- 96 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

Graphs

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

COMP171

Fall 2006

Graphs

Slides from HKUST

- Extremely useful tool in modeling problems
- Consist of:
- Vertices
- Edges

Vertices can beconsidered “sites”or locations.

Edges represent

connections.

D

E

C

A

F

B

Vertex

Edge

Air flight system

- Each vertex represents a city
- Each edge represents a direct flight between two cities
- A query on direct flights = a query on whether an edge exists
- A query on how to get to a location = does a path exist from A to B
- We can even associate costs to edges (weighted graphs), then ask “what is the cheapest path from A to B”

- Weighted graphs: the cost to connect A and B by a communication line is 7 units.
- Can we build a communication network so that every two vertex are connected with the minimum costs?

Wireless communication

- Represented by a weighted complete graph (every two vertices are connected by an edge)
- Each edge represents the Euclidean distance dij between two stations
- Each station uses a certain power i to transmit messages. Given this power i, only a few nodes can be reached (bold edges). A station reachable by i then uses its own power to relay the message to other stations not reachable by i.
- A typical wireless communication problem is: how to broadcast between all stations such that they are all connected and the power consumption is minimized.

{a,b}

{a,c}

{b,d}

{c,d}

{b,e}

{c,f}

{e,f}

- A graph G=(V, E) consists a set of vertices, V, and a set of edges, E.
- Each edge is a pair of (v, w), where v, w belongs to V
- If the pair is unordered, the graph is undirected; otherwise it is directed
- Consider a simple graph where E is not a multiple set and it doesn’t contain elements of the form {x,x}, i.e. no loop and no multiple edges.

An undirected graph

- If v1 and v2 are connected, they are said to be adjacent vertices
- v1 and v2 are endpoints of the edge {v1, v2}

- A path is a sequence of vertices (v0, v1, v2,… vk) such that:
- For 0 ≤ i < k, {vi, vi+1} is an edge
Note: a path is allowed to go through the same vertex or the same edge any number of times!

- For 0 ≤ i < k, {vi, vi+1} is an edge
- The length of a path is the number of edges on the path
- A closed path is a path with the same starting and ending vertex.

- A path is simple if and only if it does not contain a vertex more than once.
- A closed path is a cycle if and only if it has no repeated edges.
- A graph is connected if there is a path between any two vertices.
- A tree is graph that is connected and has no cycles.

Are these paths?

Any cycles?

What is the path’s length?

- {a,c,f,e}
- {a,b,d,c,f,e}
- {a, c, d, b, d, c, f, e}
- {a,c,d,b,a}
- {a,c,f,e,b,d,c,a}

- A graph is directed if direction is assigned to each edge.
- Directed edges are denoted as arcs.
- Arc is an ordered pair (u, v)

- Recall: for an undirected graph
- An edge is denoted {u,v}, which actually corresponds to two arcs (u,v) and (v,u)

- Since the edges are directed, we need to consider the arcs coming “in” and going “out”
- Thus, we define terms Indegree(v), and Outdegree(v)

- Each arc(u,v) contributes count 1 to the outdegree of u and the indegree of v

- A directed path is a sequence of vertices (v0, v1, . . . , vk)
- Such that (vi, vi+1) is an arc

- A directed cycle is a directed path such that the first and last vertices are the same.
- A directed graph is acyclic if it does not contain any directed cycles

3

6

8

0

7

2

9

1

5

4

Is it a DAG?

- Directed graphs are often used to represent order-dependent tasks
- That is we cannot start a task before another task finishes

- We can model this task dependent constraint using arcs
- An arc (i,j) means task j cannot start until task i is finished
- Clearly, for the system not to hang, the graph must be acyclic

j

Task j cannot start until task i is finished

i

- CS departments course structure

104

180

151

171

221

342

252

201

211

251

271

M111

M132

231

272

361

381

303

343

341

327

334

336

362

332

Any directed cycles?

How many indeg(171)?

How many outdeg(171)?

3

6

8

0

7

2

9

1

5

4

- Topological sort is an algorithm for a directed acyclic graph
- Linearly order the vertices so that the linear order respects the ordering relations implied by the arcs

For example:

0, 1, 2, 5, 9?

0, 4, 5, 9?

0, 6, 3, 7 ?

- Observations
- Starting point must have zero indegree
- If it doesn’t exist, the graph would not be acyclic

- Algorithm
- A vertex with zero indegree is a task that can start right away. So we can output it first in the linear order
- If a vertex i is output, then its outgoing arcs (i, j) are no longer useful, since tasks j does not need to wait for i anymore- so remove all i’s outgoing arcs
- With vertex i removed, the new graph is still a directed acyclic graph. So, repeat step 1-2 until no vertex is left.

- Two popular computer representations of a graph. Both represent the vertex set and the edge set, but in different ways.
- Adjacency Matrix
Use a 2D matrix to represent the graph

- Adjacency List
Use a 1D array of linked lists

- Adjacency Matrix

- The graph G = (V, E) can be represented by a table, or a matrix
M = (aij)n×n aij = 1 iff (vi, vj) ∈E,

assuming V = {v1, …, vn}.

- 2D array A[0..n-1, 0..n-1], where n is the number of vertices in the graph
- Each row and column is indexed by the vertex id
- e,g a=0, b=1, c=2, d=3, e=4

- A[i][j]=1 if there is an edge connecting vertices i and j; otherwise, A[i][j]=0
- The storage requirement is Θ(n2). It is not efficient if the graph has few edges. An adjacency matrix is an appropriate representation if the graph is dense: |E|=Θ(|V|2)
- We can detect in O(1) time whether two vertices are connected.

- The graph G = (V, E) can be represented by a list of vertices and a list of its adjacent vertices for each vertex.

Adjacent vertices for each vertex:

a: {c, d, e}

b: { }

c: {a, e}

d: {a ,e}

e: {a, d, c}

- If the graph is not dense, in other words, sparse, a better solution is an adjacency list
- The adjacency list is an array A[0..n-1] of lists, where n is the number of vertices in the graph.
- Each array entry is indexed by the vertex id
- Each list A[i] stores the ids of the vertices adjacent to vertex i

0

8

2

9

1

7

3

6

4

5

0

8

2

9

1

7

3

6

4

5

- The array takes up Θ(n) space
- Define degree of v, deg(v), to be the number of edges incident to v. Then, the total space to store the graph is proportional to:
- An edge e={u,v} of the graph contributes a count of 1 to deg(u) and contributes a count 1 to deg(v)
- Therefore, Σvertex vdeg(v) = 2m, where m is the total number of edges
- In all, the adjacency list takes up Θ(n+m) space
- If m = O(n2) (i.e. dense graphs), both adjacent matrix and adjacent lists use Θ(n2) space.
- If m = O(n), adjacent list outperform adjacent matrix

- However, one cannot tell in O(1) time whether two vertices are connected

- Adjacency List
- More compact than adjacency matrices if graph has few edges
- Requires more time to find if an edge exists

- Adjacency Matrix
- Always require n2 space
- This can waste a lot of space if the number of edges are sparse

- Can quickly find if an edge exists

- Always require n2 space

- The adjacency matrix and adjacency list can be used

3

6

8

0

7

2

9

1

5

4

1) Choose a vertex v of indegree 0 (what about there are several such vertices?) and output v;

2) Modify the indegree of all the successor of v by subtracting 1;

3) Repeat the above process until all vertices are output.

Find all starting points

Reduce indegree(w)

Place new startvertices on the Q

- We never visited a vertex more than one time
- For each vertex, we had to examine all outgoing edges
- Σ outdegree(v) = m
- This is summed over all vertices, not per vertex

- So, our running time is exactly
- O(n + m)

How about the complexity using adjacency matrix?

- Application example
- Given a graph representation and a vertex s in the graph
- Find all paths from s to other vertices

- Two common graph traversal algorithms
- Breadth-First Search (BFS)
- Find the shortest paths in an unweighted graph

- Depth-First Search (DFS)
- Topological sort
- Find strongly connected components

- Breadth-First Search (BFS)

0

8

2

9

1

7

3

6

4

5

2

s

1

1

2

1

2

2

1

- Given any source vertex s, BFS visits the other vertices at increasing distances away from s. In doing so, BFS discovers paths from s to other vertices for unweighted graphs.
- What do we mean by “distance”? The number of edges on a path from s

Example

Consider s=vertex 1

Nodes at distance 1?

2, 3, 7, 9

Nodes at distance 2?

8, 6, 5, 4

Nodes at distance 3?

0

// flag[ ]: visited table

Why use queue? Need FIFO

- Assume adjacency list
- n = number of vertices m = number of edges

O(n + m)

Each vertex will enter Q at most once.

Each iteration takes time proportional to 1 + deg(v).

- Recall: Given a graph with m edges, what is the total degree?
- The total running time of the while loop is:
this is summing over all the iterations in the while loop!

- See ds.soj.me for practice.

Σvertex v deg(v) = 2m

O( Σvertex v (1 + deg(v)) ) = O(n+m)

- Assume adjacency matrix
- n = number of vertices m = number of edges

O(n2)

Finding the adjacent vertices of v requires checking all elements in the row. This takes linear time O(n).

Summing over all the n iterations, the total running time is O(n2).

So, with adjacency matrix, BFS is O(n2) independent of the number of edges m.

With adjacent lists, BFS is O(n+m); if m=O(n2) like in a dense graph, O(n+m)=O(n2).

- Assume the weighted graph has no negative weights (Why?).
- Single source shortest path problem：find all the shorted paths from source s to other vertices.
- Basic idea: list all the shortest paths from the source s
- Dijkstra’s algorithm is a greedy algorithm, and the correctness of the algorithm can be proved by contradiction.
- Time complexity O(|V|2).

- Ideas of the algorithm (Dijkstra): enumerate the shortest paths from the source to other vertices in increasing order.

Basic observations:

- If (s, u,..,v, w) is a shorted path from s to w, then (s,u,…,v) must be a shortest path form s to v.
- The shortest path from s to v should be the shortest one among those paths from s to v which only go through known shortest paths.
Method:

On every vertex v maintain a pair (known, dist), known: whether the shortest distance from the source s to v is known, dist: the shortest distance from s through known vertices.

1. To list the next shortest path, find the vertex v with smallest dist, and mark v as known.

2. update labels for the successors of v.

3. goto 1 until all the shortest paths are found.

Method:

Mark every vertex v with a pair (known, dist), known: whether the shortest distance from the source s to v is known, dist: the shortest distance from s through known vertices.

- Starting with : mark every vertex v with (F, w(s,v)), s with (T, 0).
- The next shortest distance from s is the one with the smallest dist among vertices (F, dist), and mark that vertex v with T.
- Update dist of those unknown vertices which are adjacent to v ;
- Goto 2 until all vertices are known.

Dijkstra(G, s):

Input: s is the source

Output: mark every vertex with the shortest distance from s.

for every vertex v {

set v (F, weight(s,v))

}

set s(T, 0);

while ( there is a vertex with (F, _)) {

find the vertex v with the smallest distvamong (F, dist)

set v(T, distv)

for every w(F, dist) adjacent to v {

if(distv+ weight(v,w) < dist)

set w(F, distv + weight(v,w))

}

}

Linear, but can be improved by using heaps.

Can you add more information to get the shortest paths?

- If we use a vector to store “dist” information for all vertices, then finding the smallest value takes O(|V|) time, and the total updating takes O(|E|) time, and the running time is O(|V|2).
- If we use a binary heap to store “dist” information, the finding the smallest takes O(log|V|) time and every updating also takes O(log|V|) time, so the total running time is
O(|V|) + O(|V|log|V|) +O(|E|log|V|)

= O(|E|log|V|).

A greedy algorithm is used in optimization problems. It makes the local optimal choice at each stage with the hope of finding the global optimum.

- Example 1. Make 87yuan using the fewest possible bills. Using greedy algorithm, one can choose
- 50, 20, 10, 5, 2, and this is the optimal solution.

- Example 2. Make 15 krons, where available bills are 1, 7 and 10.
- Using greedy algorithm, the solution is 10, 1,1,1,1,1.
- The best solution is 7, 7, and 1.

- The greedy approach leads to:
- simple and intuitive algorithms
- efficient algorithms
- But , it does not always lead to an optimal solution.
- Since the greedy approach doesn’t assure the optimality of the solution we have to analyze for each particular problem if the algorithm leads to an optimal solution.

- We can prove that the distance recorded in distance is the length of the shortest path from source to v.
- Prove: when v is choosen and marked with (T, dist), dist is the shortest path from 0 to v .

distance[x]<distance[v]

And x must be in S

Notice that the assumption is the weight is positive.

Red vertices are marked with T, x is the first unknown vertex on the shortest path from 0 to v

- Shortest path algorithm paper
- EWD hand writing notes
- http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/

- Definition of minimum spanning trees for undirected, connected, weighted graphs.
- Prim’s algorithm, a greedy algorithm.
- Basic observation: G=(V,E), for any A V, if an edge e has the smallest weight connection A and V-A, then e is in a MST.
- A local optimal choice is also a global optimal choice.

- Method:
Build the MST by adding vertices and edges one by one staring with one vertex.

At some stage, let A be the set of the vertices that are already added, V-A be the set of the remaining vertices that are not added.

- Find the smallest weighted edge e = (u,v), that connects A and V-A, that is, e has the smallest weight among those edges with uA and v V-A.
- Now add vertex v to A and edge (u,v) to the MST.
- Repeat step 1 and 2 above until A=V.

- 1. Starting from a node, 0;
- 2. Add a vertex v and an edge (0,v) which has a weight as small as possible

3. Add a vertex u such that an edge connecting u and {0,v} has a weight as small as possible;

4. Repeat the process until all vertices are added.

- To be able to find the smallest weighted edge connecting A and V-A, on every vertex u V-A, maintain the information “what is the smallest weighted edge connecting u with A”.
- This information is easily initialized, then the smallest weighted edge connection A and V-A is easily found, finally, the information is easily maintained.

Method: Mark every vertex v with (added, dist, neib): whether v is added in T and the current smallest edge weight connecting v with a vertex neib in T.

- Starting with v(false, weight(s,v), s), s(true, 0, s), i.e. T has one vertex s.
- Find the vertex v with the smallest distv among those (false, dist, u).
- Mark v with (true, distv, u).
Updating those (false, _, _):

for every w(false, distw, k) adjacent to v,

if (weight(v,w) < distw)

set w(false, weight(v,w), v).

- Repeat 2 until every vertex is marked with (true,_, _).

- Use X to denote the set of nodes added in the tree, D[v] (vX) to denote the distance from v to X, N[v] v’s nearest neighbor in X.
- 1. Starting with X={ 0}; D[v]=weight[0][v];N[v]=0;
- 2. Repeat the action n-1 times:
- a) choose a vertex vX such that D[v] is the smallest weight;
- b) update X: X = X+{v}.
- c) update Y: Y = Y+{(v,N[v])};
- d) update D: for all wX, if (weight[v][w]<D[w]) then D[w] = weight[v][w] and N[w]=v.

- Intialization: for all v
- X[v]=flase; X[0]=true;
- D[v]=weight[0][v];
- N[v]=0;
- 2. Repeat the following action n-1 times:
- a) find the smallest D[v] such that X[v]=false;
- b) X[v]=true;
- c) for all w such that (v,w)E and X[w]=false,
- if (weight[v][w]<D[w]) {
- D[w] = weight[v][w];
- N[w]=v;
- }

- Running time: O(|V|2+|E|) = O(|V|2 ).
- One may improve the algorithm by using a heap to get the smallest connecting edge, and get O(|E|log|V| + |V|log|V|) = O(|E|log|V|), which is good for sparse graphs.

- Like preorder traversal for trees
- DFS starting at some vertex v:
- visit v and continue to visit neighbors of v in a recursive pattern
- To avoid cycles, a vertex is marked visited when it is visited.

- Running time: O(|V|+|E|).

RDFS is called once for every node.

Finding neighbours of v: for matrix it is n, for adjacency list it is degree(v).

Time complexity: O(|V|+|E|) if adjacency lists are used.

0

8

2

9

1

7

3

6

4

5

Adjacency List

Visited Table (T/F)

source

Pred

Initialize visited

table (all False)

Initialize Pred to -1

Captures the structure of the recursive calls

- when we visit a neighbor w of v, we add w as child of v
- whenever DFS returns from a vertex v, we climb up in the tree from v to its parent

- Graphs can be used to model real problems
- Two typical graph representations: matrix and adjacency lists
- Graph algorithms, the methods, applications and complexities.
- Topological sort
- BFS and DFS
- Dijkstra’s algorithm for single source shortest paths
- Prim’s algorithm for minimum spanning trees
- Greedy algorithms, a problem solving strategy.

- Exercises: see course web page for problem set 4.
- The last programming assignment is posted.