Slide1 l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 28

We assume that for the j th random sample collected over time, we have the observations ( x i , y ij ), i = 1, 2, …, n . PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 84 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

The Monitoring of Linear Profiles Keun Pyo Kim Mahmoud A. Mahmoud William H. Woodall Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA 24061-0439 (Send request for paper, submitted to JQT , to [email protected]).

Download Presentation

We assume that for the j th random sample collected over time, we have the observations ( x i , y ij ), i = 1, 2, …, n .

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Slide1 l.jpg

The Monitoring of Linear ProfilesKeun Pyo Kim Mahmoud A. MahmoudWilliam H. WoodallVirginia Tech Blacksburg, VA 24061-0439(Send request for paper, submitted to JQT, to [email protected])


Slide2 l.jpg

We assume that for the jth random sample collected over time, we have the observations (xi , yij), i = 1, 2, …, n.


Applications include l.jpg

Applications include…

  • Calibration problems in analytical chemistry (Stover and Brill, 1998)

  • Semiconductor manufacturing (Kang and Albin, 2000)

  • Automobile manufacturing (Lawless et al., 1999)

  • DOE applications (Miller, 2002 and Nair et al. 2002)


Slide4 l.jpg

It is assumed that when the process is in statistical control, the underlying model isi = 1, 2, …, n,  where the ’s are independent, identically distributed (i.i.d.) N(0, ).


Slide5 l.jpg

The least squares estimators and have have a bivariate normal distribution with the mean vector and the variance-covariance matrix


Phase ii l.jpg

Phase II

First we consider the Phase II case involving process monitoring with in-control values of the parameters assumed to be known.


Slide8 l.jpg

The first control strategy of Kang and Albin (2000) is a T2 chart based on the estimated regression coefficients


Slide9 l.jpg

Their second control strategy is to apply an EWMA - R chart combination scheme to the residuals obtained with each sample.


The residuals for the j th sample are i 1 2 n l.jpg

The residuals for the jth sample are i = 1, 2, … , n.


Instead we propose scaling the x values to obtain the model l.jpg

Instead, we propose scaling the X-values to obtain the model


Slide12 l.jpg

Since now the least squares estimators are independent, we recommend three EWMA charts in Phase II to detect sustained shifts in the parameters. There is a chart for each regression coefficient and one for the variation about the line.


Arl comparisons l.jpg

ARL Comparisons

We use the in-control model

with error terms i.i.d. N(0, 1). The values for X are 2, 4, 6, 8.


Slide19 l.jpg

Our proposed method (EWMA_3) has better ARL performance than competing methods. The interpretation is also much easier.


Slide20 l.jpg

Phase I In Phase I, one has k sets of bivariate observations. One checks for stability of the linear profiles over time and estimates parameters.


Slide21 l.jpg

We recommend Shewhart type charts for each regression parameter and change-point methods.EWMA charts are not recommended in Phase I.


Relationship to regression adjusted control charts l.jpg

Relationship to Regression-adjusted Control Charts

Monitoring linear profiles is a generalization of regression-adjusted methods studied by Mandel (1969), Zhang (1992), Wade and Woodall (1993), Hawkins (1991, 1993), and Hauck et. al (1999).


Slide23 l.jpg

Suppose X is an input quality variable and Y is the output quality variable with k = 1 and n = 1. Then we have the simplest regression-adjusted chart, sometimes referred to as the cause-selecting chart. (Note X-values are random.)


Conclusions l.jpg

Conclusions

  • Monitoring linear profiles seems to be quite useful.

  • Regression-adjusted methods deserve wider application since usual methods can be misleading if output quality is affected by input quality as is often the case.

  • Methods can be extended to more complicated models.


Slide25 l.jpg

ReferencesAlbin, S. L. (2002). Personal communication.Andrews, D. W. K., Lee, I., and Ploberger, W. (1996). “Optimal Changepoint Tests for Normal Linear Regression”. Journal of Econometrics 70, pp. 9-38.Brill, R. V. (2001). “A Case Study for Control Charting a Product Quality Measure That is a Continuous Function Over Time”. Presented at the 45th Annual Fall Technical Conference, Toronto, Ontario. Crowder, S. V., and Hamilton, M. D. (1992). “An EWMA for Monitoring a Process Standard Deviation”. Journal of Quality Technology 24, pp. 12-21.Hauck, D. J., Runger, G. C., and Montgomery, D. C. (1999). “Multivariate Statistical Process Monitoring and Diagnosis with Grouped Regression-Adjusted Variables”.Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 28, pp. 309-328.


Slide26 l.jpg

Hawkins, D. M. (1991). “Multivariate Quality Control Based on Regression-Adjusted Variables”. Technometrics 33, pp.61-75.Hawkins, D. M. (1993). “Regression Adjustment for Variables in Multivariate Quality Control”. Journal of Quality Technology 25, pp. 170-182. Jin, J., and Shi, J. (2001). “Automatic Feature Extraction of Waveform Signals for In-Process Diagnostic Performance Improvement”. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 12, pp. 257-268. Kang, L., and Albin, S. L. (2000). “On-Line Monitoring When the Process Yields a Linear Profile”. Journal of Quality Technology 32, pp. 418-426.Lawless, J. F., Mackay, R. J., and Robinson, J. A. (1999). “Analysis of Variation Transmission in Manufacturing Processes-Part I”. Journal of Quality Technology 31, pp. 131-142.Lucas, J. M., and Saccucci, M. S. (1990). “Exponentially Weighted Moving Average Control Schemes: Properties and Enhancements”. Technometrics 32, pp. 1-29.


Slide27 l.jpg

Mandel, B. J. (1969). “The Regression Control Chart”. Journal of Quality Technology 1, pp. 1-9.Mason, R. L., Chou, Y.-M., and Young, J. C. (2001). “Applying Hotelling’s T2 Statistic to Batch Processes”. Journal of Quality Technology 33, pp. 466-479.Miller, A. (2002). “Analysis of Parameter Design Experiments for Signal-Response Systems”. Journal of Quality Technology 34, pp. 139-151.Montgomery, D. C. (2001). Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. 4th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.Myers, R. H. (1990). Classical and Modern Regression with Applications. 2nd Edition, PWS-Kent Publishing Company, Boston, MA.Nair, V. N., Taam, W., and Ye, K. Q. (2002). “Analysis of Functional Responses from Robust Design Studies with Location and Dispersion Effects”. To appear in the Journal of Quality Technology.


Slide28 l.jpg

Ryan, T. P. (1997). Modern Regression Methods. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.Ryan, T. P. (2000). Statistical Methods for Quality Improvement. 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.Stover, F. S., and Brill, R. V. (1998). “Statistical Quality Control Applied to Ion Chromatography Calibrations”. Journal of Chromatography A 804, pp. 37-43. Wade, M. R., and Woodall, W. H. (1993). “A Review and Analysis of Cause-Selecting Control Charts”. Journal of Quality Technology 25, pp. 161-169. Walker, E., and Wright, S. P. (2002). “Comparing Curves Using Additive Models”. Journal of Quality Technology 34, pp. 118-129.Zhang, G. X. (1992). Cause-Selecting Control Chart and Diagnosis, Theory and Practice. Aarhus School of Business, Department of Total Quality Management, Aarhus, Denmark.


  • Login