1 / 25

P07108: METEOR Instrumentation Recovery System

P07108: METEOR Instrumentation Recovery System. Team. Bash Nanayakkara – Project Manager (ISE) Scott Defisher – Fuselage Design (ME) Mike Kochanski – Software Design (CE) Paul Matejcik – Electronic System Design (EE) Derrick Miller – Wings Design (ME)

megara
Download Presentation

P07108: METEOR Instrumentation Recovery System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. P07108: METEOR Instrumentation Recovery System

  2. Team • Bash Nanayakkara – Project Manager (ISE) • Scott Defisher – Fuselage Design (ME) • Mike Kochanski – Software Design (CE) • Paul Matejcik – Electronic System Design (EE) • Derrick Miller – Wings Design (ME) • Phillip Gurbacki- Landing System Design (ME) • Ryan Weisman – Tail Design (ME)

  3. Guides & Sponsors • Dr. Roy Melton – Guide • Dr. Marca Lam – Technical Guide • Dr. Patru – Customer • Harris - Sponsor

  4. Outline • Project Description • Customer Needs • Concept • Design • Technical Risk Assessment • Mitigation • Budget • MSDII Schedule

  5. Project Mission • A recovery system for the instrumentation platform from approximately 100,000 feet • Ability to be controlled either remotely or autonomously • Safe controlled descent to a designated area.

  6. Customer Needs • Controlled Descent • Land in a designated Safe Zone • Land within an allowable velocity and impact • Carry the payload of 8 lbs • Production Cost of $1000 • Reasonable Weight • Safety

  7. Customer Needs Translation • Auto-Pilot system • Parachute Deployment System • Strong Fuselage Structure • Reusability reduces production cost • Lightweight Structure • Warning System

  8. Concept RELEASE: Glider is released from balloon, This happens regardless of rocket launch. DROP: Produce lift and decrease altitude. RETURN: Reduce the distance from launch site LANDING: Deploy Parachute, float toward safe zone, compensating for wind. Note: Drawing not to scale.

  9. Design of the glider Parachute Deployment System Parachute Deployment System Wings Wings Tail Tail Fuselage Fuselage

  10. Fuselage Total Production Cost: Length : 6 feet Material: Foam and Fiberglass Weight: 4 lbs Easily fit into a car Easy to transport Manufacture in Aerospace Lab

  11. Tail Total Production Cost: $348.46 Length : 6 feet Material: Foam and Fiberglass Weight: 1.4 lbs Manufacture in Aerospace Lab Deep-Stall Characteristic

  12. Tail Deep Stall Servo Tray Assembly

  13. How the Wing Designed • Airfoil Research • Airfoil Analysis With XFLR5 • Airfoil Selection Based on Analysis • Wing Geometry Design

  14. Wing Total Production Cost: $250.49 Length : 6 feet Material: Weight: 1.4 lbs Manufacture in Aerospace Lab

  15. Control System – Electronics

  16. Control System - Software

  17. Parachute Deployment System Total Production Cost: $29.53 Line Length : 10 feet Material: Ripstop Nylon Weight: .5 lbs Manufacture in Aerospace Lab

  18. Warning System • Loudness: 110dB • Power: a 9 volt alkaline battery • Weight: Very Light • High Contrast Color • Metallic Paint

  19. Technical Risk Assessment • Risk: • The effects on the glider due to the cold temperatures of high altitude • Water damage to composites if there is a wet landing • Due to the complex shape of the fuselage and the nature of composites, the only way predict how the fuselage would react to different structural loads • Servos Fail • Sensors Fail • Warning System Fails

  20. Technical Risk Assessment • Proposed Mitigation: • Use E-glass fiber which has been used at high altitudes for other successful high altitude glider flights • Poly Epoxy states that it has chemical and water resistance • Do sample layouts of the composite and perform tensile and burn testing with ANSY simulation • If heading angle deviates significantly, parachute is deployed • If navigation fail, the glider enters deep stall mode and deploys parachute • If Siren fails, glider colors will stand out from ideal Blue Sky / Cloudy Conditions

  21. Cost & Weight of the Glider

  22. Current State of the Design • Design meets all customer needs • On target to meet project budget of $5000 • Over the target for production cost of $1000 per launch • Mitigations: • Reusability • Survivability

  23. Product Development Process Phase Phase 1: Concept Development Phase 2: System Level Design Phase 3: Detailed Design Phase 4: System Integration Phase 5: Testing MSD I MSD II 0 1 2 3 4 5 Current Phase of Development

  24. MSD II Project Schedule Milestones • March 15: Finalize detailed system design • March 16: Begin Prototyping • April 19 : Functional prototype • April 27 : Completion of testing, begin verification • April 30 : Verification completion • May 01 : Finalize documentation • May 11 : Final Project Review

  25. Q & A

More Related