Responding to intimate partner violence in the child welfare system
Download
1 / 9

Responding to Intimate Partner Violence in the Child Welfare System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 78 Views
  • Uploaded on

Responding to Intimate Partner Violence in the Child Welfare System. Exposure to IPV. Central Questions: Should exposure to violence or abuse between parents be a concern? If so, in what situations or level of risk should intervention occur? What responses are appropriate? .

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Responding to Intimate Partner Violence in the Child Welfare System' - meda


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Exposure to ipv
Exposure to IPV

  • Central Questions:

    • Should exposure to violence or abuse between parents be a concern?

    • If so, in what situations or level of risk should intervention occur?

    • What responses are appropriate?


Mandate of the child welfare system
Mandate of the Child Welfare System

  • Best Interests of the Child

    • Historically and currently, children’s welfare is the primary consideration

    • Investigation to ensure child safety and well-being

    • Intervention occurs when children are at risk

Davis & Krane, 2006; Shephard & Raschick, 1999


Exposure to ipv1
Exposure to IPV

  • Should exposure to violence or abuse between parents be a concern?

    • Research on IPV exposure documents significant harm to children’s cognitive and social long-term adjustment and inconsistent and abusive parenting

    • Methodological limitations, inconsistent definitions, clinical samples, multiple sources of information, conflating direct and indirect harm, and harm due to community violence and poverty

    • Some children exposed exhibit behavioral, cognitive and emotional functioning and attitudes

Edleson, 1999; 2004; Fowler & Chanmugam, 2007; Hazen, Connelly, Kelleher, Landsverk, & Barth, 2004; Kohl & Macy, 2008


Ipv identification assessment
IPV Identification & Assessment

  • If so, in what situations or level of risk should intervention occur?

    • Theoretical development of the concept of IPV or IPA is increasingly complex

    • Multiple forms or patterns of relationships that suggest multiple responses

    • Little research of these in practice settings (in the context of complex and diverse families) and connections between IPV relationship type and harm to children

Antle, Barbee, Sullivan, Yankeelov, Johnson, & Cunningham, 2007; Johnson, 2006; Kelly and Johnson, 2008


Investigation of ipv child abuse
Investigation of IPV & Child Abuse

  • Is exposure to IPV identified as a concern?

    • CIS 2003 -- 28% of substantiated cases of child maltreatment involve exposure to DV as a primary form of maltreatment

    • Referral for services and out of home placement often involve many other co-occurring problems

    • Is the child welfare system appropriate?

Antle, Barbee, Sullivan, Yankeelov, Johnson, & Cunningham, 2007; Black, Trocme, Fallon, & MacLaurin, 2008


Established practices
Established Practices

  • What responses is appropriate?

    • Research is critical of established approaches: Examination of case files and interviews with social workers and interviews with mothers

    • Suggest two broad approaches – 1) minimization or 2) intrusive confrontation

    • Helpful responses – seeking of protection orders and aid in obtaining resources, i.e. childcare and housing

Humphreys, 1999; Johnson & Sullivan, 2008; Magen, 1999; Scourfield, 2001; Seith, 2001; Shepherds & Raschick, 1999;


Suggested alternatives
Suggested Alternatives

  • Increased focus on exposure to IPV as a form of child maltreatment:

    • Formalized screening for IPV and worker training

    • Inclusion of DV advocates within CW teams

    • Strengthening of and referrals to community DV services

Banks, Hazen, Coben, Wang, & Griffith, 2009; Edleson, 1999; Featherstone & Peckover, 2007; Magen, 1999; Smith, Kelleher, Barth, Coben, Hazen, Connelly, & Rolls, 2005)


Conclusion
Conclusion

  • Is the child welfare system appropriate for families in which IPV is occurring?

    • Understanding of the role of child protection services:

    • Investigation of risky parenting and child functioning with services offered only when risk is evaluated as high or multiple concerns are evident

    • Or enlargement of the best interests of children mandate to include best interests of the caregivers


ad