristlecone/foxtail ring width chronologies • Selection of Yamal, Siberia ring width chronology in preference to updated Polar Urals; • Use of precipitation or even monsoon wind speed proxies in temperature reconstructions – Thompson’s Himalaya ice core isotopes; Arabian Sea cold water G Bulloides; Dulan junipers

  16. A Different Spaghetti Recipe Variations of standard reconstructions using Polar Urals update instead of Yamal and Sargasso Sea SST instead of G Bulloides wind speed proxy and Yakutia instead of problematic bristlecones/foxtails.

  17. Conclusions: • There are very few proxies that actually contribute to seeming modern-medieval differential; • These proxies are used over and over; • These proxies, especially bristlecones, do not meet NRC panel recommendations or reconcile with ecological information; • None of the “comfort” studies meets NRC panel recommendations for proxy quality

More Related