Brennan aircraft division bad case study
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 15

Brennan Aircraft Division (BAD) Case Study PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 46 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Brennan Aircraft Division (BAD) Case Study. By Elena White, Luigi DeAngelis & John Ramos. Overview of Presentation. Executive Summary Data Analysis Basis of Simulation Conclusion. Executive Summary. BAD operates large number of plotting machines

Download Presentation

Brennan Aircraft Division (BAD) Case Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Brennan aircraft division bad case study

Brennan Aircraft Division (BAD)Case Study

By

Elena White, Luigi DeAngelis &

John Ramos


Overview of presentation

Overview of Presentation

  • Executive Summary

  • Data Analysis

  • Basis of Simulation

  • Conclusion


Executive summary

Executive Summary

  • BAD operates large number of plotting machines

    • Consist of minicomputer system that directs 4 pens to move until desired figure is drawn

    • Connected to a 4 – by-5 foot table with series of ink pens suspended above it

    • Very reliable with exception of ink pens clogging, jamming, rendering plotter unusable


Executive summary cont

Executive Summary Cont…

  • BAD replaces ink pen upon failure of each

  • Alternative repair by service manager

    • Replace all 4 ink pens upon one failure

    • Ideally reducing the frequency of failures


Data analysis

Data Analysis

  • The following data was provided by the case study:

    • Total cost of downtime $50/hr

    • Replacement time of 1 pen = 1 hr/pen

    • Replacement time of 4 pens 2 hr/set

    • Cost of each pen $8/pen


Data analysis cont

Data Analysis Cont…

  • Probability Distribution Between Failures

    (each pen replaced as it fails)


Data analysis cont1

Data Analysis Cont…

  • Probability Distribution Between Failures

    (4 pens replaced as 1 fails)


Data analysis cont2

Data Analysis Cont…

  • Additional data (assumptions used in simulation to establish year utilization)


Basis of simulation

Basis of Simulation

  • Simulated Brennan’s problem for two options

    • Case 1 : Replace ink pen as it fails

    • Case 2 : Replace all four ink pens as one fail

  • Used “Next Event Increment Model” approach to carry out the simulation

  • Split runs in “Year (of 2500 hrs each)” this helps in results analysis

    • Each run is arrested when “close enough” to 2500 hrs. A “While-cycle” would have been best approach. A spreadsheet works well as analysis is simple

  • Used VLOOKUP to instantaneously look-up probability tables and determine hours between plotter failures


Basis of simulation cont

Basis of Simulation Cont…

  • Computed total time adding downtime to TBF computed from Probability Distribution.

  • Derived total cost of each failure

    • Cost of 1 pen plus cost of One hour of downtime (case 1) = 58 $

    • Cost of 4 pens plus cost of Two hour of downtime (case 1) = 132 $

    • Computed failures for the equivalent of 1 plotter year. Run repeated 5 times (reasonable life-cycle for a plotter).


Simulation results

Simulation: Results

Case 2 is the most convenient choice evaluated as an average on a 5-Year simulation.


Analytical results

Analytical Results

  • A different approach has been followed based on analytical considerations.

  • The Mean for each distribution has been calculated, i.e. MTBF.

  • We calculated number of failures X year as:

    • Numb. Fail. X Year= 2500 / (MTBF + MT)

  • We calculated costs in 1 Year as:

    • 1 Y Cost = [Numb. of Fail. X Year] * [Repairing Costs]

    • NOTE: Tot. Cost = [1 Y Cost] * [N Year]


  • Analytical solution results

    Analytical Solution: Results

    Best Choiche is again Case 2.

    Note how close Analytical and Simulated results are evaluated as an average on a 5 Y time frame.


    Conclusion

    Conclusion

    • Based on the results achieved with the .xls simulation we observed the progression of costs and maintenance times

    • Determined that in Case 2, replacement of all 4 pens upon one failed pen, will minimize maintenance costs for BAD

    • Analytical results reinforce our simulated study that Case 2 is indeed the best policy to implement. (or viceversa?)


    Any questions

    Any Questions?


  • Login