1 / 30

The azimuthal anisotropy in high energy heavy ion collisions at RHIC

The azimuthal anisotropy in high energy heavy ion collisions at RHIC. Shingo Sakai Univ. of Tsukuba. p ｙ. ｙ. p ｘ. ｘ. Azimuthal anisotropy. A powerful probe of the initial state of the high energy heavy ion collision Low p T pressure gradient of early stage of collision

meie
Download Presentation

The azimuthal anisotropy in high energy heavy ion collisions at RHIC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The azimuthal anisotropy in high energy heavy ion collisions at RHIC Shingo Sakai Univ. of Tsukuba

  2. pｙ ｙ pｘ ｘ Azimuthal anisotropy • A powerful probe of the initial state of • the high energy heavy ion collision • Low pT • pressure gradient of early stage of collision • High pT • parton energy loss in hot & • dense medium Initial spatial anisotropy Momentum space anisotropy of particle emission dN/dφ ∝ N0(1+2v2cos(2φ))

  3. Reaction plane method • Reaction plane ; defined beam direction & impact parameter direction • particle’s φ measured with respect to the reaction plane v2 is obtained (1) by fitting dN/dφ (2) <cos(2(-))> Y  wi*sin(2i) tan2 rp =  wi*cos(2i) Reaction Plane X dN/d(-) ∝ N (1 + 2v2obscos(2(-)))

  4. Today’s topics • Identified particles v2 (Au+Au 200 GeV) • pions, kaons, protons • φ • electrons • photons • Energy dependence of v2 • 62.4, 130 and 200 GeV • System size dependence • Au+Au & Cu+Cu These measurement gives us much more information of the collision dynamics and particle productions

  5. Identified particles v2

  6. Identified hadron v2 • pT<1.5 GeV/c • mass dependence v2(π)>v2(K)>v2(p) • consistent with hydro model prediction (τ0 = 0.6 fm/c) System thermalizes very early • pT>2.0 GeV/c • v2(ｂ) > v2(ｍ) • consistent with quark coalescence model (N.Q.S)

  7. v2 already developed in partonic phase ? • identified hadrons v2 after scaling number of quarks • v2 after scaling fall on same curve • partonic level v2 • v2 already formed in the partonic phase for hadrons made of light quarks (u,d,s)

  8. Φ meson v2 • φ v2 is important • mass dependence ? v2(p) ~ v2(φ) • Quark number scale ? => number of quarks = 2 saturate around 2.0 GeV/c like π,K v2 • Current φ v2 has large error =>consistent with hydro model & quark coalescence model

  9. Electron v2 • electron sources ; • photonic --- hadronic decay • (π0,η, etc.) • non-photonic --- heavy flavor • decay (c) • => give us charm flow info. • v2non-γe = {(1+RNP)v2e - v2γe} }/RNP RNP ; phonic / non-photonic v2γe; phonic e v2 converter ; experimentally determined with/without converter cocktail ; simulation Non photonic signal Photonic b.g. Experimentally determined simulation photonic e v2 inclusive e v2

  10. Non-photonic electron v2 • pT dependence non-γ e v2 • low pT ; increasing with pT • high pT ; small energy loss ? B contribution ? • Compared with quark coalescence model prediction. • with/without charm quark flow • (Greco, Ko, Rapp: PLB 595 (2004) 202) • Below 2.0 GeV/c ; • consistent with charm quark • flow model. • indicate charm quark flow 0 1 2 3

  11. Charm v2 estimate from non-γ e v2 • Estimate charm v2 with non-γ e v2 • Assuming several v2 shape for D meson v2 Dv2(pT) = api * pi v2 Dv2(pT) = aK * kaon v2 Dv2(pT) = ap * proton v2 • Calculate D -> e • chi-squared test with • “measured” non-photonic electron v2 • find chi-squared “a” • Calculate charm v2 from the D v2 with N.Q.S D meson v2 Decay electron v2

  12. Charm quark v2 (private analysis) • mass effect for N.Q.S • v2M (pT) = v21 (R1 pT) + v22 (R2pT) • Ri = mi / mM • (mi ; effective mass of quark i) • (Phys.Rev. C68 (2003) 044901 • Zi-wei & Dence Molnar) • v2π(pT) ~ 2*v2q(1/2pT) • v2D(pT) ~ v2u (1/6*pT) + v2c (5/6*pT) u quark v2 • Mass effect in partonic level ?

  13. Photon v2 [Photon production mechanism] thermalization Hadronisation Direct photon thermal photon ; v2>0 Bresmsrahlung ; v2<0 prompt photon v2=0 Hadron decay • direct photon provide very early time information • photon @ high pT • prompt photon dominant • prompt photon ; binary scale (no energy loss) • v2 @ high pT ; expect v2 = 0

  14. Direct photon v2 R*direct photon v2 • Trend ; v2 seems like smaller @ most central => bremsstrahlung main source pT < 4.0 GeV/c ? • direct photon v2 @ high pT < 10 GeV/c coming soon !

  15. Summary for identified v2 • Identified hadrons (π,K,p,Λ,φ ---) • v2 @ low pT consistent with hydro model => early timethermalization • v2 scale number of quarks (quark coalescence) => partonic level flow • non-photonic electron • consistent with charm flow model => charm quark flow • direct photon • Trend ; v2 seems like smaller @ most central • => bremsstrahlung main source pT < 4.0 GeV/c ?

  16. Energy &System size dependence

  17. v2 (Au+Au) @ 62.4 , 130 & 200 GeV Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 232302 • very similar v2 @ 62.4, 130 & 130 GeV at same Npart • same v2 @ 62.4 GeV & 200 GeV

  18. Energy dependence ; Softening EOS @ RHIC 130 62.4 200 AGS SPS RHIC Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 232302 • v2saturate @ √sNN = 62.4 ~ 200 GeV => indicate “softening” of EOS

  19. Cu+Cu results Hirano et al., nucl-th/0506058 • Hydrodynamical behavior @ Cu+Cu collisions ? • What’s the scaling laws of v2 between Au+Au & Cu+Cu ?

  20. v2 is scaled by system size (A) linearly ? • AMPT : v2 scale system size ; v2 (Cu+Cu) ~ 0.3 * v2(Au+Au) • v2 (Cu+Cu) ~ 0.8 * v2(Au+Au) • v2 doesn’t scale system size (A) linearly

  21. Eccentricity scaling • Hydro ; v2 scales with eccentricity Y Eccentricity ; relate to geometry of overlap region x (1) v2(cent,pT) divide by v2(cent) ; v2(pT,cent)/v2(cent) v2(cent) = ∫v2(pT,cent)dpT ~ ε (2) v2 divide by eccentricity (ε) ; v2/<ε>

  22. Eccentricity scailing v2 @ Au+Au & Cu+Cu Au+Au Cu+Cu • v2 Au+Au @ Cu+Cu fall on same curve after eccentricity scailing • Eccentricity works well

  23. dN/dη& RAA @ Au+Au & Cu+Cu 200 GeV PHOBOS Cu+Cu Preliminary (PHOBOS) Cu+Cu Preliminary 15-25%, Npart = 61 Au+Au Au+Au 45-55%, Npart = 56 • dN/dη & RAA @ Au+Au & Cu+Cu --- very similar at same Npart

  24. v2 scales with Npart ? PHOBOS PHOBOS • v2 @ Au+Au & Cu+Cu ; very different same at Npart • v2/<εpart> @ is very similar at same Npart < εpart >; taking into account fluctuation in <ε> Cu+Cu Au+Au Image ; same Npart Au+Au & Cu+Cu

  25. Summary for energy & system size dependence • Energy dependence same v2 @ 62.4 GeV, 130 GeV and 200 GeV => indicate “softening” of EOS • System size dependence (Au+Au v.s. Cu+Cu) • v2 doesn’t scale with system size (A) • Eccentricity scailing well works • Npart scaling between Au+Au & Cu+Cu

  26. Outlook • Detector update @ PHENIX • new reaction plane detector => good reaction plane resolution (reduce error bar) • silicon vertex detector => direct measurement of D meson • Future v2 result @ PHENIX • High pT v2 with smaller error (non-γ e & direct photon, etc・・・) • J/ψ v2 • D meson v2, etc ・・・

  27. Back Up

  28. Converter method Separate non-photonic & photonic e v2 by using Non-converter run & converter run Non-converter ; Nnc = Nγ+Nnon-γ Converter ; Nc = R *Nγ+Nnon-γ (1+RNP)v2nc = v2γ + RNPv2non-γ (R+RNP) v2c = Rv2γ + RNPv2non-γ v2non-γ(non-photonic) & v2γ(photonic) is “experimentally” determined ! RNP；non-photonic/photonic R --- ratio of electrons with & without converter (measured) RNP --- non-photonic/photonic ratio (measured) v2nc --- inclusive e v2 measured with non-converter run (measured) v2c --- inclusive e v2 measured with converter run (measured)

  29. Cocktail method Determined photonic electron v2 with simulation Then subtract it from electron v2 measured with non-converter run dNe/d = dNpho.e /d + dNnon-pho.e /d v2non-γ = {(1+RNP) v2 - v2γ} } / RNP measured RNP；non-photonic/photonic measured calculate Clear non-photonic signal ! S/B > 1 in pT>1.5 GeV/c RNP --- non-photonic/photonic ratio experimentally determined v2 --- inclusive electron v2 (without converter) v2γ --- photonic electron v2 calculated from pi0 (pion) v2 From F. Kajihara

  30. Chi2 map & D meson v2 v2 D = a * pi v2 v2 D = a * kaon v2 v2 D = a * proton v2 v2 D = a * D v2 (y_T scailing)

More Related