FBI N-DEx Program Update
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 41

FBI N-DEx Program Update PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 44 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

FBI N-DEx Program Update. Ed Waigand - Supervisory Special Agent FBI/CJIS/Law Enforcement N-DEx Data Standards Manager Steve Ambrosini - Director of Operations IJIS Institute Bruce Kelling – Committee Chair IJIS Institute NIBRS/N-DEx Advisory Committee. Law Enforcement

Download Presentation

FBI N-DEx Program Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Fbi n dex program update

FBI N-DEx Program Update

Ed Waigand - Supervisory Special AgentFBI/CJIS/Law Enforcement N-DExData Standards Manager

Steve Ambrosini - Director of Operations

IJIS Institute

Bruce Kelling – Committee Chair

IJIS Institute NIBRS/N-DEx Advisory Committee


Fbi n dex program update

Law Enforcement

National Data Exchange

IJIS Institute Winter Briefing

January 7-8, 2009

2


Fbi n dex program update

N-DEx Concept

Services/Capabilities from Concept of Operations

3


N dex incremental deployment

N-DEx Incremental Deployment

Increment 1 – March 19, 2008

Increment 2 – June 30, 2009

Increment 3 – June 30, 2010

  • Other Features

  • Data Sharing Policies Control

  • Role-Based Access Control

  • On-Line Training

  • * Personalized Settings

  • * NIBRS Extract

    (Expansion)

*Notification

(Enhanced)

Entity

Correlation

Visualization

  • Leveraged Systems

  • III

  • NCIC

  • * Federated Search

  • Contributors

  • Local, State, Tribal, Federal

Entity

Resolution

Catalog/

Index

*Collaboration

(Enhanced)

Search

Incident/

Case Report

*Subscription

(Enhanced)

*Automated

Processing

Analytical

Reporting

  • Data Types

  • Incident/Case/Arrest Reports

  • Booking/Incarceration Data

  • (Probation/Parole Data)

  • Increment 1 – 50,000 users

  • Increment 2 - * - 100, 000 users

  • Increment 3 - ( ) – 200,000 users


Nibrs submission n dex submission one submission

Tribal-City-County-State-Federal

LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY

Incident/Arrest Data

NIBRS Data Extracted

ViCAP Report Populated

NCMEC Report Populated

(If Agency Requests)

(If Eligible)

(If Eligible)

NIBRS Submission + N-DEx Submission(One Submission)

Potentially

INFORMATION SHARING SYSTEM


Fbi n dex program update

Enhanced Capabilities

Visualization (Increment 1)

Increment 1 allows users to view relationships between entities selected from results set

6


Fbi n dex program update

Enhanced Capabilities

Visualization Increment 2

Concept Only

  • Increment 2 will allow users to view:

    • relationships of entities selected from a result set

    • locations of entities selected from results set

    • locations of entities selected from a link visualization

7


Geospatial search

GeoSpatial Search

Allows users to perform geospatial search

  • Search for location types:

    • residence

    • employment

    • last seen

    • arrest

    • seized (property)

    • etc.

  • Specify radius

  • Show difference between query point and location

  • Specify geographic region or geographic point

    • Address

    • Lat/long

    • Zip code

    • City, County, State

  • Use Boolean combinations

  • Import geographic query point locations from a geo-visualization display

Populate Search Location From Visualization

Concept Only

8


Fbi n dex program update

New Capabilities

Notification

  • Agency Subscribes to Automated Process

  • Agency selects who gets notified

Automated Process

  • Recipient decides how/how often

    • E-mail

    • Portal

E-Mail

Notification

Subscription

Portal

  • User Subscribes to entity/record/search

  • User Selects who gets notified

9


Fbi n dex program update

Incident Report

Incident Report

Incident Report

Incident Report

Incident Report

Incident Report

Assault 8/2/2004

Assault 8/2/2004

Assault 8/2/2004

Assault 8/2/2004

Assault 8/2/2004

Assault 8/2/2004

Submitter:

Officer Roberts

Suspect:

Doug Montrose

Victims:

Homer Olsen

Randall Milton

Submitter:

Officer Roberts

Suspect:

Doug Montrose

Victims:

Homer Olsen

Randall Milton

Submitter:

Officer Roberts

Suspect:

Doug Montrose

Victims:

Homer Olsen

Randall Milton

Submitter:

Officer Roberts

Suspect:

Doug Montrose

Victims:

Homer Olsen

Randall Milton

Submitter:

Officer Roberts

Suspect:

Doug Montrose

Victims:

Homer Olsen

Randall Milton

Submitter:

Officer Roberts

Suspect:

Doug Montrose

Victims:

Homer Olsen

Randall Milton

Create Task Force

Create Name:

Grand Rapids

Suspect:

Unknown

Right Hand: Spider

Neck: Maria

Add Users:

User# 12345 User# 12354

User# 23445

User# 34599

Tatoos

Attributes

Read:

Write:

Task Force Message Boards

Next

Walker

04/25

Drug related robbery in south

Task Force Work Space

Suspect:

Unknown

Right Hand: Spider

Neck: Maria

Tatoos

Grand Rapids

Grand Rapids

Suspect:

Unknown

Incident Report

Right Hand: Spider

Neck: Maria

Tatoos

Submitter:

Officer Roberts

Suspect:

Doug Montrose

Victims:

Homer Olsen

Randall Milton

New Capabilities

Collaboration

Increment 2 will provide a collaboration function to enable N-DEx

Users to exchange information with other N-DEx Users.

  • Share information from user’s desktop

  • Capability to create folders/share files within workspace

  • Creation of collaboration groups (e.g. task force)

  • Capability to send instant messages

  • Auditing of user actions within the collaboration area


N dex data standards

N-DEx Data Standards

  • Extensible Markup Language (XML)

  • Global Justice XML Data Model (GJXDM)

  • National Information Exchange Model (NIEM)

  • Logical Entity Exchange Specification (LEXS)

  • The N-DEx Information Exchange Package Documentation (IEPD)

    • Available at: www.it.ojp.gov


Fbi n dex program update

AK

August 2, 2008

Total Records 1,640,795

Nebraska Entire State NCJIS

45,051

New York Oneida Indian Nation

1

Oregon Entire State ONIBRS

587,234

WA

ME

MT

ND

Ohio Entire State OLLEISN

NH

MN

VT

OR

ID

MA

NY

SD

WI

Sacramento (ARIES)

RI

MI

WY

CT

PA

IA

DE Entire State DELJIS

107,611

NJ

NE

OH

MD

IN

IL

DC

UT

CA

NV

CO

WV

VA

KS

MO

KY

VA LInX Hampton Roads

22,681

NC

Los Angeles (IRIS)

107,466

TN

OK

AZ

SC

NM

AR

Harrison County WV

GA

San Diego (ARJIS)

MS

AL

LA

TX

AFOSI

Increment One Ingested

FL

Increment One Pending

FBI -482,434

BOP - 290,317

Increment Two

Texas Entire State T-DEx

Increment Three or Beyond


Fbi n dex program update

AK

January 4, 2009

Total Records 51,161,839

Nebraska Entire State NCJIS

51,665

New York Oneida Indian Nation

4

Oregon Entire State ONIBRS

587,711

WA

ME

MT

ND

Ohio Entire State OLLEISN

NH

MN

VT

OR

ID

MA

NY

SD

WI

Sacramento (ARIES)

RI

MI

WY

CT

PA

IA

DE Entire State DELJIS

149,868

NJ

NE

OH

MD

IN

IL

DC

UT

CA

NV

CO

WV

VA

KS

MO

KY

VA LInX Hampton Roads

21,256

NC

Los Angeles (IRIS)

2,577,539

TN

OK

AZ

SC

NM

AR

Harrison County WV

997

GA

San Diego (ARJIS)

1,086,449

MS

AL

LA

TX

AFOSI

Increment One Ingested

FBI -647,228

BOP - 12,093,767

ATF - 69,566

DEA - 3,086,475

FL

Increment One Pending

Increment Two

Texas Entire State T-DEx

30,789,311

Increment Three or Beyond


Fbi n dex program update

N-DEx REGIONAL ASSIGNMENTS

AK

WA

MT

OR

ID

WY

UT

CA

NV

CO

WV

VA

KY

AZ

NM

NC

HI

TN

OK

SC

AR

GA

MS

AL

LA

FL

FEDERAL

Supervisory LS Brian Edgell

[email protected]

304-625-3551

LS Beth Wade

[email protected]

304-625-4482

NORTH CENTRAL

Supervisory LS Brian Edgell

[email protected]

304-625-3551

LS Melissa Farrell

[email protected]

304-625-5568

NORTHEASTERN

SSA Damon Villella

[email protected]

304-625-2912

LS Belinda Cumpston

[email protected]

304-625-4398

ME

ND

MN

VT

NH

MA

NY

CT

SD

RI

WI

MI

PA

NJ

NE

IA

OH

MD

DE

IN

IL

DC

KS

MO

SOUTHERN

SSA Edward C. Waigand

[email protected]

304-625-4232

LS Debra Louk [email protected]

304-625-4737

LS Brian Withers

[email protected]

304-625-4860

WESTERN

Supervisory LS Ann Hall

[email protected]

304-625-4952

LS Rita Jo Willis

[email protected]

304-625-4822

LS Christina Keller

[email protected]

304-625-4326

TX

TRIBAL

SSA Larry Jennings

[email protected]

304-625-3141

LS Brian Stump

[email protected]

304-625-2958


Case study a national standard for sharing law enforcement incident and arrest information

Case Study:A National Standard for Sharing Law Enforcement Incident and Arrest Information


Standards why

Standards – Why?

Improve Communications

Help Set Expectations

Enable People and Systems to Talk to Each Other

Avoid Errors and Misunderstandings

Save Time and Money!

16


Standards progress

Standards – Progress…

17


N dex industry position april 2006

N-DEx - Industry Position April 2006

The benefits derived from the use of N-DEx by the contributing agencies must be commensurate with the effort necessary to participate

There must be broad based use of N-DEx from the largest to the smallest agencies – including local, tribal, state and federal agencies

There must be resources available to assist agencies in building the infrastructure to participate in N-DEx – these resources must include technical support, training and funding

N-DEx participation must be standards based to preclude the high cost of one-off solutions

Industry must have current information on the program to be able to assist client agencies in participating in N-DEx


Role of states

Role of States

States play a key and critical role in national reporting

There are variations in state specific data elements and codes

There are variations in state specific controls for retention and release of information

There are currently several state-level versions of incident reporting

RMS providers support multiple versions of their products to meet state specific requirements


Consequence of having several state level versions

Consequence of Having Several State-Level Versions

Serves as a cost multiplier

Larger initial cost to implement N-DEx nationwide

Higher on-going maintenance costs

Creates opportunity for delays and errors in reporting and information sharing

Limits RMS options in some states


N dex iepd

N-DEx IEPD

The N-DEx IEPD has been designed with the goal of meeting the needs of local, state and tribal law enforcement agencies. It currently encompasses hundreds of data elements.

Industry firmly believes that the N-DEx IEPD, properly configured, can solve the dilemma of satisfying state needs using a single national standard.


Industry recommendation

Industry Recommendation

“It is therefore recommended that all states (representing their respective local agencies) adopt the N-DEx IEPD as the standard to be followed for in-state as well as national incident reporting.”


Benefits of a national standard

Benefits of a National Standard

Less overall cost for initial system retrofit

Less cost for on-going maintenance

Faster implementation on a national basis

Less confusion when sharing information using a common standard

Fewer errors and delays in sharing information


A voice in the process

A Voice in the Process

There must be a process in place to ensure that state, local and tribal needs are met both initially and as information sharing needs evolve.

Therefore…

“It is recommended that the FBI provide a mechanism for states (on behalf of local agencies) to review the N-DEx IEPD and submit, via the APB, requests to add data elements particular to their state.”


The suggested process

The Suggested Process

States formally submit request to the APB to add data elements to the IEPD

Once approved by the APB, the FBI would submit the data elements to the justice XML structure task force (XSTF) for inclusion in the justice domain of NIEM


The end result

The End Result

“Adoption of a single standard for all states would save law enforcement agencies in the aggregate many millions of dollars for future system acquisitions and upgrades. Perhaps more importantly, the risk to both agencies and companies would be radically reduced.”


An update on the process

An Update On The Process:

Concept developed jointly by IJIS NIBRS/N-DEx Advisory and IPSTSC committees and submitted to IJIS Board and membership

IJIS Board formally supports the process

Concept presented to APB Information Sharing Subcommittee

Presented to LEITSC

Presented to IACP CJIS Committee

Presented to and endorsed by all APB Regional Working Groups (CSOs)

Presented to APB Information Sharing Subcommittee with regional endorsement

Motion supporting concept passed by IACP CJIS Committee

APB endorses the concept (December 2008)


Nibrs n dex committee update

NIBRS & N-DEx Committee Update


Model data flow

Model Data Flow

Incident submitted to N-DEx

Flagged Incidents are copied for NIBRS before being applied to N-DEX

Incident may be updated and supplemented as necessary – updates are copied for NIBRS

NIBRS/UCR Edit and Statistical Programs run locally to insure data quality

Incidents may be updated as necessary – all updates are treated as replacements

At preset date UCR Division processes NIBRS/UCR data received via N-DEx submission


N dex getting started

N-DEx – Getting Started

Be Willing!

Be Able!

“Git Er Done”


The steps

The Steps:

Contact FBI CJIS Liaison Specialist

Contact State CSO – for coordination

Process MOU with FBI/CJIS

Agency will need LEO Accounts

Use Computer Based Training

Use N-DEx Connectivity Check List to insure that agency is ready to connect

Map data to N-DEx IEPD


The steps continued

The Steps:(continued)

Request ConTesA Account and Password

Run test submission through ConTesA and resolve all error conditions

Run initial N-DEx load with about 100 records

After successful initial load – run a large submission – like 10,000 records

After successful large submission load, submit historical data (5 years is a good goal)

Submit on regular basis – daily is preferred


Lessons learned

Lessons Learned:

Mapping effort for initial agencies ranged from 80 to as much as several hundred hours

Generally the mapping process will take a week or two

The entire process going through planning, set-up, tests and initial data loads will probably take 4-6 months

The process becomes easier and more streamlined as experienced is gained


N dex cost model project

N-DEx Cost Model Project


N dex cost model project1

N-DEx Cost Model Project

  • Develop a budgetary cost projection for national deployment

  • Develop a budgetary cost projections for local, regional, and state LEA’s

  • Establish a cost model and estimation capability

  • Support development of future funding requirements


Project approach

Project Approach

  • Guided by the “contract” between CJIS and the four professional law enforcement associations.

  • FBI CJIS partnered with IIR and the IJIS Institute to develop the cost model

  • In conjunction with the N-DEx program office, IIR established the Cost Model Task Force – the voice of LE


Project status complete

Project Status = Complete

  • N-DEx Management ReviewAugust 27, 2008

  • Review Initial FindingsSeptember 10, 2008

  • CM Task Force Update September 24, 2008

  • APB Subcommittee UpdateOctober 21, 2008

  • IACP CJIS Update November 8, 2008

  • Model Software to FBIDecember 30, 2008


Analysis and findings

Analysis and Findings

  • Baseline Estimated Deployment Cost

    • Formula – Cost Factors - Surveys

    • Statistical Baseline

    • Composite Scenarios

  • Per Agency Scenarios

    • LEA direct life cycle

    • LEA’s reduced life cycle cost via regional / state reporting

    • Extended regional / state agency life cycle cost

    • Other - Remote N-DEx user


Study methodology

Study Methodology

  • The Formula

  • Fundamental Estimation Building Block = The LEA

  • The Cost Factors (LOE / Rates)

  • The Surveys

  • The Process

  • The Model


The model

The Model

  • Provides standard basis for modeling multiple cost scenarios.

  • Allows for the input of multiple variables

  • Supports the formulation / customization of LEA estimated costs at all levels

  • Supports the extension of averages to national deployment cost scenarios

  • Provides a baseline for assessing “What If” scenarios

  • Flexible via configuration management


Q a from excited audience

Q&A From Excited Audience!


  • Login