1 / 11

QQ photoproduction in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions in CMS

Summer Student Session CERN, 16 th August 2006 Aurélien Hees. QQ photoproduction in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions in CMS. _. Very strong E. g. J/ Y , ¡. J/ Y  e + e - ¡  m + m -. g + Pb . ℓ -. g. ℓ +. Phys ics process.

meira
Download Presentation

QQ photoproduction in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions in CMS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Summer Student Session CERN, 16th August 2006 Aurélien Hees QQ photoproduction inultraperipheral PbPb collisionsin CMS _

  2. Very strong E g J/Y, ¡ J/Y e+e- ¡  m+m- g + Pb  ℓ- g ℓ+ Physics process • ultra-relativistic beam of Pb produces a very strong localized EM field (due to high Pb nucleus charge) • This strong EM produces a flux of photons • This g flux will collide another Pb nucleus and this collision produces quarkonia : J/Y (cc) and ¡ (bb)  decay into 2 leptons _ _

  3. Pb* Pb J/,¡ Pb Pb* Physics motivation • The goal : to study the structure inside the nucleus : • what are the building blocks of the nucleus ? • how much energy and momentum do they carry ? • Parton Distribution Function (pdf) : probability density for finding a parton with a certain momentum fraction x • gPb collisions allow to study PDF in a range of (x,Q2) not probed so far ZEUS X=fraction of the proton momentum carried by the parton

  4. Compact Muon Solenoid

  5. Detection in CMS J/Y e+e- : tracker and Electromagnetic Calorimeter (ECAL) ¡  m+m- : tracker and Muon chambers TRACKER ECAL HCAL Muon Chambers

  6. ¡ m- g m+ Input Monte-Carlo signal • Input signal : Monte-Carlo simulation done by : Starlight [J.Nystrand, S.Klein, NPA752(2005)470] • Centred at mid-rapidity • Peaked at very low pT • ¡ distributions : ~ CMS acceptance Single m Rapidity distribution ¡ distributions(m pairs)

  7. g g Input background • g + g collisions  ℓ+ℓ- • Generated by Starlight (again) • Mixed to ¡ (J/Y) events according to cross-sections ratios : Single m rapidity distribution More data’s OUT of CMS acceptance m pairs :

  8. Detector’s simulation (Geant4) Mixing simulated data’s (background + signal) Digitization Data’s Reconstruction CMS Simulation & Reconstruction • e+e- : tracker + ECAL • m+m- : tracker + muon chambers • reconstructed pT distribution • reconstructed rapidity distribution

  9. Results : Acceptance x Efficiency • Acceptance x Efficiency = • Acc x Eff (y) = ~ 0.8 within |y|<1 ~ 0 beyond |y|>2.5 • Acc x Eff (pT) = ~ 0.65 ~ CMS acceptance

  10. ¡ Background Results : mass distribution • Peak at the right energy ~ 9.46 GeV • With good resolution ~ 70 MeV • Signal observable since most of continuum pairs go comparatively more forward • We assume perfect trigger • Polynomial + gaussian fit Background substraction

  11. Conclusion • Simulations studies of J/Y and ¡ in CMS (@ = 5.5 TeV) • Signal observable (Signal/Background ~ 2) • Good mass resolution σJ/ψ= 60 MeV/c2 andσ¡ = 68 MeV/c2 • High rates expected (for L = 1 pb-1 ) : J/ ~ 80 Mevents,  ~ 500 kevents (assuming perfect trigger) • Acceptance x Efficiency pT ~ 0.35 (J/) and 0.65 (¡) • Studies of the parton distribution function at low x possible !

More Related