1 / 12

The Backdrop: The Global Scenario

Global Forum on Issues of International Quality Assurance Regional Perspectives: The Asia-Pacific A.Gnanam National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC), India. The Backdrop: The Global Scenario.

melva
Download Presentation

The Backdrop: The Global Scenario

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Global Forum on Issues ofInternational Quality AssuranceRegional Perspectives: The Asia-Pacific A.Gnanam National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC), India

  2. The Backdrop:The Global Scenario • Global Public Expenditure on HE - more than 1000 billion US $ • Global Private Investment in HE - around 500 billion US $ • Annual gain by the presence of overseas students in the country - 10 billion US $ in USA in 2000 - 3.2 billion A$ in Australia in 2000 ...Continued

  3. Continuation... • International Trade in HE through consumption abroad - 27 billion US $ in 1995 • Overseas students in the campus - Covered by National QA systems • Consumption abroad - Transnational in delivery, not covered by national QA, Questionable qualifications

  4. Trade in HE in Asia-Pacific • Major exporters in HE • USA, France, Germany, England, Australia, Canada • First among the exporters of HE - USA • Major importers from USA • 58% of the US trade in education is with the Asian Countries • In order - Japan, Taiwan, China, Malaysia, India, Indonesia, Korea

  5. The Asia-Pacific Context(Major Importers) • Around 35 countries of different stages of socio-economic development • Diversity in language, culture and coverage • Variance in changing context and consequent challenges • Difference in the development stage of HE • Difference in the development of QA systems

  6. Development of QA • Among the major importers - Japan, India, Indonesia, Malaysia - dedicated QA • Korea - QA by the Korean Council of Univ. • China - QA mechanism by the existing govt. regulatory body • Other Asian countries - well established in Philippines - initial stage in Cambodia, Vietnam and Sri Lanka • Network efforts - AUN, APQN of INQAAHE, UNESCO sponsored Expert Meet on Indicators of Qualityin India

  7. QA and Mutual Recognition Issues of Concern • Absence of a regional recognition center • Absence of a well developed regional data base on course equivalence • Variance in quality and qualifications framework among the countries Encouraging Development • Move towards NQA in all the countries Viable Alternate - NQA as a tool for MR

  8. International Regulatory Framework • Imbalance in the number of providers and receivers • Issues of developed Vs developing countries • Increased access through import cannot be an option • Long term import will be a drain on the system • Education as basic infrastructure has to be developed in the developing world • Low volume transnational activity in most of the countries

  9. Limitations of IRF • Tension with the national QA • Sustainability and Feasibility of IRF • IRF cannot differ much from a good NQA • IRF itself may be construed an intrusive step in the global educational services

  10. Viable Strategy • International Framework but not Regulatory in nature • Co-operation among NQAAs and not a centralised regulatory body • Collective strategy based on: • Trustworthy NQAAs • Code of Good Practices • WTO as the appellate body Good Starting Point – UNESCO Code

  11. UNESCO Code of Good Practices • Drawn from many sources • Based on extensive consultations • Interaction and reference with • NGOs • IAUP • GATS circulars • CRE • ESIB • CHEA etc

  12. Thank You

More Related