1 / 19

Treatment 2.0 in Latin America and the Caribbean Baseline and perspectives

XIX International AIDS Conference. Treatment 2.0 in Latin America and the Caribbean Baseline and perspectives. Dr. Massimo N Ghidinelli Senior Advisor, HIV & STI Project Pan American Health Organization. Washington, DC 22-27 July 2012. Objective.

megan
Download Presentation

Treatment 2.0 in Latin America and the Caribbean Baseline and perspectives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. XIX International AIDS Conference Treatment 2.0 in Latin America and the Caribbean Baseline and perspectives Dr. Massimo N Ghidinelli Senior Advisor, HIV & STI Project Pan American Health Organization Washington, DC 22-27 July 2012

  2. Objective To accelerate the transition to sustainable and expanded treatment programmes in line with Treatment 2.0 • Outline: • Review the pillars of Treatment 2.0 • Analyze the situation in LAC • Discuss main conclusions that stem from this analysis

  3. Patients on ART in LAC2002–2011 2011 ART coverage in Latin America 70%, 67% in the Caribbean, highest in mid-low income settings Initiations to treatment Initiations to treatment WHO. Universal Access progress reports 2010- 2012

  4. Treatment 2.0 Reach and sustain universal access and capitalize on preventive benefit of ART 5 pillars to “re-energize” the HIV response… • Optimize treatment • Provide POC and other simplified diagnostic tools • Reduce costs • Adapt delivery systems • Mobilize communities

  5. Pillar 1. Optimize drug regimens Use of fixed dose combinations Rational use Sequencing strategies Uninterrupted availability of ARVs Simplification Phase out inappropriate regimens Objective: Control HIV infection Increase duration of each regimen

  6. Proportions of adult patients receiving WHO recommended regimens , 2010 1st line 2nd line

  7. Number of regimens in adultsper line of treatment, 2010

  8. Phasing-out obsolete ARVs, 2010 7% patients on ART receiving inappropriate ARVs (2010)

  9. ARV Stock-outsMost countries reported > 1 stock out in 2011 PAHO. Antiretroviral treatment in the spotlight: a public health analysis in Latin America and the Caribbean. 2012.

  10. Pillar 2. POC and other simplifieddiagnostic and monitoring tools Regional context • Limited decentralization of HIV T&C at the primary health care level with complex algorithms and redundant confirmatory tests • PITC partially implemented mainly in ANC settings • Insufficient impact of HIV testing strategies in key populations: 50% of MSM with an HIV test in past year; in sex workers a median of 69% • Legal policy barriers for HIV testing among adolescents

  11. Untargeted intensity of HIV T&C(2011) UNAIDS/WHO. Global HIV/AIDS Response 2011-2012.

  12. % of patients initiating ART with <200 CD42000-2011

  13. Average VL tests per patient on ART2010 Viral load / patients on ART

  14. Pillar 3. Reduce Costs ARV annual spending per patient(2008-2010), USD Spending per patient on ART (USD)

  15. Dependence of external sources for ARV 2007/2008 -2011/2012 “High dependence” countries represent 20% of PLH in the Region

  16. Pillar 4. Adapt delivery systems • Difficult to characterize service delivery models • Most ART patients concentrate in tertiary level facilities or dedicated centers • Limited decentralization of service provision Percentage alive and on treatment at 12 months of ART initiation, 2011 UNAIDS/WHO. Global HIV/AIDS Response country reported data, 2012.

  17. Pillar 5. Mobilize communities • Strongly organized civil society at national, sub regional and regional levels. (REDLAC+, CIAT, ECW+, REDCA+…) • Successful in mobilizing and achieving policies for access to free ART in all countries, and accessing to patented drugs • CS engaged in T 2.0 but doubts and anxieties about feasibility in LAC, in view of fragility of health systems (i.e stock-outs of ARV and diagnostics) • Interest in supporting improved availability of information, i.e: GIVAR

  18. Conclusions • LAC ready for Treatment 2.0, through contextualized country-based approach, operating on several pillars • Strong partnerships, with active involvement of NAP, civil society, international partners, health service-delivery institutions, professional bodies,…key for transition and to synergize public health principles with individualized approaches • Ample margins for optimization (regimens, diagnostic algorithms, decentralization of services) and cost reduction. Present “status-quo” unsustainable • Building on experience of 1st wave countries, and heightened joint monitoring of implementation plans, move towards sustainable and expanded ART programmes in line with T 2.0

  19. Acknowledgments • Monica Alonso • Pedro Avedillo • Beatriz Garcia • Bertha Gomez • Omar Sued • Freddy Perez • Rafael Mazin • Sonja Caffe • …….y otrosquehancolaborado en el desarrollo de La Lupa………….

More Related